{"title":"TNFα抑制剂的治疗药物监测:新技术和分析的焦点。","authors":"Dario Cattaneo, Jessica Cusato","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"18 10","pages":"615-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic drug monitoring of TNFα inhibitors: a spotlight on novel techniques and assays.\",\"authors\":\"Dario Cattaneo, Jessica Cusato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay\",\"PeriodicalId\":12250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"615-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapeutic drug monitoring of TNFα inhibitors: a spotlight on novel techniques and assays.
Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development.
The Editors welcome:
Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data.
Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.