故意自残(和企图自杀)。

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-05-28
G Mustafa Soomro, Sara Kakhi
{"title":"故意自残(和企图自杀)。","authors":"G Mustafa Soomro,&nbsp;Sara Kakhi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lifetime prevalence of deliberate self-harm is about 3% to 5% of the population in Europe and the US, and has been increasing. Familial, biological, and psychosocial factors may contribute. Risks are higher in women and young adults, people who are socially isolated or deprived, and people with psychiatric or personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of non-pharmacological treatments for deliberate self-harm in adolescents and adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: cognitive therapy; continuity of care; dialectical behavioural therapy; emergency card; hospital admission; intensive outpatient follow-up plus outreach; nurse-led case management; problem-solving therapy; psychodynamic interpersonal therapy; and telephone contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451502/pdf/2015-1012.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberate self-harm (and attempted suicide).\",\"authors\":\"G Mustafa Soomro,&nbsp;Sara Kakhi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lifetime prevalence of deliberate self-harm is about 3% to 5% of the population in Europe and the US, and has been increasing. Familial, biological, and psychosocial factors may contribute. Risks are higher in women and young adults, people who are socially isolated or deprived, and people with psychiatric or personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of non-pharmacological treatments for deliberate self-harm in adolescents and adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: cognitive therapy; continuity of care; dialectical behavioural therapy; emergency card; hospital admission; intensive outpatient follow-up plus outreach; nurse-led case management; problem-solving therapy; psychodynamic interpersonal therapy; and telephone contact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451502/pdf/2015-1012.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲和美国,故意自残的终生患病率约为人口的3%至5%,并且一直在增加。家族、生物和社会心理因素都可能起作用。妇女和年轻人、社会孤立或被剥夺权利的人以及患有精神或人格障碍的人的风险更高。方法和结果:我们进行了一项系统回顾,旨在回答以下临床问题:青少年和成人故意自残的非药物治疗效果如何?我们检索了截至2013年8月的Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据综述定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取最新版本的评论)。我们纳入了来自相关组织的危害警报,如美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和英国药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)。结果:纳入22项研究。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评价。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们介绍了以下干预措施的有效性和安全性:认知疗法;护理的连续性;辩证行为疗法;紧急卡;住院;强化门诊随访加外展;护士主导的病例管理;解决问题的治疗;心理动力人际治疗;还有电话联系方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deliberate self-harm (and attempted suicide).

Introduction: The lifetime prevalence of deliberate self-harm is about 3% to 5% of the population in Europe and the US, and has been increasing. Familial, biological, and psychosocial factors may contribute. Risks are higher in women and young adults, people who are socially isolated or deprived, and people with psychiatric or personality disorders.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of non-pharmacological treatments for deliberate self-harm in adolescents and adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results: Twenty-two studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: cognitive therapy; continuity of care; dialectical behavioural therapy; emergency card; hospital admission; intensive outpatient follow-up plus outreach; nurse-led case management; problem-solving therapy; psychodynamic interpersonal therapy; and telephone contact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute kidney injury. Bacterial conjunctivitis. Shoulder pain. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pelvic inflammatory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1