在临床环境中使用安慰剂药物——智力游戏还是可能的现实?

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Uri Nitzan, Yuval Bloch, Shmuel Fennig
{"title":"在临床环境中使用安慰剂药物——智力游戏还是可能的现实?","authors":"Uri Nitzan,&nbsp;Yuval Bloch,&nbsp;Shmuel Fennig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior to the development of the pharmaceutical industry and the advocacy of evidence based medicine in the late 20th century, placebo treatments were commonly used by physicians. In current clinical practice, neither a physician's confidence in the efficacy of a specific treatment nor his personal ethical norms are any longer sufficient to initiate a given therapy. We will discuss whether placebo treatments can be ethically used in clinical practice as an alternative to standard therapy, and propose an innovative conceptualization of the factors involved in the exclusion of placebo treatments from the clinical setting. Patient-related ethical and interpersonal arguments and physician-related legal and ideological arguments concerning placebo usage are presented. We describe current use of placebo treatments in the healthcare system and suggest that placebo therapy thrives and that its therapeutic efficacy is widely acknowledged. There is currently \"underground\" use of placebo medication, open label placebo trials, and innovative approaches to informed consent to facilitate ethical prescription of placebo therapy. Finally, using the specific example of treatment for depression, we demonstrate how the arguments against placebo use might be undermined, to retrieve the legitimacy of placebo therapy. </p>","PeriodicalId":49288,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","volume":"51 3","pages":"182-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using placebo medications in the clinical setting - an intellectual game or a possible reality?\",\"authors\":\"Uri Nitzan,&nbsp;Yuval Bloch,&nbsp;Shmuel Fennig\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior to the development of the pharmaceutical industry and the advocacy of evidence based medicine in the late 20th century, placebo treatments were commonly used by physicians. In current clinical practice, neither a physician's confidence in the efficacy of a specific treatment nor his personal ethical norms are any longer sufficient to initiate a given therapy. We will discuss whether placebo treatments can be ethically used in clinical practice as an alternative to standard therapy, and propose an innovative conceptualization of the factors involved in the exclusion of placebo treatments from the clinical setting. Patient-related ethical and interpersonal arguments and physician-related legal and ideological arguments concerning placebo usage are presented. We describe current use of placebo treatments in the healthcare system and suggest that placebo therapy thrives and that its therapeutic efficacy is widely acknowledged. There is currently \\\"underground\\\" use of placebo medication, open label placebo trials, and innovative approaches to informed consent to facilitate ethical prescription of placebo therapy. Finally, using the specific example of treatment for depression, we demonstrate how the arguments against placebo use might be undermined, to retrieve the legitimacy of placebo therapy. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"182-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪后期制药工业发展和循证医学的倡导之前,安慰剂治疗通常被医生使用。在目前的临床实践中,医生对特定治疗效果的信心和他个人的道德规范都不再足以启动给定的治疗。我们将讨论安慰剂治疗是否可以在临床实践中作为标准治疗的替代方案在伦理上使用,并提出一个创新的概念化的因素,涉及到从临床环境中排除安慰剂治疗。患者相关的伦理和人际争论和医生相关的法律和意识形态争论有关安慰剂的使用提出。我们描述了目前在医疗保健系统中使用的安慰剂治疗,并建议安慰剂治疗蓬勃发展,其治疗效果得到广泛认可。目前有“地下”使用安慰剂药物、公开标签安慰剂试验和创新的知情同意方法,以促进安慰剂治疗的伦理处方。最后,以治疗抑郁症的具体例子为例,我们展示了反对使用安慰剂的论点是如何被削弱的,以恢复安慰剂治疗的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using placebo medications in the clinical setting - an intellectual game or a possible reality?

Prior to the development of the pharmaceutical industry and the advocacy of evidence based medicine in the late 20th century, placebo treatments were commonly used by physicians. In current clinical practice, neither a physician's confidence in the efficacy of a specific treatment nor his personal ethical norms are any longer sufficient to initiate a given therapy. We will discuss whether placebo treatments can be ethically used in clinical practice as an alternative to standard therapy, and propose an innovative conceptualization of the factors involved in the exclusion of placebo treatments from the clinical setting. Patient-related ethical and interpersonal arguments and physician-related legal and ideological arguments concerning placebo usage are presented. We describe current use of placebo treatments in the healthcare system and suggest that placebo therapy thrives and that its therapeutic efficacy is widely acknowledged. There is currently "underground" use of placebo medication, open label placebo trials, and innovative approaches to informed consent to facilitate ethical prescription of placebo therapy. Finally, using the specific example of treatment for depression, we demonstrate how the arguments against placebo use might be undermined, to retrieve the legitimacy of placebo therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: THE ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY publishes original articles dealing with the all bio-psycho-social aspects of psychiatry. While traditionally the journal has published manuscripts relating to mobility, relocation, acculturation, ethnicity, stress situations in war and peace, victimology and mental health in developing countries, papers addressing all aspects of the psychiatry including neuroscience, biological psychiatry, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy and ethics are welcome. The Editor also welcomes pertinent book reviews and correspondence. Preference is given to research reports of no more than 5,000 words not including abstract, text, references, tables and figures. There should be no more than 40 references and 4 tables or figures. Brief reports (1,500 words, 5 references) are considered if they have heuristic value. Books to be considered for review should be sent to the editorial office. Selected book reviews are invited by the editor.
期刊最新文献
Evidence Basis for Psychodynamic Self-Psychology in Eating Disorders - A Review Paper. Perversion and the universal law. Does Individual Stigma Predict Mental Health Funding Attitudes? Toward an Understanding of Resource Allocation and Social Climate. Mental Illness Stigma Expressed by Police to Police. 'People with Problems, Not Patients with Illnesses': Using Psychosocial Frameworks to Reduce the Stigma of Psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1