腰椎后路脊柱融合术混合动力稳定

William R.S. Hudson MD, John Eric Gee MD, James B. Billys MD, Antonio E. Castellvi MD
{"title":"腰椎后路脊柱融合术混合动力稳定","authors":"William R.S. Hudson MD,&nbsp;John Eric Gee MD,&nbsp;James B. Billys MD,&nbsp;Antonio E. Castellvi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2011.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis has been established as the gold standard in the care of patients with degenerative disc disease. However, spinal fusion results in the elimination of motion of the functional spinal unit and has been implicated in the development of adjacent-level degeneration. Motion-preserving devices such as the dynamic rod allow for stabilization of a pathologic motion segment above a fused segment and create a transitional zone (index level) that decreases the loads applied to the supra-adjacent normal segment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institutional review board approval, 28 patients were included in this prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized clinical trial. Each subject was consented for dynamic stabilization. There was no attempt at fusion at the dynamic level. The cohort underwent a posterior lateral spinal fusion with single- or 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by use of a cage, with superior-level posterior dynamic instrumentation. Functional clinical outcomes were measured with a 100-point visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36 questionnaire. Radiographic measurements, fusion evaluation, complications, and screw loosening were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A minimum of 24 months' follow-up data included 22 patients. No device failure or screw breakage was identified. Postoperative range of motion averaged 2.5° at the index level, and the superior adjacent-level range of motion remained unchanged (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Disc height was preserved at all levels (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Of 180 screws, 6 (3%) showed radiographic loosening. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in mean postoperative visual analog scale score by 24.7 points (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and Oswestry Disability Index by 27.6 points (<em>P</em> &lt; .01), as well as the Short Form 36 physical (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and mental (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) components from baseline to 2-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our preliminary results at 2 years are satisfactory.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Ultimately, further follow-up will assess the potential for this treatment to delay adjacent-level changes in the long term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2011.01.003","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid dynamic stabilization with posterior spinal fusion in the lumbar spine\",\"authors\":\"William R.S. Hudson MD,&nbsp;John Eric Gee MD,&nbsp;James B. Billys MD,&nbsp;Antonio E. Castellvi MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esas.2011.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis has been established as the gold standard in the care of patients with degenerative disc disease. However, spinal fusion results in the elimination of motion of the functional spinal unit and has been implicated in the development of adjacent-level degeneration. Motion-preserving devices such as the dynamic rod allow for stabilization of a pathologic motion segment above a fused segment and create a transitional zone (index level) that decreases the loads applied to the supra-adjacent normal segment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institutional review board approval, 28 patients were included in this prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized clinical trial. Each subject was consented for dynamic stabilization. There was no attempt at fusion at the dynamic level. The cohort underwent a posterior lateral spinal fusion with single- or 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by use of a cage, with superior-level posterior dynamic instrumentation. Functional clinical outcomes were measured with a 100-point visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36 questionnaire. Radiographic measurements, fusion evaluation, complications, and screw loosening were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A minimum of 24 months' follow-up data included 22 patients. No device failure or screw breakage was identified. Postoperative range of motion averaged 2.5° at the index level, and the superior adjacent-level range of motion remained unchanged (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Disc height was preserved at all levels (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Of 180 screws, 6 (3%) showed radiographic loosening. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in mean postoperative visual analog scale score by 24.7 points (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and Oswestry Disability Index by 27.6 points (<em>P</em> &lt; .01), as well as the Short Form 36 physical (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) and mental (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) components from baseline to 2-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our preliminary results at 2 years are satisfactory.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Ultimately, further follow-up will assess the potential for this treatment to delay adjacent-level changes in the long term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS journal\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2011.01.003\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981011000235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981011000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

背景:固定化腰椎关节融合术已被确立为治疗退行性椎间盘疾病的金标准。然而,脊柱融合导致功能脊柱单元运动的消除,并与邻接节段退变的发展有关。运动保持装置,如动态棒,允许在融合节段上方的病理运动节段稳定,并创建一个过渡区(指数水平),减少施加在超相邻正常节段上的负荷。方法经机构审查委员会批准,28例患者纳入这项前瞻性、连续、非随机临床试验。每个受试者都同意进行动态稳定。在动态水平上没有尝试融合。该队列采用固定器进行单节段或2节段经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术,并采用高水平后路动态内固定。功能临床结果采用100分视觉模拟量表、Oswestry残疾指数和短表格36问卷进行测量。记录影像学测量、融合评估、并发症和螺钉松动情况。结果22例患者至少随访24个月。未发现设备故障或螺钉断裂。术后指数水平运动范围平均为2.5°,上位邻接水平运动范围保持不变(P >. 05)。各级椎间盘高度保持不变(P >. 05)。180颗螺钉中,6颗(3%)出现影像学松动。术后视觉模拟量表评分平均提高24.7分(P <.01), Oswestry残疾指数下降27.6点(P <.01),以及短表36物理(P <.01)和精神(P <.05),从基线到2年随访。结论2年的初步结果令人满意。最终,进一步的随访将评估这种治疗在长期内延缓邻接水平改变的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid dynamic stabilization with posterior spinal fusion in the lumbar spine

Background

Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis has been established as the gold standard in the care of patients with degenerative disc disease. However, spinal fusion results in the elimination of motion of the functional spinal unit and has been implicated in the development of adjacent-level degeneration. Motion-preserving devices such as the dynamic rod allow for stabilization of a pathologic motion segment above a fused segment and create a transitional zone (index level) that decreases the loads applied to the supra-adjacent normal segment.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, 28 patients were included in this prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized clinical trial. Each subject was consented for dynamic stabilization. There was no attempt at fusion at the dynamic level. The cohort underwent a posterior lateral spinal fusion with single- or 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by use of a cage, with superior-level posterior dynamic instrumentation. Functional clinical outcomes were measured with a 100-point visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36 questionnaire. Radiographic measurements, fusion evaluation, complications, and screw loosening were recorded.

Results

A minimum of 24 months' follow-up data included 22 patients. No device failure or screw breakage was identified. Postoperative range of motion averaged 2.5° at the index level, and the superior adjacent-level range of motion remained unchanged (P > .05). Disc height was preserved at all levels (P > .05). Of 180 screws, 6 (3%) showed radiographic loosening. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in mean postoperative visual analog scale score by 24.7 points (P < .01) and Oswestry Disability Index by 27.6 points (P < .01), as well as the Short Form 36 physical (P < .01) and mental (P < .05) components from baseline to 2-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results at 2 years are satisfactory.

Clinical Relevance

Ultimately, further follow-up will assess the potential for this treatment to delay adjacent-level changes in the long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1