{"title":"多焦与调节型人工晶体植入术后视功能的比较。","authors":"Weimin Tang, Shaoxiong Zhuang, Guoan Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare early visual function between patients undergoing phacoemulsification combined with multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 112 patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification in our hospital were recruited for this study and randomly assigned into multifocal (56 eyes; ZAM00 group) and accommodative (56 eyes; FLEX group) intraocular lens groups. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were statistically compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found in uncorrected distant visual acuity between the ZMA00 and FLEX groups at 1 week, or 1, 3, and 6 months after operation (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 6 months, no statistical significance was noted in distant and intermediate best-corrected visual acuity or in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the ZMA00 group were superior to their counterparts in the FLEX group regarding near best corrected visual acuity, reading speed, and spectacle independence (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZMA00 and FLEX IOL implantation can provide excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity for patients with age-related cataract. ZMA00 IOL is superior to FLEX in terms of near visual acuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12096,"journal":{"name":"眼科学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of visual function after multifocal and accommodative IOL implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Weimin Tang, Shaoxiong Zhuang, Guoan Liu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare early visual function between patients undergoing phacoemulsification combined with multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 112 patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification in our hospital were recruited for this study and randomly assigned into multifocal (56 eyes; ZAM00 group) and accommodative (56 eyes; FLEX group) intraocular lens groups. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were statistically compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found in uncorrected distant visual acuity between the ZMA00 and FLEX groups at 1 week, or 1, 3, and 6 months after operation (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 6 months, no statistical significance was noted in distant and intermediate best-corrected visual acuity or in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the ZMA00 group were superior to their counterparts in the FLEX group regarding near best corrected visual acuity, reading speed, and spectacle independence (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZMA00 and FLEX IOL implantation can provide excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity for patients with age-related cataract. ZMA00 IOL is superior to FLEX in terms of near visual acuity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"眼科学报\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"眼科学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of visual function after multifocal and accommodative IOL implantation.
Purpose: To compare early visual function between patients undergoing phacoemulsification combined with multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.
Methods: A total of 112 patients with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification in our hospital were recruited for this study and randomly assigned into multifocal (56 eyes; ZAM00 group) and accommodative (56 eyes; FLEX group) intraocular lens groups. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were statistically compared between the two groups.
Results: No significant difference was found in uncorrected distant visual acuity between the ZMA00 and FLEX groups at 1 week, or 1, 3, and 6 months after operation (all P > 0.05). At postoperative 6 months, no statistical significance was noted in distant and intermediate best-corrected visual acuity or in contrast sensitivity between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Patients in the ZMA00 group were superior to their counterparts in the FLEX group regarding near best corrected visual acuity, reading speed, and spectacle independence (all P < 0.05).
Conclusion: ZMA00 and FLEX IOL implantation can provide excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity for patients with age-related cataract. ZMA00 IOL is superior to FLEX in terms of near visual acuity.
期刊介绍:
Eye science was founded in 1985. It is a national medical journal supervised by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University, and hosted by Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center (in October 2020, it was changed from a quarterly to a monthly, with the publication number: ISSN: 1000-4432; CN: 44-1119/R). It is edited by Ge Jian, former dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, Liu Yizhi, director and dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, and Lin Haotian, deputy director of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, as executive editor. It mainly reports on new developments and trends in the field of ophthalmology at home and abroad, focusing on basic research in ophthalmology, clinical experience, and theoretical knowledge and technical operations related to epidemiology. It has been included in important databases at home and abroad, such as Chemical Abstract (CA), China Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Core Journals (Selection) Database (Wanfang), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP).