近十年来经皮射频和微波消融治疗肝转移的证据。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5
Koji Tomita, Yusuke Matsui, Mayu Uka, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Takahiro Kawabata, Kazuaki Munetomo, Shoma Nagata, Toshihiro Iguchi, Takao Hiraki
{"title":"近十年来经皮射频和微波消融治疗肝转移的证据。","authors":"Koji Tomita,&nbsp;Yusuke Matsui,&nbsp;Mayu Uka,&nbsp;Noriyuki Umakoshi,&nbsp;Takahiro Kawabata,&nbsp;Kazuaki Munetomo,&nbsp;Shoma Nagata,&nbsp;Toshihiro Iguchi,&nbsp;Takao Hiraki","doi":"10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aimed to summarize the treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for metastatic liver tumors based on the findings of published studies over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Literature describing the survival outcomes of ablation therapy for liver metastases was explored using the PubMed database on April 26, 2022, and articles published in 2012 or later were selected. The included studies met the following criteria: (i) English literature, (ii) original clinical studies, and (iii) literature describing overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation for metastatic liver tumors. All case reports and cohort studies with fewer than 20 patients and those that evaluated ablation for palliative purposes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RFA was the most commonly used method for ablation, while MWA was used in several recent studies. RFA and MWA for liver metastases from various primary tumors have been reported; however, majority of the studies focused on colorectal cancer. The local control rate by RFA and MWA varied widely among the studies, ranging approximately 50-90%. Five-year survival rates of 20-60% have been reported following ablation for colorectal liver metastases by a number of studies, and several reports of 10-year survival rates were also noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparative studies of local therapies for colorectal liver metastases demonstrated that RFA provides comparable survival outcomes to surgical metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51226,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":"40 10","pages":"1035-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529678/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Tomita,&nbsp;Yusuke Matsui,&nbsp;Mayu Uka,&nbsp;Noriyuki Umakoshi,&nbsp;Takahiro Kawabata,&nbsp;Kazuaki Munetomo,&nbsp;Shoma Nagata,&nbsp;Toshihiro Iguchi,&nbsp;Takao Hiraki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aimed to summarize the treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for metastatic liver tumors based on the findings of published studies over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Literature describing the survival outcomes of ablation therapy for liver metastases was explored using the PubMed database on April 26, 2022, and articles published in 2012 or later were selected. The included studies met the following criteria: (i) English literature, (ii) original clinical studies, and (iii) literature describing overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation for metastatic liver tumors. All case reports and cohort studies with fewer than 20 patients and those that evaluated ablation for palliative purposes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RFA was the most commonly used method for ablation, while MWA was used in several recent studies. RFA and MWA for liver metastases from various primary tumors have been reported; however, majority of the studies focused on colorectal cancer. The local control rate by RFA and MWA varied widely among the studies, ranging approximately 50-90%. Five-year survival rates of 20-60% have been reported following ablation for colorectal liver metastases by a number of studies, and several reports of 10-year survival rates were also noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparative studies of local therapies for colorectal liver metastases demonstrated that RFA provides comparable survival outcomes to surgical metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"1035-1045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:本综述旨在总结经皮射频消融术(RFA)和微波消融术(MWA)治疗转移性肝肿瘤的结果,基于过去十年发表的研究结果。材料与方法:利用PubMed数据库于2022年4月26日检索描述肝转移灶消融治疗生存结局的文献,选取2012年及以后发表的文献。纳入的研究符合以下标准:(i)英文文献,(ii)原始临床研究,(iii)描述热消融治疗转移性肝肿瘤总生存期(OS)的文献。所有少于20例患者的病例报告和队列研究以及评估消融术用于姑息目的的研究均被排除在外。结果:RFA是最常用的消融术,而MWA在最近的一些研究中也被使用。各种原发肿瘤肝转移的RFA和MWA已被报道;然而,大多数研究都集中在结直肠癌上。在不同的研究中,RFA和MWA的局部控制率差异很大,约为50-90%。许多研究报道,结直肠肝转移灶消融后的5年生存率为20-60%,也注意到一些10年生存率的报道。结论:局部治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较研究表明,RFA提供了与手术转移切除术和立体定向全身放射治疗相当的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade.

Purpose: This review aimed to summarize the treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for metastatic liver tumors based on the findings of published studies over the last decade.

Materials and methods: Literature describing the survival outcomes of ablation therapy for liver metastases was explored using the PubMed database on April 26, 2022, and articles published in 2012 or later were selected. The included studies met the following criteria: (i) English literature, (ii) original clinical studies, and (iii) literature describing overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation for metastatic liver tumors. All case reports and cohort studies with fewer than 20 patients and those that evaluated ablation for palliative purposes were excluded.

Results: RFA was the most commonly used method for ablation, while MWA was used in several recent studies. RFA and MWA for liver metastases from various primary tumors have been reported; however, majority of the studies focused on colorectal cancer. The local control rate by RFA and MWA varied widely among the studies, ranging approximately 50-90%. Five-year survival rates of 20-60% have been reported following ablation for colorectal liver metastases by a number of studies, and several reports of 10-year survival rates were also noted.

Conclusion: Comparative studies of local therapies for colorectal liver metastases demonstrated that RFA provides comparable survival outcomes to surgical metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Correlation between renal ablation zone in contrast‑enhanced CT and non‑enhanced MRI during the early period following percutaneous cryoablation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases. Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade. Correction to: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases. F-18-FDG PET/CT findings of paraneoplastic dermatoses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1