科学哲学在负责任的研究与创新(RRI)中的作用:以纳米医学为例。

IF 3.1 Q1 Arts and Humanities Life Sciences, Society and Policy Pub Date : 2014-12-01 Epub Date: 2014-04-26 DOI:10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8

Gry Oftedal

{"title":"科学哲学在负责任的研究与创新(RRI)中的作用:以纳米医学为例。","authors":"Gry Oftedal","doi":"10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) of life sciences and new technologies has mainly been focused on impacts and consequences, while the emerging framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) focuses rather on increased involvement and reflexivity in research processes to foster science and technology that better answers the needs of society. I argue that philosophy of science should be a central feature of RRI and demonstrate how the philosophy of science can contribute in this sense. I show how investigating basic assumptions in research, here exemplified by reductive assumptions in causal modeling, can have important ethical and societal implications. ","PeriodicalId":37861,"journal":{"name":"Life Sciences, Society and Policy","volume":"10 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of philosophy of science in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): the case of nanomedicine.\",\"authors\":\"Gry Oftedal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) of life sciences and new technologies has mainly been focused on impacts and consequences, while the emerging framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) focuses rather on increased involvement and reflexivity in research processes to foster science and technology that better answers the needs of society. I argue that philosophy of science should be a central feature of RRI and demonstrate how the philosophy of science can contribute in this sense. I show how investigating basic assumptions in research, here exemplified by reductive assumptions in causal modeling, can have important ethical and societal implications. \",\"PeriodicalId\":37861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life Sciences, Society and Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life Sciences, Society and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Sciences, Society and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0005-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 19

摘要

生命科学和新技术的伦理、法律和社会方面(ELSA)研究主要集中在影响和后果上，而新兴的负责任研究与创新(RRI)框架更侧重于在研究过程中增加参与和反思，以促进科学和技术更好地满足社会需求。我认为科学哲学应该是RRI的核心特征，并论证了科学哲学如何在这方面做出贡献。我展示了如何在研究中调查基本假设，这里以因果模型中的简化假设为例，可以产生重要的伦理和社会影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The role of philosophy of science in Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): the case of nanomedicine.

Research on ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) of life sciences and new technologies has mainly been focused on impacts and consequences, while the emerging framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) focuses rather on increased involvement and reflexivity in research processes to foster science and technology that better answers the needs of society. I argue that philosophy of science should be a central feature of RRI and demonstrate how the philosophy of science can contribute in this sense. I show how investigating basic assumptions in research, here exemplified by reductive assumptions in causal modeling, can have important ethical and societal implications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Life Sciences, Society and Policy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

18 weeks

期刊介绍： The purpose of Life Sciences, Society and Policy (LSSP) is to analyse social, ethical and legal dimensions of the most dynamic branches of life sciences and technologies, and to discuss ways to foster responsible innovation, sustainable development and user-driven social policies. LSSP provides an academic forum for engaged scholarship at the intersection of life sciences, philosophy, bioethics, science studies and policy research, and covers a broad area of inquiry both in emerging research areas such as genomics, bioinformatics, biophysics, molecular engineering, nanotechnology and synthetic biology, and in more applied fields such as translational medicine, food science, environmental science, climate studies, research on animals, sustainability, science education and others. The goal is to produce insights, tools and recommendations that are relevant not only for academic researchers and teachers, but also for civil society, policy makers and industry, as well as for professionals in education, health care and the media, thus contributing to better research practices, better policies, and a more sustainable global society.