Luca Lamazza, Domenica Laurito, Marco Lollobrigida, Orlando Brugnoletti, Girolamo Garreffa, Alberto De Biase
{"title":"压电技术制备种植体过程中影响温度升高的可能因素。","authors":"Luca Lamazza, Domenica Laurito, Marco Lollobrigida, Orlando Brugnoletti, Girolamo Garreffa, Alberto De Biase","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overheating during implant site preparation negatively affects the osseointegration process as well the final outcome of implant rehabilitations. Piezoelectric techniques seem to provide to a gentle implant preparation although few scientific reports have investigated the heat generation and its underlying factors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate, through a proper methodological approach, the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Different piezoelectric tips (IM1s, IM2, P2-3, IM3, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy) have been tested. The experimental set-up consisted in a mechanical positioning device equipped with a load cell and a fluoroptic thermometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first tip of the sequence (IM1s) generated the highest temperature increasing (ΔT). The diamond tips (IM1s and P2-3) determined higher ΔT values than the smooth tips (IM2 and IM3). Further tests with IM1s suggested that the temperature elevation during the first thirty seconds may be predictive of the maximal temperature as well as of the overall thermal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working load, working movements management and bone features resulted to be the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation. Irrigant temperature and clogging effect may also synergically contribute to the heat generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"5 4","pages":"115-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333604/pdf/115-122.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of possible factors influencing temperatures elevation during implant site preparation with piezoelectric technique.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Lamazza, Domenica Laurito, Marco Lollobrigida, Orlando Brugnoletti, Girolamo Garreffa, Alberto De Biase\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overheating during implant site preparation negatively affects the osseointegration process as well the final outcome of implant rehabilitations. Piezoelectric techniques seem to provide to a gentle implant preparation although few scientific reports have investigated the heat generation and its underlying factors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate, through a proper methodological approach, the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Different piezoelectric tips (IM1s, IM2, P2-3, IM3, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy) have been tested. The experimental set-up consisted in a mechanical positioning device equipped with a load cell and a fluoroptic thermometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first tip of the sequence (IM1s) generated the highest temperature increasing (ΔT). The diamond tips (IM1s and P2-3) determined higher ΔT values than the smooth tips (IM2 and IM3). Further tests with IM1s suggested that the temperature elevation during the first thirty seconds may be predictive of the maximal temperature as well as of the overall thermal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working load, working movements management and bone features resulted to be the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation. Irrigant temperature and clogging effect may also synergically contribute to the heat generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"115-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333604/pdf/115-122.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali di stomatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:种植体准备过程中的过热会对骨整合过程以及种植体康复的最终结果产生负面影响。压电技术似乎提供了一种温和的种植体制备,尽管很少有科学报道研究了热量的产生及其潜在因素。目的:通过合理的方法,探讨影响压电种植体部位制备过程中温升的主要因素。材料和方法:已经测试了不同的压电尖端(IM1s, IM2, P2-3, IM3, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy)。实验装置包括一个配有称重传感器和荧光光学温度计的机械定位装置。结果:序列的第一尖端(IM1s)产生了最高的升温(ΔT)。金刚石尖端(im1和P2-3)比光滑尖端(IM2和IM3)确定更高的ΔT值。对im1的进一步测试表明,前30秒的温度升高可以预测最高温度以及总体热影响。结论:工作负荷、工作动作管理和骨骼特征是影响压电种植体部位制备过程中温升的主要因素。灌溉温度和堵塞效应也可能协同促进热的产生。
Identification of possible factors influencing temperatures elevation during implant site preparation with piezoelectric technique.
Background: Overheating during implant site preparation negatively affects the osseointegration process as well the final outcome of implant rehabilitations. Piezoelectric techniques seem to provide to a gentle implant preparation although few scientific reports have investigated the heat generation and its underlying factors.
Purpose: To investigate, through a proper methodological approach, the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation.
Materials and methods: Different piezoelectric tips (IM1s, IM2, P2-3, IM3, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy) have been tested. The experimental set-up consisted in a mechanical positioning device equipped with a load cell and a fluoroptic thermometer.
Results: The first tip of the sequence (IM1s) generated the highest temperature increasing (ΔT). The diamond tips (IM1s and P2-3) determined higher ΔT values than the smooth tips (IM2 and IM3). Further tests with IM1s suggested that the temperature elevation during the first thirty seconds may be predictive of the maximal temperature as well as of the overall thermal impact.
Conclusions: Working load, working movements management and bone features resulted to be the main factors influencing temperature rise during piezoelectric implant site preparation. Irrigant temperature and clogging effect may also synergically contribute to the heat generation.