肌瘤(子宫肌瘤病、平滑肌瘤)。

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-06-02
Anne Lethaby, Beverley Vollenhoven
{"title":"肌瘤(子宫肌瘤病、平滑肌瘤)。","authors":"Anne Lethaby,&nbsp;Beverley Vollenhoven","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Between 50% and 77% of women may have fibroids, depending on the method of diagnosis used. Fibroids may be asymptomatic, or may present with menorrhagia, pain, mass and pressure effects, infertility, or recurrent pregnancy loss. Risk factors for fibroids include obesity, having no children, and no long-term use of the oral contraceptive pill. Fibroids tend to shrink or fibrose after the menopause.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of surgical/interventional radiological treatments in women with fibroids? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus no/sham treatment; magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus other interventions (hysterectomy, myomectomy, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser); uterine artery embolisation versus no/sham treatment; uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus myomectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus other interventions (magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser).</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451527/pdf/2015-0814.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fibroids (uterine myomatosis, leiomyomas).\",\"authors\":\"Anne Lethaby,&nbsp;Beverley Vollenhoven\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Between 50% and 77% of women may have fibroids, depending on the method of diagnosis used. Fibroids may be asymptomatic, or may present with menorrhagia, pain, mass and pressure effects, infertility, or recurrent pregnancy loss. Risk factors for fibroids include obesity, having no children, and no long-term use of the oral contraceptive pill. Fibroids tend to shrink or fibrose after the menopause.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of surgical/interventional radiological treatments in women with fibroids? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus no/sham treatment; magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus other interventions (hysterectomy, myomectomy, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser); uterine artery embolisation versus no/sham treatment; uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus myomectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus other interventions (magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451527/pdf/2015-0814.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:根据所用的诊断方法,50%至77%的女性可能患有纤维瘤。纤维瘤可能是无症状的,也可能表现为月经过多、疼痛、肿块和压力影响、不孕或复发性流产。子宫肌瘤的危险因素包括肥胖、没有孩子以及没有长期使用口服避孕药。更年期后,纤维瘤往往会萎缩或纤维化。方法和结果:我们进行了一项系统综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:手术/介入放射学治疗对女性纤维瘤有什么影响?我们搜索了截至2014年5月的Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据审查定期更新,请查看我们的网站以获取该审查的最新版本)。我们纳入了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和英国药品和医疗保健产品监管局(MHRA)等相关组织的危害警报。结果:包括五项研究。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评估。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们提供了与以下干预措施的有效性和安全性相关的信息:磁共振引导的聚焦超声手术与非/假手术治疗;磁共振引导的聚焦超声手术与其他干预措施(子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术、宫腔镜切除术、滚球子宫内膜消融术、热气球消融术、激光热肌松解术)的比较;子宫动脉栓塞与非/假手术治疗;子宫动脉栓塞与子宫切除术;子宫动脉栓塞与子宫肌瘤切除术;子宫动脉栓塞与其他干预措施(磁共振引导聚焦超声手术、宫腔镜切除术、滚球子宫内膜消融术、热气球消融术、激光热肌松解术)的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fibroids (uterine myomatosis, leiomyomas).

Introduction: Between 50% and 77% of women may have fibroids, depending on the method of diagnosis used. Fibroids may be asymptomatic, or may present with menorrhagia, pain, mass and pressure effects, infertility, or recurrent pregnancy loss. Risk factors for fibroids include obesity, having no children, and no long-term use of the oral contraceptive pill. Fibroids tend to shrink or fibrose after the menopause.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of surgical/interventional radiological treatments in women with fibroids? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results: Five studies were included. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus no/sham treatment; magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery versus other interventions (hysterectomy, myomectomy, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser); uterine artery embolisation versus no/sham treatment; uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus myomectomy; uterine artery embolisation versus other interventions (magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery, hysteroscopic resection, rollerball endometrial ablation, thermal balloon ablation, thermal myolysis with laser).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute kidney injury. Bacterial conjunctivitis. Shoulder pain. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pelvic inflammatory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1