高危因素新生儿听力再筛查的筛查策略和时间点。

Q2 Medicine World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2022-04-18 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002
Qing-Xiang Zeng, Ren-Zhong Luo, Sheng-Bao Yan, Yi-Quan Tang, Rui-Jin Wen, Wen-Long Liu
{"title":"高危因素新生儿听力再筛查的筛查策略和时间点。","authors":"Qing-Xiang Zeng, Ren-Zhong Luo, Sheng-Bao Yan, Yi-Quan Tang, Rui-Jin Wen, Wen-Long Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newborn hearing screen and subsequently underwent secondary hearing tests from June 2011 to June 2018 in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred and sixty-eight newborns with high risk factors were included in the study. The 57-70 days (83.5%) and 71-84 days (83.4%) group had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days (75.8%) and < 42 days (68.3%) group. As for different screening strategies, the pass rate of OAE(otoacoustic emissions), AABR (auto auditory brainstem response) and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group, respectively. The OAE + AABR had the lowest pass rate compared to the other two modalities. When the pass rate was compared as different risk factors, the 57-70 days and 71-84 days group also had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days and < 42 days group and the pass rate had no significant differences among various risk factors group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that all the pass rate of OAE, AABR and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group with significant difference, suggesting that the delayed screening time (>57 days) may increase the re-screening pass rate and reduce anxiety of parents, which is of great significance for clinical work.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"257-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/13/WJO2-8-257.PMC9479479.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening strategy and time points for newborn hearing re-screening with high risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Qing-Xiang Zeng, Ren-Zhong Luo, Sheng-Bao Yan, Yi-Quan Tang, Rui-Jin Wen, Wen-Long Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newborn hearing screen and subsequently underwent secondary hearing tests from June 2011 to June 2018 in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred and sixty-eight newborns with high risk factors were included in the study. The 57-70 days (83.5%) and 71-84 days (83.4%) group had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days (75.8%) and < 42 days (68.3%) group. As for different screening strategies, the pass rate of OAE(otoacoustic emissions), AABR (auto auditory brainstem response) and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group, respectively. The OAE + AABR had the lowest pass rate compared to the other two modalities. When the pass rate was compared as different risk factors, the 57-70 days and 71-84 days group also had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days and < 42 days group and the pass rate had no significant differences among various risk factors group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that all the pass rate of OAE, AABR and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group with significant difference, suggesting that the delayed screening time (>57 days) may increase the re-screening pass rate and reduce anxiety of parents, which is of great significance for clinical work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"257-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/13/WJO2-8-257.PMC9479479.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较分析高危因素新生儿听力再筛查的通过率和筛查策略:方法:对广州市妇女儿童医疗中心2011年6月至2018年6月期间未通过新生儿听力初筛并随后进行听力复筛的高危新生儿进行回顾性病历回顾:研究共纳入868名具有高危因素的新生儿。与 42-56 天组(75.8%)和小于 42 天组(68.3%)相比,57-70 天组(83.5%)和 71-84 天组(83.4%)通过率最高。在不同的筛查策略中,57-70 天组和 71-84 天组的 OAE(耳声发射)、AABR(自动听性脑干反应)和 OAE + AABR 的合格率分别最高。与其他两种方式相比,OAE + AABR 的通过率最低。将合格率与不同的风险因素进行比较,57-70 天组和 71-84 天组的合格率也高于 42-56 天组和小于 42 天组,而不同风险因素组的合格率无显著差异:我们的研究结果表明,所有 OAE、AABR 和 OAE + AABR 的合格率均以 57-70 天组和 71-84 天组最高,且差异显著,这表明延迟筛查时间(>57 天)可提高复筛合格率并减少家长的焦虑,这对临床工作具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening strategy and time points for newborn hearing re-screening with high risk factors.

Objective: To compare and analyze the pass rate and screening strategy of hearing rescreening for newborns with high risk factors.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of high-risk newborns who failed their initial newborn hearing screen and subsequently underwent secondary hearing tests from June 2011 to June 2018 in Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center were performed.

Results: Eight hundred and sixty-eight newborns with high risk factors were included in the study. The 57-70 days (83.5%) and 71-84 days (83.4%) group had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days (75.8%) and < 42 days (68.3%) group. As for different screening strategies, the pass rate of OAE(otoacoustic emissions), AABR (auto auditory brainstem response) and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group, respectively. The OAE + AABR had the lowest pass rate compared to the other two modalities. When the pass rate was compared as different risk factors, the 57-70 days and 71-84 days group also had the highest pass rate compared with 42-56 days and < 42 days group and the pass rate had no significant differences among various risk factors group.

Conclusion: Our results showed that all the pass rate of OAE, AABR and OAE + AABR was the highest in 57-70 days group and 71-84 days group with significant difference, suggesting that the delayed screening time (>57 days) may increase the re-screening pass rate and reduce anxiety of parents, which is of great significance for clinical work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Guidelines. Author Guidelines. Long COVID: From olfactory dysfunctions to viral Parkinsonism. Author Guidelines. Epidemiological and histopathological characteristics of thyroid carcinoma in a Tunisian health care center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1