描述影响日本家庭医生会诊中制定共享议程过程的因素:一项定性研究。

Q1 Medicine Asia Pacific Family Medicine Pub Date : 2015-06-05 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6
Michiko Goto, Shoji Yokoya, Yousuke Takemura, Alberto Alexander Gayle, Tsukasa Tsuda
{"title":"描述影响日本家庭医生会诊中制定共享议程过程的因素:一项定性研究。","authors":"Michiko Goto,&nbsp;Shoji Yokoya,&nbsp;Yousuke Takemura,&nbsp;Alberto Alexander Gayle,&nbsp;Tsukasa Tsuda","doi":"10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients cannot always share all necessary relevant information with doctors during medical consultations. Regardless, in order to ensure the best quality consultation and care, it is imperative that a doctor clearly understands each patient's agenda. The purpose of this study was to analyze the process of developing a shared-agenda during family physician consultations in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 15 first time patients visiting the outpatient clinic of the Department of Family Medicine in the hospital chosen for the investigation, and the 8 family physicians who examined them. In total we observed 16 consultations. We analyzed both patients' and doctors' narratives using a modified grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients, we found four main factors that influenced the process of making a shared-agenda: past medical experiences, undisclosed but relevant information, relationship with the family physician, and the patient's own explanatory model. In addition, we found five factors that influenced the shared agenda making process for family physicians: understanding the patient's explanatory model, constructing the patient-doctor relationship, physical examination centered around the patient's explanatory model, discussion-styled explanation, and self-reflection on action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that patient satisfaction would be increased if family physicians are proactive in considering these factors with respect to both the patient's agenda, and their own.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Describing the factors that influence the process of making a shared-agenda in Japanese family physician consultations: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Michiko Goto,&nbsp;Shoji Yokoya,&nbsp;Yousuke Takemura,&nbsp;Alberto Alexander Gayle,&nbsp;Tsukasa Tsuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients cannot always share all necessary relevant information with doctors during medical consultations. Regardless, in order to ensure the best quality consultation and care, it is imperative that a doctor clearly understands each patient's agenda. The purpose of this study was to analyze the process of developing a shared-agenda during family physician consultations in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 15 first time patients visiting the outpatient clinic of the Department of Family Medicine in the hospital chosen for the investigation, and the 8 family physicians who examined them. In total we observed 16 consultations. We analyzed both patients' and doctors' narratives using a modified grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients, we found four main factors that influenced the process of making a shared-agenda: past medical experiences, undisclosed but relevant information, relationship with the family physician, and the patient's own explanatory model. In addition, we found five factors that influenced the shared agenda making process for family physicians: understanding the patient's explanatory model, constructing the patient-doctor relationship, physical examination centered around the patient's explanatory model, discussion-styled explanation, and self-reflection on action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that patient satisfaction would be increased if family physicians are proactive in considering these factors with respect to both the patient's agenda, and their own.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-015-0023-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在医疗咨询中,患者不能总是与医生分享所有必要的相关信息。无论如何,为了确保最好的咨询和护理质量,医生必须清楚地了解每个病人的日程。本研究的目的是分析日本家庭医生会诊时制定共同议程的过程。方法:选取调查医院家庭内科门诊首次就诊的患者15例,对其进行检查的家庭医生8名。我们总共观察了16次咨询。我们用一种改良的扎根理论方法分析了病人和医生的叙述。结果:对于患者,我们发现了四个主要因素影响共享议程的过程:过去的医疗经历,未公开但相关的信息,与家庭医生的关系,以及患者自己的解释模型。此外,我们还发现了影响家庭医生共同议程制定过程的五个因素:理解患者的解释模式、构建医患关系、以患者的解释模式为中心的体检、讨论式解释和对行动的自我反思。结论:研究结果表明,如果家庭医生在考虑患者和他们自己的议程时积极主动地考虑这些因素,患者满意度将会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Describing the factors that influence the process of making a shared-agenda in Japanese family physician consultations: a qualitative study.

Background: Patients cannot always share all necessary relevant information with doctors during medical consultations. Regardless, in order to ensure the best quality consultation and care, it is imperative that a doctor clearly understands each patient's agenda. The purpose of this study was to analyze the process of developing a shared-agenda during family physician consultations in Japan.

Methods: We interviewed 15 first time patients visiting the outpatient clinic of the Department of Family Medicine in the hospital chosen for the investigation, and the 8 family physicians who examined them. In total we observed 16 consultations. We analyzed both patients' and doctors' narratives using a modified grounded theory approach.

Results: For patients, we found four main factors that influenced the process of making a shared-agenda: past medical experiences, undisclosed but relevant information, relationship with the family physician, and the patient's own explanatory model. In addition, we found five factors that influenced the shared agenda making process for family physicians: understanding the patient's explanatory model, constructing the patient-doctor relationship, physical examination centered around the patient's explanatory model, discussion-styled explanation, and self-reflection on action.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that patient satisfaction would be increased if family physicians are proactive in considering these factors with respect to both the patient's agenda, and their own.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Family Medicine
Asia Pacific Family Medicine Medicine-Family Practice
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards self-medication for their children: a cross-sectional study from Palestine Polarized Dermoscopy Facilitates Diagnosis and Treatment of Plantar Pseudohirsutism Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan The Food poisoning outbreak caused by diarrhoeal Bacillus Cereus in Tegalkenongo Village, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a retrospective study Sharing experience from Chinese General Practitioners to International colleagues on how to tackle COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1