Sunder Negi, Indu Sen, Virender Arya, Ashish Sharma
{"title":"右美托咪定与芬太尼在肾移植受者平衡麻醉技术中的辅助作用。","authors":"Sunder Negi, Indu Sen, Virender Arya, Ashish Sharma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ideal anesthetic technique for renal allograft recipients should provide hemodynamic stability, optimum graft reperfusion and adequate analgesia. Balanced anesthesia is preferred because renal nociception is conducted multi-segmentally and chronically ill ESRD patients have labile psychological profile. Present study compared the efficacy ofdexmedetomidine with fentanyl administered via intravenous and epidural route before induction of general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, double blind randomized study, recruited sixty hemo-dynamically stable ESRD adults, 18-55 years, scheduled for elective live related renal transplantation. Patients randomly received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg followed by epidural dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg/kg followed by epiduralfentanyl 1 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia and continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.25%; 4-8 ml/hr. Preoperative sedation, peri-operative haemodynamics, end tidal anaesthetic agent requirement, peri-operative fluid requirement, need for vasopressors, blood loss and early graft function was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80% patients receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine did not require rescue midazolam for achieving satisfactory sedation before induction of general anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced propofol and end tidal inhalational agents requirement and need for rescue analgesics. Early renal graft function (onset time of diuresis after declamping, 24 hours urine output and serum creatinine levels) was comparable. There were no adverse sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine-based anaesthetic regimen versus fentanyl-based anaesthesia provided appropriate anxiolysis and analgesia for conducting invasive procedures and subsequent epidural administration of these agents reduced anaesthetic requirement and prolonged postoperative analgesia without compromising hemodynamics and respiratory parameters. Further dose finding studies can be conducted in kidney transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"22 6","pages":"549-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as coadjuvants of balanced anaesthesia technique in renal transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Sunder Negi, Indu Sen, Virender Arya, Ashish Sharma\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ideal anesthetic technique for renal allograft recipients should provide hemodynamic stability, optimum graft reperfusion and adequate analgesia. Balanced anesthesia is preferred because renal nociception is conducted multi-segmentally and chronically ill ESRD patients have labile psychological profile. Present study compared the efficacy ofdexmedetomidine with fentanyl administered via intravenous and epidural route before induction of general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, double blind randomized study, recruited sixty hemo-dynamically stable ESRD adults, 18-55 years, scheduled for elective live related renal transplantation. Patients randomly received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg followed by epidural dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg/kg followed by epiduralfentanyl 1 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia and continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.25%; 4-8 ml/hr. Preoperative sedation, peri-operative haemodynamics, end tidal anaesthetic agent requirement, peri-operative fluid requirement, need for vasopressors, blood loss and early graft function was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80% patients receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine did not require rescue midazolam for achieving satisfactory sedation before induction of general anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced propofol and end tidal inhalational agents requirement and need for rescue analgesics. Early renal graft function (onset time of diuresis after declamping, 24 hours urine output and serum creatinine levels) was comparable. There were no adverse sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine-based anaesthetic regimen versus fentanyl-based anaesthesia provided appropriate anxiolysis and analgesia for conducting invasive procedures and subsequent epidural administration of these agents reduced anaesthetic requirement and prolonged postoperative analgesia without compromising hemodynamics and respiratory parameters. Further dose finding studies can be conducted in kidney transplant recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"549-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as coadjuvants of balanced anaesthesia technique in renal transplant recipients.
Background: Ideal anesthetic technique for renal allograft recipients should provide hemodynamic stability, optimum graft reperfusion and adequate analgesia. Balanced anesthesia is preferred because renal nociception is conducted multi-segmentally and chronically ill ESRD patients have labile psychological profile. Present study compared the efficacy ofdexmedetomidine with fentanyl administered via intravenous and epidural route before induction of general anesthesia.
Methods: Prospective, double blind randomized study, recruited sixty hemo-dynamically stable ESRD adults, 18-55 years, scheduled for elective live related renal transplantation. Patients randomly received intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg followed by epidural dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine or intravenous fentanyl 1 μg/kg followed by epiduralfentanyl 1 μg/kg alongwith 5 ml; 0.25% ropivacaine. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia and continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.25%; 4-8 ml/hr. Preoperative sedation, peri-operative haemodynamics, end tidal anaesthetic agent requirement, peri-operative fluid requirement, need for vasopressors, blood loss and early graft function was assessed.
Results: 80% patients receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine did not require rescue midazolam for achieving satisfactory sedation before induction of general anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced propofol and end tidal inhalational agents requirement and need for rescue analgesics. Early renal graft function (onset time of diuresis after declamping, 24 hours urine output and serum creatinine levels) was comparable. There were no adverse sequelae.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine-based anaesthetic regimen versus fentanyl-based anaesthesia provided appropriate anxiolysis and analgesia for conducting invasive procedures and subsequent epidural administration of these agents reduced anaesthetic requirement and prolonged postoperative analgesia without compromising hemodynamics and respiratory parameters. Further dose finding studies can be conducted in kidney transplant recipients.
期刊介绍:
The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.