Fotios Barkas, Petros Adamidis, Amalia-Despoina Koutsogianni, George Liamis, Evangelos Liberopoulos
{"title":"参加血脂门诊的患者的他汀类药物相关副作用:来自6年研究的证据","authors":"Fotios Barkas, Petros Adamidis, Amalia-Despoina Koutsogianni, George Liamis, Evangelos Liberopoulos","doi":"10.5114/amsad.2021.111313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding the actual incidence of statin-associated side effects in clinical practice. We aimed to record the incidence of statin-associated side effects in the setting of a lipid clinic. We focused on clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study including adult patients with dyslipidemia followed up for ≥ 3 years in a university hospital lipid clinic in Greece. We recorded the incidence of clinically relevant liver enzyme increase (> 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) on 2 occasions) and SAMS (muscle crumps, creatine kinase (CK) increase > 10 × ULN and rhabdomyolysis) during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among study participants (<i>n</i> = 1,334), 3.1% and 2.8% presented with clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and SAMS at least once during a median follow-up of 6 years (4-10). Only 11% (<i>n</i> = 5) of subjects with a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and 6% (<i>n</i> = 2) of those with SAMS did not tolerate any statin at any dose. Most subjects with a history of a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase or SAMS were eventually treated with a moderate- or high-intensity statin (76% and 80%, respectively) or with combination treatment of a statin plus another lipid-lowering drug (15% and 36%, respectively). No risk factors for these statin-associated side effects were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of statin-associated side effects is low in the setting of a lipid clinic. The vast majority of these individuals were still able to tolerate statin treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8317,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/3e/AMS-AD-6-142830.PMC9487797.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statin-associated side effects in patients attending a lipid clinic: evidence from a 6-year study.\",\"authors\":\"Fotios Barkas, Petros Adamidis, Amalia-Despoina Koutsogianni, George Liamis, Evangelos Liberopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsad.2021.111313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding the actual incidence of statin-associated side effects in clinical practice. We aimed to record the incidence of statin-associated side effects in the setting of a lipid clinic. We focused on clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study including adult patients with dyslipidemia followed up for ≥ 3 years in a university hospital lipid clinic in Greece. We recorded the incidence of clinically relevant liver enzyme increase (> 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) on 2 occasions) and SAMS (muscle crumps, creatine kinase (CK) increase > 10 × ULN and rhabdomyolysis) during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among study participants (<i>n</i> = 1,334), 3.1% and 2.8% presented with clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and SAMS at least once during a median follow-up of 6 years (4-10). Only 11% (<i>n</i> = 5) of subjects with a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and 6% (<i>n</i> = 2) of those with SAMS did not tolerate any statin at any dose. Most subjects with a history of a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase or SAMS were eventually treated with a moderate- or high-intensity statin (76% and 80%, respectively) or with combination treatment of a statin plus another lipid-lowering drug (15% and 36%, respectively). No risk factors for these statin-associated side effects were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of statin-associated side effects is low in the setting of a lipid clinic. The vast majority of these individuals were still able to tolerate statin treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/3e/AMS-AD-6-142830.PMC9487797.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2021.111313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2021.111313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Statin-associated side effects in patients attending a lipid clinic: evidence from a 6-year study.
Introduction: There is conflicting evidence regarding the actual incidence of statin-associated side effects in clinical practice. We aimed to record the incidence of statin-associated side effects in the setting of a lipid clinic. We focused on clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS).
Material and methods: This was a retrospective study including adult patients with dyslipidemia followed up for ≥ 3 years in a university hospital lipid clinic in Greece. We recorded the incidence of clinically relevant liver enzyme increase (> 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) on 2 occasions) and SAMS (muscle crumps, creatine kinase (CK) increase > 10 × ULN and rhabdomyolysis) during follow-up.
Results: Among study participants (n = 1,334), 3.1% and 2.8% presented with clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and SAMS at least once during a median follow-up of 6 years (4-10). Only 11% (n = 5) of subjects with a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase and 6% (n = 2) of those with SAMS did not tolerate any statin at any dose. Most subjects with a history of a clinically relevant liver enzyme increase or SAMS were eventually treated with a moderate- or high-intensity statin (76% and 80%, respectively) or with combination treatment of a statin plus another lipid-lowering drug (15% and 36%, respectively). No risk factors for these statin-associated side effects were identified.
Conclusions: The incidence of statin-associated side effects is low in the setting of a lipid clinic. The vast majority of these individuals were still able to tolerate statin treatment.