统一澳大利亚和新西兰的成人和儿科参考区间:以证据为基础的方法建立第一组化学分析物。

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Clinical Biochemist Reviews Pub Date : 2014-11-01
Jillian R Tate, Ken A Sikaris, Graham Rd Jones, Tina Yen, Gus Koerbin, Julie Ryan, Maxine Reed, Janice Gill, George Koumantakis, Peter Hickman, Peter Graham
{"title":"统一澳大利亚和新西兰的成人和儿科参考区间:以证据为基础的方法建立第一组化学分析物。","authors":"Jillian R Tate, Ken A Sikaris, Graham Rd Jones, Tina Yen, Gus Koerbin, Julie Ryan, Maxine Reed, Janice Gill, George Koumantakis, Peter Hickman, Peter Graham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific evidence supports the use of common reference intervals (RIs) for many general chemistry analytes, in particular those with sound calibration and traceability in place. Already the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have largely achieved harmonised RIs. Following a series of workshops organised by the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) between 2012 and 2014 at which an evidence-based approach for determination of common intervals was developed, pathology organisations in Australia and New Zealand have reached a scientific consensus on what adult and paediatric intervals we should use across Australasia. The aim of this report is to describe the processes that the AACB and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia have taken towards recommending the implementation of a first panel of common RIs for use in Australasia. </p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"35 4","pages":"213-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310061/pdf/cbr-35-213.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.\",\"authors\":\"Jillian R Tate, Ken A Sikaris, Graham Rd Jones, Tina Yen, Gus Koerbin, Julie Ryan, Maxine Reed, Janice Gill, George Koumantakis, Peter Hickman, Peter Graham\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scientific evidence supports the use of common reference intervals (RIs) for many general chemistry analytes, in particular those with sound calibration and traceability in place. Already the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have largely achieved harmonised RIs. Following a series of workshops organised by the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) between 2012 and 2014 at which an evidence-based approach for determination of common intervals was developed, pathology organisations in Australia and New Zealand have reached a scientific consensus on what adult and paediatric intervals we should use across Australasia. The aim of this report is to describe the processes that the AACB and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia have taken towards recommending the implementation of a first panel of common RIs for use in Australasia. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"213-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310061/pdf/cbr-35-213.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学证据支持对许多普通化学分析物使用通用参考区间 (RIs),特别是那些具有良好校准和可追溯性的分析物。北欧国家和英国已经在很大程度上实现了参考区间的统一。澳大拉西亚临床生物化学家协会(AACB)在2012年至2014年期间组织了一系列研讨会,制定了以证据为基础的方法来确定通用区间,之后,澳大利亚和新西兰的病理组织就我们应该在整个澳大拉西亚使用何种成人和儿科区间达成了科学共识。本报告旨在介绍澳大利亚病理学委员会和澳大拉西亚皇家病理学家学院为建议在澳大拉西亚实施首批通用 RIs 而采取的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.

Scientific evidence supports the use of common reference intervals (RIs) for many general chemistry analytes, in particular those with sound calibration and traceability in place. Already the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have largely achieved harmonised RIs. Following a series of workshops organised by the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) between 2012 and 2014 at which an evidence-based approach for determination of common intervals was developed, pathology organisations in Australia and New Zealand have reached a scientific consensus on what adult and paediatric intervals we should use across Australasia. The aim of this report is to describe the processes that the AACB and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia have taken towards recommending the implementation of a first panel of common RIs for use in Australasia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biochemist Reviews
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Disruption in Healthcare and its Impact on Laboratory Services Standardisation of Dietary and Medication Restrictions for Urine 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) Collection Diagnostic Evaluation of Renal Tubular Acidosis: A Clinical Biochemistry Perspective Digoxin: Review of Current Laboratory Practice and Considerations Proceedings of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine's 2021 Virtual Scientific Conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1