利用专家共识为教职员开发模拟课程。

John Kinnear, Barry Smith, Majid Akram, Nick Wilson, Emily Simpson
{"title":"利用专家共识为教职员开发模拟课程。","authors":"John Kinnear,&nbsp;Barry Smith,&nbsp;Majid Akram,&nbsp;Nick Wilson,&nbsp;Emily Simpson","doi":"10.1111/tct.12233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective learning from simulation-based training depends on expert facilitation by skilled faculty members, but there are few guidelines upon which to base simulation development. A collaborative approach was taken in the East of England to determine the agreed content of such a course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus amongst the simulation-provider leads in the East of England on what should be the essential elements of a training course for faculty members. A questionnaire designed by a steering group was circulated to the consensus group, and their responses were used to modify subsequent questionnaires. There was enough agreement after two rounds not to require a third round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After two rounds there was high level of agreement that the educational content should include scenario design, creating a supportive learning environment, structured debriefing formats, human factors, educational feedback and communication. There was also agreement on preferred teaching methods, minimum qualification and continuing development for faculty members. There was moderate agreement on the prior experience required of faculty members, and no agreement on the costs of courses. Effective learning from simulation-based training depends upon expert facilitation by skilled faculty members</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By using a consensus method to determine the content and format of a simulation development course designed for faculty members, there is agreement in the East of England on what constitutes an educationally sound programme. This should provide assurance to both simulation providers and commissioners of education that despite the absence of guidelines, there is an agreed practice standard for simulation-based training in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"12 1","pages":"27-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12233","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using expert consensus to develop a simulation course for faculty members.\",\"authors\":\"John Kinnear,&nbsp;Barry Smith,&nbsp;Majid Akram,&nbsp;Nick Wilson,&nbsp;Emily Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.12233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective learning from simulation-based training depends on expert facilitation by skilled faculty members, but there are few guidelines upon which to base simulation development. A collaborative approach was taken in the East of England to determine the agreed content of such a course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus amongst the simulation-provider leads in the East of England on what should be the essential elements of a training course for faculty members. A questionnaire designed by a steering group was circulated to the consensus group, and their responses were used to modify subsequent questionnaires. There was enough agreement after two rounds not to require a third round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After two rounds there was high level of agreement that the educational content should include scenario design, creating a supportive learning environment, structured debriefing formats, human factors, educational feedback and communication. There was also agreement on preferred teaching methods, minimum qualification and continuing development for faculty members. There was moderate agreement on the prior experience required of faculty members, and no agreement on the costs of courses. Effective learning from simulation-based training depends upon expert facilitation by skilled faculty members</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By using a consensus method to determine the content and format of a simulation development course designed for faculty members, there is agreement in the East of England on what constitutes an educationally sound programme. This should provide assurance to both simulation providers and commissioners of education that despite the absence of guidelines, there is an agreed practice standard for simulation-based training in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"27-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12233\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:从基于模拟的培训中有效地学习取决于熟练的教师的专家指导,但是很少有指导方针可以基于模拟开发。英格兰东部采取了一种合作方式来确定这种课程的商定内容。方法:采用一种改进的德尔菲法来确定英格兰东部模拟提供商领导对教师培训课程的基本要素的共识。一个指导小组设计了一份调查问卷,分发给意见一致的小组,他们的回答被用来修改随后的调查问卷。在两轮谈判后,各方达成了足够的共识,无需进行第三轮谈判。结果:经过两轮调查,调查对象对教育内容应包括情景设计、营造支持性学习环境、结构化汇报形式、人为因素、教育反馈和交流等方面达成了高度一致。双方还就首选的教学方法、最低资格要求和教员的持续发展达成了一致。对于教师的工作经验要求有一定的共识,但是对于课程的费用没有达成一致。从基于模拟的培训中有效地学习取决于熟练的教师的专家指导。讨论:通过使用共识方法来确定为教师设计的模拟开发课程的内容和格式,在英格兰东部地区,人们就什么是教育上合理的课程达成了共识。这应该向模拟提供者和教育专员保证,尽管缺乏指导方针,但该地区有一个商定的基于模拟的培训实践标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using expert consensus to develop a simulation course for faculty members.

Background: Effective learning from simulation-based training depends on expert facilitation by skilled faculty members, but there are few guidelines upon which to base simulation development. A collaborative approach was taken in the East of England to determine the agreed content of such a course.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus amongst the simulation-provider leads in the East of England on what should be the essential elements of a training course for faculty members. A questionnaire designed by a steering group was circulated to the consensus group, and their responses were used to modify subsequent questionnaires. There was enough agreement after two rounds not to require a third round.

Results: After two rounds there was high level of agreement that the educational content should include scenario design, creating a supportive learning environment, structured debriefing formats, human factors, educational feedback and communication. There was also agreement on preferred teaching methods, minimum qualification and continuing development for faculty members. There was moderate agreement on the prior experience required of faculty members, and no agreement on the costs of courses. Effective learning from simulation-based training depends upon expert facilitation by skilled faculty members

Discussion: By using a consensus method to determine the content and format of a simulation development course designed for faculty members, there is agreement in the East of England on what constitutes an educationally sound programme. This should provide assurance to both simulation providers and commissioners of education that despite the absence of guidelines, there is an agreed practice standard for simulation-based training in the region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterising ableism to promote inclusivity within clinical teaching. When technology fails during simulation: Time for reflection? 'Comfort Club': Student-run volunteering on the neonatal intensive care unit. The hidden pandemic: Student perspectives on domestic violence education. Learning and satisfaction in a student-led clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1