导航辅助透视在微创直接侧位体间融合中的应用:一项尸体研究

Jonathan E. Webb MD , Gilad J. Regev MD , Steven R. Garfin MD , Choll W. Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"导航辅助透视在微创直接侧位体间融合中的应用:一项尸体研究","authors":"Jonathan E. Webb MD ,&nbsp;Gilad J. Regev MD ,&nbsp;Steven R. Garfin MD ,&nbsp;Choll W. Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by reducing the need for real-time fluoroscopy. The direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) procedure is a technique for MIS intervertebral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusions. This study assesses the use of navigation for the DLIF procedure in comparison to standard fluoroscopy (FLUORO), as well as the accuracy of the NAV MIS DLIF procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three fresh whole-body cadavers underwent multiple DLIF procedures at the T10-L5 levels via either NAV or FLUORO. Radiation exposure and surgical times were recorded and compared between groups. An additional cadaver was used to evaluate the accuracy of the NAV system for the DLIF procedure by measuring the deviation error as the surgeon worked further from the anterior superior iliac spine tracker.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Approach, discectomy, and total fluoroscopy times for FLUORO were longer than NAV (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). In contrast, the setup time was longer in NAV (<em>P</em> = .005). Cage insertion and total operating times were similar for both. Radiation exposure to the surgeon for NAV was significantly less than FLUORO (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Accuracy of the NAV system was within 1 mm for L2-5.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Navigation for the DLIF procedure is feasible. Accuracy for this procedure over the most common levels (L2-5) is likely sufficient for safe clinical application. Although initial setup times were longer with NAV, simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral imaging with the NAV system resulted in overall surgery times similar to FLUORO. Navigation minimizes fluoroscopic radiation exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><p>Navigation for the DLIF procedure is accurate and decreases radiation exposure without increasing the overall surgical time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan E. Webb MD ,&nbsp;Gilad J. Regev MD ,&nbsp;Steven R. Garfin MD ,&nbsp;Choll W. Kim MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by reducing the need for real-time fluoroscopy. The direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) procedure is a technique for MIS intervertebral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusions. This study assesses the use of navigation for the DLIF procedure in comparison to standard fluoroscopy (FLUORO), as well as the accuracy of the NAV MIS DLIF procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three fresh whole-body cadavers underwent multiple DLIF procedures at the T10-L5 levels via either NAV or FLUORO. Radiation exposure and surgical times were recorded and compared between groups. An additional cadaver was used to evaluate the accuracy of the NAV system for the DLIF procedure by measuring the deviation error as the surgeon worked further from the anterior superior iliac spine tracker.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Approach, discectomy, and total fluoroscopy times for FLUORO were longer than NAV (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). In contrast, the setup time was longer in NAV (<em>P</em> = .005). Cage insertion and total operating times were similar for both. Radiation exposure to the surgeon for NAV was significantly less than FLUORO (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Accuracy of the NAV system was within 1 mm for L2-5.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Navigation for the DLIF procedure is feasible. Accuracy for this procedure over the most common levels (L2-5) is likely sufficient for safe clinical application. Although initial setup times were longer with NAV, simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral imaging with the NAV system resulted in overall surgery times similar to FLUORO. Navigation minimizes fluoroscopic radiation exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><p>Navigation for the DLIF procedure is accurate and decreases radiation exposure without increasing the overall surgical time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景微创手术(MIS)依赖于术中透视成像进行可视化,这大大增加了辐射暴露。导航辅助透视(NAV)可以通过减少对实时透视的需求,潜在地减少辐射暴露,改善手术室环境。直接外侧椎体间融合术(DLIF)是一种MIS椎体间腰椎和胸椎体间融合术。本研究评估了与标准透视(FLUORO)相比,导航在DLIF程序中的使用,以及NAV MIS DLIF程序的准确性。方法对3具新鲜尸体进行T10-L5水平的多次DLIF手术,分别采用NAV或FLUORO。记录两组间的辐射暴露和手术时间并进行比较。另一具尸体被用来评估NAV系统用于DLIF手术的准确性,通过测量当外科医生远离髂前上棘跟踪器时的偏差误差。结果氟组入路、椎间盘切除术和全透视时间均长于NAV组(P <. 05)。相比之下,NAV的设置时间更长(P = 0.005)。两者的笼插入时间和总手术时间相似。NAV对外科医生的辐射暴露明显小于氟化(P <. 05)。L2-5的NAV系统精度在1mm以内。结论DLIF手术导航是可行的。该方法在最常见的水平(L2-5)上的准确性可能足以安全的临床应用。虽然NAV的初始设置时间较长,但NAV系统同时进行正位和侧位成像的总体手术时间与FLUORO相似。导航最大限度地减少透视辐射暴露。临床意义:DLIF手术的导航准确,在不增加总手术时间的情况下减少了辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study

Background

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by reducing the need for real-time fluoroscopy. The direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) procedure is a technique for MIS intervertebral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusions. This study assesses the use of navigation for the DLIF procedure in comparison to standard fluoroscopy (FLUORO), as well as the accuracy of the NAV MIS DLIF procedure.

Methods

Three fresh whole-body cadavers underwent multiple DLIF procedures at the T10-L5 levels via either NAV or FLUORO. Radiation exposure and surgical times were recorded and compared between groups. An additional cadaver was used to evaluate the accuracy of the NAV system for the DLIF procedure by measuring the deviation error as the surgeon worked further from the anterior superior iliac spine tracker.

Results

Approach, discectomy, and total fluoroscopy times for FLUORO were longer than NAV (P < .05). In contrast, the setup time was longer in NAV (P = .005). Cage insertion and total operating times were similar for both. Radiation exposure to the surgeon for NAV was significantly less than FLUORO (P < .05). Accuracy of the NAV system was within 1 mm for L2-5.

Conclusion

Navigation for the DLIF procedure is feasible. Accuracy for this procedure over the most common levels (L2-5) is likely sufficient for safe clinical application. Although initial setup times were longer with NAV, simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral imaging with the NAV system resulted in overall surgery times similar to FLUORO. Navigation minimizes fluoroscopic radiation exposure.

Clinical significance

Navigation for the DLIF procedure is accurate and decreases radiation exposure without increasing the overall surgical time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1