孕妇食物安全与妊娠期糖尿病的关系

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS AJP Reports Pub Date : 2022-08-25 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1751082
Shontreal Cooper, Maura Graham, Chia-Ling Kuo, Raminder Khangura, Adrienne Schmidt, Stephanie Bakaysa
{"title":"孕妇食物安全与妊娠期糖尿病的关系","authors":"Shontreal Cooper,&nbsp;Maura Graham,&nbsp;Chia-Ling Kuo,&nbsp;Raminder Khangura,&nbsp;Adrienne Schmidt,&nbsp;Stephanie Bakaysa","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1751082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective were to: (1) evaluate associations between food security and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and (2) evaluate if women in food insecure (FI) households had adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This was an observational study from October 2018 until September 2019. Postpartum resident clinic patients who delivered term, singleton infant at 37 weeks' or longer gestation were screened. Participants completed a survey using the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (US HFSSM). Survey responses were classified as: food secure (FS) and FI (marginal, low, very low FS). The primary outcome was GDM. Our secondary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions for hypoglycemia. We evaluated the rate of GDM in FS and FI groups. Demographic data included: prepregnancy body mass index, total weight gain during pregnancy, birth weight, and mode of delivery. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between food insecurity and GDM. A <i>p</i> -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were 150 patients screened to participate; of these, 70 patients were enrolled (36 GDM and 34 without GDM [NGDM]). More patients in FI households, 71% ( <i>n</i>  = 17), were diagnosed with GDM, compared with 33% ( <i>n</i>  = 15) in the FS (FS) households (adjusted odds ratio 7.05; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). Of patients who reported FI, 50% ( <i>n</i>  = 12) were black, 46% ( <i>n</i>  = 11) Hispanic, and 4% ( <i>n</i>  = 1) Caucasian, compared with 13% ( <i>n</i>  = 6) black, 30% ( <i>n</i>  = 14) Hispanic, and 57% ( <i>n</i>  = 26) Caucasian in patients who reported FS ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Although not significant, 25% ( <i>n</i>  = 6) of neonates from an FI household had an NICU admission for hypoglycemia compared with 7% ( <i>n</i>  = 3) from an FS household ( <i>p</i>  = 0.054). Pregnant women with GDM are more likely to experience FI than those with NGDM. Infants of mothers in FI households also had increased rates of NICU admission for hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"12 3","pages":"e131-e138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/dc/10-1055-s-0042-1751082.PMC9410985.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship between Food Security and Gestational Diabetes among Pregnant Women.\",\"authors\":\"Shontreal Cooper,&nbsp;Maura Graham,&nbsp;Chia-Ling Kuo,&nbsp;Raminder Khangura,&nbsp;Adrienne Schmidt,&nbsp;Stephanie Bakaysa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1751082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective were to: (1) evaluate associations between food security and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and (2) evaluate if women in food insecure (FI) households had adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This was an observational study from October 2018 until September 2019. Postpartum resident clinic patients who delivered term, singleton infant at 37 weeks' or longer gestation were screened. Participants completed a survey using the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (US HFSSM). Survey responses were classified as: food secure (FS) and FI (marginal, low, very low FS). The primary outcome was GDM. Our secondary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions for hypoglycemia. We evaluated the rate of GDM in FS and FI groups. Demographic data included: prepregnancy body mass index, total weight gain during pregnancy, birth weight, and mode of delivery. