风险识别和分析在医疗设备的初创企业发展:迈向更广泛的风险管理框架。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S375977
Omar Kheir, Alexis Jacoby, Stijn Verwulgen
{"title":"风险识别和分析在医疗设备的初创企业发展:迈向更广泛的风险管理框架。","authors":"Omar Kheir,&nbsp;Alexis Jacoby,&nbsp;Stijn Verwulgen","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S375977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices' development should be tackled, especially with regard to the type of risks that should be addressed. Risk management in the medical devices' development field is currently focused on technical risks, comprising product, usability, and development process risks, in alignment with standards' requirements and regulations, without giving enough attention to non-technical risks, which include business and project risks. Start-ups within this heavily regulated domain have a key role in the innovation process, yet they suffer a structural lack of tangible, such as financial capacity, and intangible resources such as development, risk management, and regulations' compliance. Nonetheless, they can still optimize their risk identification coverage beyond the enforced requirements to increase their products' chances of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A set of qualitative interviews, serving the adopted grounded theory building research method, with seven start-ups who are involved in the development, commercialization, and quality control of medical devices was accomplished. The purpose was to determine the applied risk management practices and most importantly identify the risk types covered by them. Since every start-up is a project by itself, a sample of project risks, as identified by the project management institute, was utilized to scope the risk coverage and flag missing non-technical risks by the participating start-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Un-identified risk types, lack of involvement of the right teams, and other related loopholes were presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A list of requirements was developed and sketched in a user-friendly risk management framework, which is believed to be crucial in helping start-ups attain successful, safe, and regulatory compliant medical devices production, is shared in the discussion and proposed framework section of this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":" ","pages":"349-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/3b/mder-15-349.PMC9507292.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Kheir,&nbsp;Alexis Jacoby,&nbsp;Stijn Verwulgen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S375977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices' development should be tackled, especially with regard to the type of risks that should be addressed. Risk management in the medical devices' development field is currently focused on technical risks, comprising product, usability, and development process risks, in alignment with standards' requirements and regulations, without giving enough attention to non-technical risks, which include business and project risks. Start-ups within this heavily regulated domain have a key role in the innovation process, yet they suffer a structural lack of tangible, such as financial capacity, and intangible resources such as development, risk management, and regulations' compliance. Nonetheless, they can still optimize their risk identification coverage beyond the enforced requirements to increase their products' chances of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A set of qualitative interviews, serving the adopted grounded theory building research method, with seven start-ups who are involved in the development, commercialization, and quality control of medical devices was accomplished. The purpose was to determine the applied risk management practices and most importantly identify the risk types covered by them. Since every start-up is a project by itself, a sample of project risks, as identified by the project management institute, was utilized to scope the risk coverage and flag missing non-technical risks by the participating start-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Un-identified risk types, lack of involvement of the right teams, and other related loopholes were presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A list of requirements was developed and sketched in a user-friendly risk management framework, which is believed to be crucial in helping start-ups attain successful, safe, and regulatory compliant medical devices production, is shared in the discussion and proposed framework section of this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"349-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/3b/mder-15-349.PMC9507292.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S375977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S375977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导论:虽然风险管理已经成为医疗器械发展的基础,由法规和国际标准强制执行,但仍然没有一个全面的模型来解释医疗器械发展中的风险管理应该如何解决,特别是关于应该解决的风险类型。医疗器械开发领域的风险管理目前主要集中在技术风险上,包括产品、可用性和开发过程风险,与标准要求和法规保持一致,而对非技术风险(包括业务和项目风险)没有给予足够的重视。在这个受到严格监管的领域,初创企业在创新过程中发挥着关键作用,但它们在结构性上缺乏有形资源(如财务能力)和无形资源(如开发、风险管理和法规遵从性)。尽管如此,他们仍然可以优化超出强制要求的风险识别覆盖范围,以增加产品成功的机会。方法:采用扎根理论构建研究方法,对7家从事医疗器械研发、商业化和质量控制的初创企业进行定性访谈。目的是确定应用的风险管理实践,最重要的是确定它们所涵盖的风险类型。由于每个初创企业本身就是一个项目,项目管理机构确定的项目风险样本被用来确定风险覆盖范围,并标记参与的初创企业遗漏的非技术风险。结果:存在未识别的风险类型、缺乏合适团队的参与以及其他相关漏洞。讨论:在用户友好的风险管理框架中制定并概述了一系列要求,这被认为是帮助初创企业实现成功、安全和符合法规的医疗设备生产的关键,并在本文的讨论和建议框架部分分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Identification and Analysis in the Development of Medical Devices Among Start-Ups: Towards a Broader Risk Management Framework.

Introduction: Whilst risk management has become fundamental in the development of medical devices, enforced by regulations and international standards, there is still no comprehensive model that explains how risk management in medical devices' development should be tackled, especially with regard to the type of risks that should be addressed. Risk management in the medical devices' development field is currently focused on technical risks, comprising product, usability, and development process risks, in alignment with standards' requirements and regulations, without giving enough attention to non-technical risks, which include business and project risks. Start-ups within this heavily regulated domain have a key role in the innovation process, yet they suffer a structural lack of tangible, such as financial capacity, and intangible resources such as development, risk management, and regulations' compliance. Nonetheless, they can still optimize their risk identification coverage beyond the enforced requirements to increase their products' chances of success.

Methods: A set of qualitative interviews, serving the adopted grounded theory building research method, with seven start-ups who are involved in the development, commercialization, and quality control of medical devices was accomplished. The purpose was to determine the applied risk management practices and most importantly identify the risk types covered by them. Since every start-up is a project by itself, a sample of project risks, as identified by the project management institute, was utilized to scope the risk coverage and flag missing non-technical risks by the participating start-ups.

Results: Un-identified risk types, lack of involvement of the right teams, and other related loopholes were presented.

Discussion: A list of requirements was developed and sketched in a user-friendly risk management framework, which is believed to be crucial in helping start-ups attain successful, safe, and regulatory compliant medical devices production, is shared in the discussion and proposed framework section of this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-Invasive Laser Surgery With Deep Operating Depth Using Multibeam Interference. Feasibility and Usability of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pediatric Neuroimaging in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Study. Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Airway with Endoscopic Respiratory Mask for Hypoxemia in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Obese Outpatients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Outcome of Pleural Empyema Treated With Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Patients With Severe Co-Morbidities: An Observational Study. New Bipolar Electrosurgical Vessel Sealing Device Provides Improved Performance and Procedural Efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1