Joshua D Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H Milby, Andrew P White, Sudheer C Reddy, Baron S Lonner, Richard A Balderston
{"title":"评估腰椎间盘全置换术活动范围的视差效应。","authors":"Joshua D Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H Milby, Andrew P White, Sudheer C Reddy, Baron S Lonner, Richard A Balderston","doi":"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on \"by hand\" and on \"gold standard\" flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"2 4","pages":"184-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/3c/SAS-2-2008-0020-RR.PMC4365660.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The parallax effect in the evaluation of range of motion in lumbar total disc replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D Auerbach, Surena Namdari, Andrew H Milby, Andrew P White, Sudheer C Reddy, Baron S Lonner, Richard A Balderston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on \\\"by hand\\\" and on \\\"gold standard\\\" flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"184-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/3c/SAS-2-2008-0020-RR.PMC4365660.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:运动范围(ROM)已被证明会影响全椎间盘置换术(TDR)的临床效果。虽然文献显示图像采集中的视差效应会影响各种测量的准确性,但在评估 TDR 术后的 ROM 分析时,尚未对这一概念进行研究。我们对腰椎间盘全置换术中放射线束角度对 "徒手 "和 "金标准 "屈伸ROM测量的影响进行了评估。本研究的目的是确定:(1) X 射线束角度对使用龙骨法进行腰椎间盘置换术的指数水平角 (ILA) 测量的影响;(2) 平面外射线束效应是否会导致真实运动范围与计算运动范围之间的差异:方法:八位双盲矫形外科医生使用龙骨法,通过植入 ProDisc-L 装置(Synthes Spine,West Chester,Pennsylvania)的柔性锯骨模型(Pacific Research Laboratories,Inc.)从装置中心出发,在矢状面上分别以 0°、5°、10° 和 15° 的角度拍摄射线照片。计算结果与经过验证的数字化软件方法(定量运动分析,QMA,Medical Metrics, Inc.)结果:结果:与 QMA 相比,放射学龙骨法的平均误差为 3.7°。光束角度的变化对 ROM 测量的观察者间精度(N = 16,P = .92)或准确度(N = 16,P = 0.86)或观察者内精度(N = 8,P = .09)或准确度(N = 8,P = 0.07)均无明显影响。使用 QMA 重复测试也未发现视差的影响,ROM 测量结果几乎相同:结论:龙骨法根据 TDR 后的指数水平角测量值确定 ROM 的准确性和精确性不受 X 射线光束角度增加的影响,最多达设备中心 15°:我们的研究表明,在腰椎间盘全置换术中使用龙骨法确定指数水平角度测量值时,运动范围测量值不会受到视差效应的影响。
The parallax effect in the evaluation of range of motion in lumbar total disc replacement.
Background: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on "by hand" and on "gold standard" flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion.
Methods: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined.
Results: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements.
Conclusions: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center.
Clinical relevance: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.