激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术和经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术术后疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机配对的双侧眼研究。

眼科学报 Pub Date : 2014-09-01
Dongmei Wang, Guangsheng Chen, Liusong Tang, Qiaoling Li
{"title":"激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术和经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术术后疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机配对的双侧眼研究。","authors":"Dongmei Wang,&nbsp;Guangsheng Chen,&nbsp;Liusong Tang,&nbsp;Qiaoling Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":12096,"journal":{"name":"眼科学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, random paired bilateral eye study.\",\"authors\":\"Dongmei Wang,&nbsp;Guangsheng Chen,&nbsp;Liusong Tang,&nbsp;Qiaoling Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"眼科学报\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"眼科学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术(LASEK)和经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术(T-PRK,两步手术)术后疼痛及减轻术后主观疼痛。方法:将30例近视或近视散光患者(60只眼)连续纳入前瞻性、随机配对研究。患者一只眼接受LASEK,另一只眼接受T-PRK。术后第1、2、3天疼痛程度评分为0-10分。术后1个月和3个月评估未矫正视力(UCVA)和角膜上皮下混浊度。结果:所有患者术后第4天疼痛缓解,术后4 ~ 5天角膜上皮愈合,及时摘掉隐形眼镜。术后1天,LASEK组患者主观疼痛评分平均为3.2±1.88分,T-PRK组患者主观疼痛评分平均为4.43±1.61分(P = 0.008)。术后2、3 d两组间差异无统计学意义。术后3个月,LASEK组中UCVA≥0.8的比例为100%,T-PRK组为96.7% (P = 0.24), LASEK组中UCVA≥1.0的比例为93.3%,T-PRK组为90% (P = 0.64)。在LASEK组中,T-PRK组的角膜雾度值分别为0.26±0.21和0.27±0.25 (P = 0.877)。结论:两组患者术后3个月视力均良好。与T-PRK组相比,LASEK组患者的不适较少,这可能与角膜上皮活性有关。术后3天T-PRK组主观疼痛变化曲线较为平缓稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, random paired bilateral eye study.

Purpose: To compare postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK, two-step surgery) and alleviate postoperative subjective pain.

Methods: Thirty patients (60 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were consecutively recruited into this prospective, randomized paired study. Patients underwent LASEK in one eye, and T-PRK in the other. The degree of pain was rated on a scale of 0-10 on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and subepithelial corneal haze were assessed at postoperative 1 and 3 months.

Results: The pain was relieved on the 4th postoperative day in all patients, healing of corneal epithelium was observed at 4-5 days after surgery and contact lenses were removed promptly. At postoperative 1 day, the mean subjective pain score in the LASEK group was 3.2 ± 1.88 and 4.43 ± 1.61 in T-PRK group (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found between two groups on postoperative 2 and 3 days. At postoperative 3 months, the percentage of UCVA ≥ 0.8 in the LASEK group was 100% and 96.7% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.24), 93.3% of patients in the LASEK with UCVA ≥ 1.0 and 90% in the T-PRK group (P = 0.64). In the LASEK group, the value of corneal haze was 0.26 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25 in the T-PRK group (P = 0.877).

Conclusion: Good visual acuity was obtained in both groups at postoperative 3 months. Compared with those in the T-PRK group, patients undergoing had less discomfort in the LASEK group, which may be associated with corneal epithelial activity. The changing curve of subjective pain in the T-PRK group was relatively flat and stable at postoperative 3 days.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1312
期刊介绍: Eye science was founded in 1985. It is a national medical journal supervised by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University, and hosted by Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center (in October 2020, it was changed from a quarterly to a monthly, with the publication number: ISSN: 1000-4432; CN: 44-1119/R). It is edited by Ge Jian, former dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, Liu Yizhi, director and dean of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, and Lin Haotian, deputy director of Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan Eye Center, as executive editor. It mainly reports on new developments and trends in the field of ophthalmology at home and abroad, focusing on basic research in ophthalmology, clinical experience, and theoretical knowledge and technical operations related to epidemiology. It has been included in important databases at home and abroad, such as Chemical Abstract (CA), China Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Core Journals (Selection) Database (Wanfang), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP).
期刊最新文献
Uveitis secondary to cancer therapeutics Optical coherence tomography angiography of non-exudative choroidal neovascularization. Application of visual electrophysiology for the diagnosis and treatment of cataracts. Intravitreal aflibercept for rubeosis iridis secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Approved pharmacotherapy for myopic choroidal neovascularization: a review of randomized controlled trials in ranibizumab and aflibercept.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1