TNFα抑制剂的治疗药物监测:新技术和分析的焦点。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775
Dario Cattaneo, Jessica Cusato
{"title":"TNFα抑制剂的治疗药物监测:新技术和分析的焦点。","authors":"Dario Cattaneo,&nbsp;Jessica Cusato","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay","PeriodicalId":12250,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","volume":"18 10","pages":"615-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic drug monitoring of TNFα inhibitors: a spotlight on novel techniques and assays.\",\"authors\":\"Dario Cattaneo,&nbsp;Jessica Cusato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay\",\"PeriodicalId\":12250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"615-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2022.2134775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic drug monitoring of TNFα inhibitors: a spotlight on novel techniques and assays.
Among the wide armamentarium of currently available biological inhibitors, those targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) – etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab – have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [1]. The individual molecules of this class may differ in terms of route of drug administration (endovenous versus subcutaneous), structure (i.e. infliximab is a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody, adalimumab a fully human monoclonal antibody, and etanercept a construct comprising two human p75 TNFα receptors coupled to the Fc portion of a monoclonal human antibody), immunogenicity, as well as potential efficacy (reviewed in [1–3]). Although TNFα inhibitors are efficacious, the response to therapy is highly variable among individuals, with a time-dependent loss of response ranging from <10% up to 80% [1–3]. The loss of response to TNFα therapy is partly attributable to suboptimal drug exposure, which in turn may be caused by the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) directed against the biologically active sites (neutralizing antibodies) or bound to other parts of the molecule (non-neutralizing antibodies). Significant associations have been reported between systemic concentrations of TNFα inhibitors and clinical/endoscopic outcomes in patients with IBD, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has indeed been proposed as a diagnostic tool to improve the response to TNFα inhibitors in these clinical settings [2–8]. However, validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of these biological inhibitors are mandatory in order to make the TDM clinically useful. The most common techniques used for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors are the homogeneous mobility shift assay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, and the rapid testing with lateral flow techniques (i.e. RIDA® Quick, Quantum Blue®, etc.) [4–8]. Certainly, the field is undergoing considerable evolution (Figure 1), and many technologies are under development. This editorial focuses on some new technologies for the TDM of TNFα inhibitors, without claiming to be exhaustive on the topic. 2. N Latex aTNFα assay
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology (ISSN 1742-5255 [print], 1744-7607 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of ADME-Tox. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering metabolic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological issues relating to specific drugs, drug-drug interactions, drug classes or their use in specific populations; issues relating to enzymes involved in the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs; techniques involved in the study of drug metabolism and toxicology; novel technologies for obtaining ADME-Tox data. Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical, toxicological and pharmacokinetic data on a particular drug. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacologists, clinical toxicologists and related professionals.
期刊最新文献
A critical need for ‘gut neutrality’: mitigating adverse drug-microbiome interactions Drug interactions in cardiology: focus on statins and their combination with other lipid-lowering drugs Assessing the therapeutic and toxicological profile of novel GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes Clinical pharmacokinetics of glipizide: a systematic review Intraocular drugs: pharmacokinetic strategies and the influence on efficacy and durability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1