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between food insecurity and GDM. A <i>p</i> -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were 150 patients screened to participate; of these, 70 patients were enrolled (36 GDM and 34 without GDM [NGDM]). More patients in FI households, 71% ( <i>n</i>  = 17), were diagnosed with GDM, compared with 33% ( <i>n</i>  = 15) in the FS (FS) households (adjusted odds ratio 7.05; <i>p</i>  < 0.01). Of patients who reported FI, 50% ( <i>n</i>  = 12) were black, 46% ( <i>n</i>  = 11) Hispanic, and 4% ( <i>n</i>  = 1) Caucasian, compared with 13% ( <i>n</i>  = 6) black, 30% ( <i>n</i>  = 14) Hispanic, and 57% ( <i>n</i>  = 26) Caucasian in patients who reported FS ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Although not significant, 25% ( <i>n</i>  = 6) of neonates from an FI household had an NICU admission for hypoglycemia compared with 7% ( <i>n</i>  = 3) from an FS household ( <i>p</i>  = 0.054). Pregnant women with GDM are more likely to experience FI than those with NGDM. Infants of mothers in FI households also had increased rates of NICU admission for hypoglycemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJP Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"e131-e138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/dc/10-1055-s-0042-1751082.PMC9410985.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJP Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的是:(1)评估食品安全与诊断为妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的妇女之间的关系;(2)评估食品不安全(FI)家庭中的妇女是否有不良的孕产妇和新生儿结局。这是一项从2018年10月到2019年9月的观察性研究。产后住院门诊患者分娩足月,单胎婴儿在37周或更长妊娠筛选。参与者使用美国家庭食品安全调查模块(US HFSSM)完成了一项调查。调查答复分为:粮食安全(FS)和FI(边际、低、极低FS)。主要终点为GDM。我们的次要结局是新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)因低血糖入院。我们评估了FS组和FI组GDM的发生率。人口统计数据包括:孕前体重指数、孕期总体重增加、出生体重和分娩方式。采用logistic回归模型分析粮食不安全与GDM之间的关系。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。有150名患者被筛选参加;其中,70例患者入组(36例GDM和34例非GDM [NGDM])。FI家庭中有71% (n = 17)的患者被诊断为GDM,而FS家庭中有33% (n = 15)的患者被诊断为GDM(校正优势比7.05;p n = 12)为黑人,46% (n = 11)为西班牙裔,4% (n = 1)为白种人,相比之下,报告FS的患者中(p n = 6)来自FI家庭的新生儿因低血糖入院NICU (p = 0.054)为13% (n = 6)为黑人,30% (n = 14)为西班牙裔,57% (n = 26)为白种人。GDM孕妇比NGDM孕妇更容易发生FI。FI家庭母亲的婴儿因低血糖入院新生儿重症监护病房的比例也有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship between Food Security and Gestational Diabetes among Pregnant Women.

The objective were to: (1) evaluate associations between food security and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and (2) evaluate if women in food insecure (FI) households had adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This was an observational study from October 2018 until September 2019. Postpartum resident clinic patients who delivered term, singleton infant at 37 weeks' or longer gestation were screened. Participants completed a survey using the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (US HFSSM). Survey responses were classified as: food secure (FS) and FI (marginal, low, very low FS). The primary outcome was GDM. Our secondary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions for hypoglycemia. We evaluated the rate of GDM in FS and FI groups. Demographic data included: prepregnancy body mass index, total weight gain during pregnancy, birth weight, and mode of delivery. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between food insecurity and GDM. A p -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were 150 patients screened to participate; of these, 70 patients were enrolled (36 GDM and 34 without GDM [NGDM]). More patients in FI households, 71% ( n  = 17), were diagnosed with GDM, compared with 33% ( n  = 15) in the FS (FS) households (adjusted odds ratio 7.05; p  < 0.01). Of patients who reported FI, 50% ( n  = 12) were black, 46% ( n  = 11) Hispanic, and 4% ( n  = 1) Caucasian, compared with 13% ( n  = 6) black, 30% ( n  = 14) Hispanic, and 57% ( n  = 26) Caucasian in patients who reported FS ( p  < 0.001). Although not significant, 25% ( n  = 6) of neonates from an FI household had an NICU admission for hypoglycemia compared with 7% ( n  = 3) from an FS household ( p  = 0.054). Pregnant women with GDM are more likely to experience FI than those with NGDM. Infants of mothers in FI households also had increased rates of NICU admission for hypoglycemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
" Trying to Grab Pieces of Hope " : Exploring the Experiences of Black and Hispanic Parents following a Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosis. The Effect of Prolonged Antenatal Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Preventing Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease-A Case Series with Literature Review. A Rare Case of Fetal Neural Tube Defect; Iniencephaly Clausus. Human Milk-Derived Fortifier to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition in Uncomplicated Gastroschisis: A Case Report. Corrigendum: The Collection and Application of Autologous Amniotic Fluid to Cesarean Delivery Closure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1