血管功能曲线:困惑、澄清与新认识。

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2022-08-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Michael Y Ko, Xiaoqi Yang, Suzan Kamel-ElSayed, Serena Y Kuang
{"title":"血管功能曲线:困惑、澄清与新认识。","authors":"Michael Y Ko,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Yang,&nbsp;Suzan Kamel-ElSayed,&nbsp;Serena Y Kuang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The vascular function curve (VFC) in cardiovascular physiology describes the relationship between the <i>steady state</i> venous return (VR in L/min, in the Y-axis) and the <i>steady state</i> right atrial pressure (RAP in mmHg, in the X-axis). However, in some literature, the RAP is considered the independent variable (IV) and the VR the dependent variable (DV), whereas in other literature, the VR is the IV and the RAP the DV. Because of this confusion, when the VFC is combined with the cardiac function curve (CFC), which describes the relationship between the <i>steady state</i> cardiac output and the RAP, it is not strange that the interpretations of the combination are problematic. Hence, in this article, we will trace the origin of the inconsistency, differentiate the VFC into two types based on who created them, and differentiate the RAP into RAP as the IV and DV respectively. Through these in-depth analyses, the confusion will be clarified and new insights into the combination of a VFC with the CFC will develop.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":"12 4","pages":"254-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490163/pdf/ajcd0012-0254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular function curve: confusion, clarification and new insights.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Y Ko,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Yang,&nbsp;Suzan Kamel-ElSayed,&nbsp;Serena Y Kuang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The vascular function curve (VFC) in cardiovascular physiology describes the relationship between the <i>steady state</i> venous return (VR in L/min, in the Y-axis) and the <i>steady state</i> right atrial pressure (RAP in mmHg, in the X-axis). However, in some literature, the RAP is considered the independent variable (IV) and the VR the dependent variable (DV), whereas in other literature, the VR is the IV and the RAP the DV. Because of this confusion, when the VFC is combined with the cardiac function curve (CFC), which describes the relationship between the <i>steady state</i> cardiac output and the RAP, it is not strange that the interpretations of the combination are problematic. Hence, in this article, we will trace the origin of the inconsistency, differentiate the VFC into two types based on who created them, and differentiate the RAP into RAP as the IV and DV respectively. Through these in-depth analyses, the confusion will be clarified and new insights into the combination of a VFC with the CFC will develop.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cardiovascular disease\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"254-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490163/pdf/ajcd0012-0254.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cardiovascular disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管生理学血管功能曲线(VFC)描述稳态静脉回流(y轴为L/min, VR)与稳态右房压(x轴为mmHg, RAP)之间的关系。然而,在一些文献中,RAP被认为是自变量(IV), VR被认为是因变量(DV),而在其他文献中,VR被认为是IV, RAP被认为是DV。由于这种混淆,当VFC与描述稳态心输出量与RAP之间关系的心功能曲线(CFC)结合使用时,对这种组合的解释存在问题也就不足为奇了。因此,在本文中,我们将追溯不一致的根源,根据创建者将VFC区分为两种类型,并将RAP分别区分为作为IV和DV的RAP。通过这些深入的分析,将澄清混乱,并对VFC与CFC的结合产生新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vascular function curve: confusion, clarification and new insights.

The vascular function curve (VFC) in cardiovascular physiology describes the relationship between the steady state venous return (VR in L/min, in the Y-axis) and the steady state right atrial pressure (RAP in mmHg, in the X-axis). However, in some literature, the RAP is considered the independent variable (IV) and the VR the dependent variable (DV), whereas in other literature, the VR is the IV and the RAP the DV. Because of this confusion, when the VFC is combined with the cardiac function curve (CFC), which describes the relationship between the steady state cardiac output and the RAP, it is not strange that the interpretations of the combination are problematic. Hence, in this article, we will trace the origin of the inconsistency, differentiate the VFC into two types based on who created them, and differentiate the RAP into RAP as the IV and DV respectively. Through these in-depth analyses, the confusion will be clarified and new insights into the combination of a VFC with the CFC will develop.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following ultrathin vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A diagnostic prediction model for the early detection of heart failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A normal and particularly small (<35 mm) left atrial size measured during echocardiography suggests low likelihood of moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Exploring the impact of metabolites function on heart failure and coronary heart disease: insights from a Mendelian randomization (MR) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1