腰椎椎间孔外减压术:一项技术说明和回顾性研究,观察作为门诊手术的潜在并发症

Justin W. Miller MD , Rick C. Sasso MD
{"title":"腰椎椎间孔外减压术:一项技术说明和回顾性研究,观察作为门诊手术的潜在并发症","authors":"Justin W. Miller MD ,&nbsp;Rick C. Sasso MD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2010.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lumbar disc herniation and stenosis that results in compression of a nerve root lateral to the foramen is defined as extraforaminal. In recent years the recognition of such pathology has increased with technology and greater awareness. Various approaches and techniques have been developed for extraforaminal decompression in the lumbar region. The purpose of this study was two fold: 1) Determine the safety of treating patients operatively via a paramedian muscle splitting approach on an outpatient basis, and 2) Highlight the technical aspects of the approach to the extraforaminal region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred consecutive extraforaminal decompressions were performed from 1992 to 2007 by a single surgeon. A retrospective review was performed consisting of chart reviews. Summary statistics and the Pierson Chi-square test were used to analyze the data. The primary outcome measure was the need for hospital admission or readmission following surgical decompression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven of 100 patients (7%) were required to remain in the hospital for twenty-three hour observation due to Medicare requirements. Five (5%) of the patients originally scheduled for an outpatient procedure were converted to inpatient status due to postoperative pain. All were released within 2 days (average 1.25 days). Only one (1%) patient was readmitted for urinary retention that resolved without incident. There was no significant difference (<em>P</em> = 0.137) in complication rate between our control and those that underwent extraforaminal decompression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extraforaminal lumbar decompression as an outpatient procedure can be done safely without the need for hospital admission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.11.002","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar extraforaminal decompression: A technical note and retrospective study looking at potential complications as an outpatient procedure\",\"authors\":\"Justin W. Miller MD ,&nbsp;Rick C. Sasso MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esas.2010.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lumbar disc herniation and stenosis that results in compression of a nerve root lateral to the foramen is defined as extraforaminal. In recent years the recognition of such pathology has increased with technology and greater awareness. Various approaches and techniques have been developed for extraforaminal decompression in the lumbar region. The purpose of this study was two fold: 1) Determine the safety of treating patients operatively via a paramedian muscle splitting approach on an outpatient basis, and 2) Highlight the technical aspects of the approach to the extraforaminal region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred consecutive extraforaminal decompressions were performed from 1992 to 2007 by a single surgeon. A retrospective review was performed consisting of chart reviews. Summary statistics and the Pierson Chi-square test were used to analyze the data. The primary outcome measure was the need for hospital admission or readmission following surgical decompression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven of 100 patients (7%) were required to remain in the hospital for twenty-three hour observation due to Medicare requirements. Five (5%) of the patients originally scheduled for an outpatient procedure were converted to inpatient status due to postoperative pain. All were released within 2 days (average 1.25 days). Only one (1%) patient was readmitted for urinary retention that resolved without incident. There was no significant difference (<em>P</em> = 0.137) in complication rate between our control and those that underwent extraforaminal decompression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extraforaminal lumbar decompression as an outpatient procedure can be done safely without the need for hospital admission.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 4-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.11.002\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景腰椎间盘突出和狭窄导致神经根压迫到椎间孔外侧被定义为椎间孔外。近年来,对这种病理的认识随着技术和意识的提高而增加。腰椎椎间孔外减压已发展出多种入路和技术。本研究的目的有两个方面:1)确定在门诊基础上通过辅助肌裂入路手术治疗患者的安全性,2)强调椎间孔外区域入路的技术方面。方法1992 ~ 2007年,同一外科医生连续行100例椎间孔外减压术。回顾性回顾包括图表回顾。采用汇总统计和Pierson卡方检验对数据进行分析。主要结局指标是手术减压后住院或再入院的需要。结果100例患者中有7例(7%)因医保要求需住院观察23小时。5例(5%)原本安排门诊手术的患者由于术后疼痛而转为住院。所有患者均在2天内(平均1.25天)出院。只有1例(1%)患者因尿潴留而再次入院,但没有发生任何事件。对照组与椎间孔外减压组的并发症发生率无显著差异(P = 0.137)。结论椎间孔减压术作为一种门诊手术,无需住院即可安全进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lumbar extraforaminal decompression: A technical note and retrospective study looking at potential complications as an outpatient procedure

Background

Lumbar disc herniation and stenosis that results in compression of a nerve root lateral to the foramen is defined as extraforaminal. In recent years the recognition of such pathology has increased with technology and greater awareness. Various approaches and techniques have been developed for extraforaminal decompression in the lumbar region. The purpose of this study was two fold: 1) Determine the safety of treating patients operatively via a paramedian muscle splitting approach on an outpatient basis, and 2) Highlight the technical aspects of the approach to the extraforaminal region.

Methods

One hundred consecutive extraforaminal decompressions were performed from 1992 to 2007 by a single surgeon. A retrospective review was performed consisting of chart reviews. Summary statistics and the Pierson Chi-square test were used to analyze the data. The primary outcome measure was the need for hospital admission or readmission following surgical decompression.

Results

Seven of 100 patients (7%) were required to remain in the hospital for twenty-three hour observation due to Medicare requirements. Five (5%) of the patients originally scheduled for an outpatient procedure were converted to inpatient status due to postoperative pain. All were released within 2 days (average 1.25 days). Only one (1%) patient was readmitted for urinary retention that resolved without incident. There was no significant difference (P = 0.137) in complication rate between our control and those that underwent extraforaminal decompression.

Conclusions

Extraforaminal lumbar decompression as an outpatient procedure can be done safely without the need for hospital admission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1