五种抗结核药物治疗耐多药结核病的比较疗效和可接受性:网络荟萃分析。

Journal of clinical bioinformatics Pub Date : 2015-04-28 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x
Huaidong Wang, Xiaotian Zhang, Yuanxiang Bai, Zipeng Duan, Yan Lin, Guoqing Wang, Fan Li
{"title":"五种抗结核药物治疗耐多药结核病的比较疗效和可接受性:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Huaidong Wang,&nbsp;Xiaotian Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanxiang Bai,&nbsp;Zipeng Duan,&nbsp;Yan Lin,&nbsp;Guoqing Wang,&nbsp;Fan Li","doi":"10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a serious form of tuberculosis (TB). There is no recognized effective treatment for MDR-TB, although there are a number of publications that have reported positive results for MDR-TB. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and acceptability of potential antitubercular drugs. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and acceptability of five antitubercular drugs, bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB. We included eleven suitable trials from nine journal articles and six clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, with data for 1472 participants. Bedaquiline (odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.43), delamanid (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.89) and moxifloxacin (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01, 7.31) were significantly more effective than placebo. For efficacy, the results indicated no statistical significance between each antitubercular drug. For acceptability, the results indicated no statistically significant difference between each compared intervention. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that any one of the five antitubercular drugs (bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin) has superior efficacy compared to the others. </p>","PeriodicalId":73663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and acceptability of five anti-tubercular drugs in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Huaidong Wang,&nbsp;Xiaotian Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanxiang Bai,&nbsp;Zipeng Duan,&nbsp;Yan Lin,&nbsp;Guoqing Wang,&nbsp;Fan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a serious form of tuberculosis (TB). There is no recognized effective treatment for MDR-TB, although there are a number of publications that have reported positive results for MDR-TB. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and acceptability of potential antitubercular drugs. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and acceptability of five antitubercular drugs, bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB. We included eleven suitable trials from nine journal articles and six clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, with data for 1472 participants. Bedaquiline (odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.43), delamanid (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.89) and moxifloxacin (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01, 7.31) were significantly more effective than placebo. For efficacy, the results indicated no statistical significance between each antitubercular drug. For acceptability, the results indicated no statistically significant difference between each compared intervention. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that any one of the five antitubercular drugs (bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin) has superior efficacy compared to the others. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)是结核病的一种严重形式。目前还没有公认的耐多药结核病的有效治疗方法,尽管有一些出版物报道了耐多药结核病的积极结果。我们进行了一项网络荟萃分析,以评估潜在抗结核药物的疗效和可接受性。我们对随机对照临床试验进行了网络meta分析,比较贝达喹啉、德拉马尼、左氧氟沙星、甲硝唑和莫西沙星五种抗结核药物治疗耐多药结核病的疗效和可接受性。我们从9篇期刊文章中纳入了11项合适的试验,并从ClinicalTrials.gov网站上纳入了6项临床试验,共有1472名参与者的数据。贝达喹啉(比值比[OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.43)、德拉马尼(比值比[OR] 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.89)和莫西沙星(比值比[OR] 2.47, 95% CI 1.01, 7.31)显著优于安慰剂。疗效方面,各抗结核药物间比较无统计学意义。对于可接受性,结果显示各比较干预之间无统计学显著差异。没有足够的证据表明五种抗结核药物(贝达喹啉、德拉马尼、左氧氟沙星、甲硝唑和莫西沙星)中的任何一种比其他药物具有更好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of five anti-tubercular drugs in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis.

Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a serious form of tuberculosis (TB). There is no recognized effective treatment for MDR-TB, although there are a number of publications that have reported positive results for MDR-TB. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and acceptability of potential antitubercular drugs. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and acceptability of five antitubercular drugs, bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB. We included eleven suitable trials from nine journal articles and six clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, with data for 1472 participants. Bedaquiline (odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.43), delamanid (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.89) and moxifloxacin (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01, 7.31) were significantly more effective than placebo. For efficacy, the results indicated no statistical significance between each antitubercular drug. For acceptability, the results indicated no statistically significant difference between each compared intervention. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that any one of the five antitubercular drugs (bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin) has superior efficacy compared to the others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical research informatics (CRI): overview over new tools and services First Clinical Research Informatics (CRI) Solutions Day: advanced IT support from EU projects for clinical trials Mobile eHealth solution (ePRO) EHR4CR local workbench TRANSFoRm Data quality tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1