后路动力经椎弓根稳定系统和假椎间盘核装置联合应用治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病伴椎间盘突出。

SAS journal Pub Date : 2008-09-01 eCollection Date: 2008-01-01 DOI:10.1016/SASJ-2008-0008-NT
Mehdi Sasani, Ahmet Levent Aydin, Tunc Oktenoglu, Murat Cosar, Yaprak Ataker, Tuncay Kaner, Ali Fahir Ozer
{"title":"后路动力经椎弓根稳定系统和假椎间盘核装置联合应用治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病伴椎间盘突出。","authors":"Mehdi Sasani,&nbsp;Ahmet Levent Aydin,&nbsp;Tunc Oktenoglu,&nbsp;Murat Cosar,&nbsp;Yaprak Ataker,&nbsp;Tuncay Kaner,&nbsp;Ali Fahir Ozer","doi":"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0008-NT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic replacement of spinal discs is emerging as a treatment option for degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization (PDTS) and prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN) devices have been used sporadically in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of 13 patients averaging 40.9 years of age with degenerative disc disease who underwent posterior placement of a PDN with a PDTS. The Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used to assess patient outcomes at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months. Lumbar range of motion was evaluated using a bubble inclinometer preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Radiological parameters including lumbar lordosis angle (LL), segmental lordosis angle (α), disc height at the operated level (DHo), and disc height of the adjacent level (DHu) were evaluated. A typical midline posterior approach for complete discectomy was followed by the simultaneous placement of the PDN with PDTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the Oswestry and VAS scores showed significant improvement postoperatively (P < .05). There were no significant differences in LL, α, DHo, and DHu parameters. We observed complications in 3 patients including 2 patients who had the PDN device embedded into the adjacent corpus; 1 had massive endplate degeneration, and the other experienced interbody space infection. In 1 patient, the PDN device migrated to one side in the vertebral space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a PDN in combination with posterior dynamic instrumentation can help to restore the physiologic motion of the anterior and posterior column and could help to establish posterior dynamic instrumentation as an important treatment of degenerative disc disease. Theoretically this concept is superior, but practically we need more advanced technology to replace disc material. Because this study examined the combination of the PDN and stabilization instrumention, the results cannot be compared with those reported in the literature for either PDN alone or dynamic screws alone.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective cohort study with good follow-up (level 1b).</p>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"2 3","pages":"130-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/51/SAS-2-2008-0008-NT.PMC4365650.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combined use of a posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization system and a prosthetic disc nucleus device in treating lumbar degenerative disc disease with disc herniations.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Sasani,&nbsp;Ahmet Levent Aydin,&nbsp;Tunc Oktenoglu,&nbsp;Murat Cosar,&nbsp;Yaprak Ataker,&nbsp;Tuncay Kaner,&nbsp;Ali Fahir Ozer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0008-NT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic replacement of spinal discs is emerging as a treatment option for degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization (PDTS) and prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN) devices have been used sporadically in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of 13 patients averaging 40.9 years of age with degenerative disc disease who underwent posterior placement of a PDN with a PDTS. The Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used to assess patient outcomes at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months. Lumbar range of motion was evaluated using a bubble inclinometer preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Radiological parameters including lumbar lordosis angle (LL), segmental lordosis angle (α), disc height at the operated level (DHo), and disc height of the adjacent level (DHu) were evaluated. A typical midline posterior approach for complete discectomy was followed by the simultaneous placement of the PDN with PDTS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the Oswestry and VAS scores showed significant improvement postoperatively (P < .05). There were no significant differences in LL, α, DHo, and DHu parameters. We observed complications in 3 patients including 2 patients who had the PDN device embedded into the adjacent corpus; 1 had massive endplate degeneration, and the other experienced interbody space infection. In 1 patient, the PDN device migrated to one side in the vertebral space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a PDN in combination with posterior dynamic instrumentation can help to restore the physiologic motion of the anterior and posterior column and could help to establish posterior dynamic instrumentation as an important treatment of degenerative disc disease. Theoretically this concept is superior, but practically we need more advanced technology to replace disc material. Because this study examined the combination of the PDN and stabilization instrumention, the results cannot be compared with those reported in the literature for either PDN alone or dynamic screws alone.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective cohort study with good follow-up (level 1b).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"130-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/51/SAS-2-2008-0008-NT.PMC4365650.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0008-NT\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0008-NT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:椎间盘假体置换术正成为椎间盘退行性疾病的一种治疗选择。后路动态经椎弓根稳定(PDTS)和假椎间盘核(PDN)装置在脊柱手术中偶有应用。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,13例平均年龄40.9岁的退行性椎间盘疾病患者接受了PDN和PDTS的后路放置。采用Oswestry腰痛残疾问卷和视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评估患者术后第3、6、12个月的预后。术前和术后12个月使用气泡倾斜仪评估腰椎活动范围。影像学参数包括腰椎前凸角(LL)、节段性前凸角(α)、操作节段椎间盘高度(DHo)和相邻节段椎间盘高度(DHu)。典型的中线后路全椎间盘切除术后,PDN与PDTS同时放置。结果:术后Oswestry评分和VAS评分均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。LL、α、DHo、DHu参数差异无统计学意义。我们观察到3例患者出现并发症,其中2例患者将PDN装置嵌入相邻的体;1例有大量终板退变,另1例有椎间间隙感染。在1例患者中,PDN装置在椎间隙内向一侧移位。结论:PDN联合后路动态内固定有助于恢复前后柱的生理运动,并有助于确立后路动态内固定作为退行性椎间盘疾病的重要治疗方法。理论上这个概念是优越的,但实际上我们需要更先进的技术来代替光盘材料。由于本研究检查了PDN和稳定器械的组合,因此结果无法与文献中单独使用PDN或单独使用动态螺钉的报道进行比较。证据水平:随访良好的前瞻性队列研究(1b级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The combined use of a posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization system and a prosthetic disc nucleus device in treating lumbar degenerative disc disease with disc herniations.

Background: Prosthetic replacement of spinal discs is emerging as a treatment option for degenerative disc disease. Posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization (PDTS) and prosthetic disc nucleus (PDN) devices have been used sporadically in spinal surgery.

Methods: This was a prospective study of 13 patients averaging 40.9 years of age with degenerative disc disease who underwent posterior placement of a PDN with a PDTS. The Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used to assess patient outcomes at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months. Lumbar range of motion was evaluated using a bubble inclinometer preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Radiological parameters including lumbar lordosis angle (LL), segmental lordosis angle (α), disc height at the operated level (DHo), and disc height of the adjacent level (DHu) were evaluated. A typical midline posterior approach for complete discectomy was followed by the simultaneous placement of the PDN with PDTS.

Results: Both the Oswestry and VAS scores showed significant improvement postoperatively (P < .05). There were no significant differences in LL, α, DHo, and DHu parameters. We observed complications in 3 patients including 2 patients who had the PDN device embedded into the adjacent corpus; 1 had massive endplate degeneration, and the other experienced interbody space infection. In 1 patient, the PDN device migrated to one side in the vertebral space.

Conclusion: The use of a PDN in combination with posterior dynamic instrumentation can help to restore the physiologic motion of the anterior and posterior column and could help to establish posterior dynamic instrumentation as an important treatment of degenerative disc disease. Theoretically this concept is superior, but practically we need more advanced technology to replace disc material. Because this study examined the combination of the PDN and stabilization instrumention, the results cannot be compared with those reported in the literature for either PDN alone or dynamic screws alone.

Level of evidence: Prospective cohort study with good follow-up (level 1b).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1