使用弱标记肺部 CT 扫描的医疗决策支持系统。

Frontiers in Medical Technology Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2022.980735
Alejandro Murillo-González, David González, Laura Jaramillo, Carlos Galeano, Fabby Tavera, Marcia Mejía, Alejandro Hernández, David Restrepo Rivera, J G Paniagua, Leandro Ariza-Jiménez, José Julián Garcés Echeverri, Christian Andrés Diaz León, Diana Lucia Serna-Higuita, Wayner Barrios, Wiston Arrázola, Miguel Ángel Mejía, Sebastián Arango, Daniela Marín Ramírez, Emmanuel Salinas-Miranda, O L Quintero
{"title":"使用弱标记肺部 CT 扫描的医疗决策支持系统。","authors":"Alejandro Murillo-González, David González, Laura Jaramillo, Carlos Galeano, Fabby Tavera, Marcia Mejía, Alejandro Hernández, David Restrepo Rivera, J G Paniagua, Leandro Ariza-Jiménez, José Julián Garcés Echeverri, Christian Andrés Diaz León, Diana Lucia Serna-Higuita, Wayner Barrios, Wiston Arrázola, Miguel Ángel Mejía, Sebastián Arango, Daniela Marín Ramírez, Emmanuel Salinas-Miranda, O L Quintero","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.980735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determination and development of an effective set of models leveraging Artificial Intelligence techniques to generate a system able to support clinical practitioners working with COVID-19 patients. It involves a pipeline including classification, lung and lesion segmentation, as well as lesion quantification of axial lung CT studies.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A deep neural network architecture based on DenseNet is introduced for the classification of weakly-labeled, variable-sized (and possibly sparse) axial lung CT scans. The models are trained and tested on aggregated, publicly available data sets with over 10 categories. To further assess the models, a data set was collected from multiple medical institutions in Colombia, which includes healthy, COVID-19 and patients with other diseases. It is composed of 1,322 CT studies from a diverse set of CT machines and institutions that make over 550,000 slices. Each CT study was labeled based on a clinical test, and no per-slice annotation took place. This enabled a classification into Normal vs. Abnormal patients, and for those that were considered abnormal, an extra classification step into Abnormal (other diseases) vs. COVID-19. Additionally, the pipeline features a methodology to segment and quantify lesions of COVID-19 patients on the complete CT study, enabling easier localization and progress tracking. Moreover, multiple ablation studies were performed to appropriately assess the elements composing the classification pipeline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing lung CT study classification models achieved 0.83 accuracy, 0.79 sensitivity, 0.87 specificity, 0.82 F1 score and 0.85 precision for the Normal vs. Abnormal task. For the Abnormal vs COVID-19 task, the model obtained 0.86 accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, 0.91 specificity, 0.84 F1 score and 0.88 precision. The ablation studies showed that using the complete CT study in the pipeline resulted in greater classification performance, restating that relevant COVID-19 patterns cannot be ignored towards the top and bottom of the lung volume.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The lung CT classification architecture introduced has shown that it can handle weakly-labeled, variable-sized and possibly sparse axial lung studies, reducing the need for expert annotations at a per-slice level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work presents a working methodology that can guide the development of decision support systems for clinical reasoning in future interventionist or prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":" ","pages":"980735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical decision support system using weakly-labeled lung CT scans.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Murillo-González, David González, Laura Jaramillo, Carlos Galeano, Fabby Tavera, Marcia Mejía, Alejandro Hernández, David Restrepo Rivera, J G Paniagua, Leandro Ariza-Jiménez, José Julián Garcés Echeverri, Christian Andrés Diaz León, Diana Lucia Serna-Higuita, Wayner Barrios, Wiston Arrázola, Miguel Ángel Mejía, Sebastián Arango, Daniela Marín Ramírez, Emmanuel Salinas-Miranda, O L Quintero\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2022.980735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determination and development of an effective set of models leveraging Artificial Intelligence techniques to generate a system able to support clinical practitioners working with COVID-19 patients. It involves a pipeline including classification, lung and lesion segmentation, as well as lesion quantification of axial lung CT studies.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A deep neural network architecture based on DenseNet is introduced for the classification of weakly-labeled, variable-sized (and possibly sparse) axial lung CT scans. The models are trained and tested on aggregated, publicly available data sets with over 10 categories. To further assess the models, a data set was collected from multiple medical institutions in Colombia, which includes healthy, COVID-19 and patients with other diseases. It is composed of 1,322 CT studies from a diverse set of CT machines and institutions that make over 550,000 slices. Each CT study was labeled based on a clinical test, and no per-slice annotation took place. This enabled a classification into Normal vs. Abnormal patients, and for those that were considered abnormal, an extra classification step into Abnormal (other diseases) vs. COVID-19. Additionally, the pipeline features a methodology to segment and quantify lesions of COVID-19 patients on the complete CT study, enabling easier localization and progress tracking. Moreover, multiple ablation studies were performed to appropriately assess the elements composing the classification pipeline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performing lung CT study classification models achieved 0.83 accuracy, 0.79 sensitivity, 0.87 specificity, 0.82 F1 score and 0.85 precision for the Normal vs. Abnormal task. For the Abnormal vs COVID-19 task, the model obtained 0.86 accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, 0.91 specificity, 0.84 F1 score and 0.88 precision. The ablation studies showed that using the complete CT study in the pipeline resulted in greater classification performance, restating that relevant COVID-19 patterns cannot be ignored towards the top and bottom of the lung volume.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The lung CT classification architecture introduced has shown that it can handle weakly-labeled, variable-sized and possibly sparse axial lung studies, reducing the need for expert annotations at a per-slice level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work presents a working methodology that can guide the development of decision support systems for clinical reasoning in future interventionist or prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"980735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.980735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.980735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用人工智能技术确定和开发一套有效的模型,以生成一个能够支持临床从业人员处理 COVID-19 患者的系统。这涉及到一个包括分类、肺部和病灶分割以及轴向肺部 CT 研究病灶量化的管道:方法:介绍一种基于 DenseNet 的深度神经网络架构,用于对弱标记、大小可变(可能稀疏)的轴向肺部 CT 扫描进行分类。模型在包含 10 多个类别的公开数据集上进行了训练和测试。为了进一步评估模型,我们从哥伦比亚多家医疗机构收集了一个数据集,其中包括健康人、COVID-19 和其他疾病患者。该数据集由来自不同CT机和机构的1,322项CT研究组成,共制作了超过550,000张切片。每项 CT 研究都根据临床测试进行了标注,没有进行每张切片标注。这样就能对正常与异常患者进行分类,对于那些被认为异常的患者,还能对异常(其他疾病)与 COVID-19 进行额外的分类。此外,该流水线还采用了一种方法,在完整的 CT 研究中对 COVID-19 患者的病灶进行分割和量化,使定位和进展跟踪更加容易。此外,还进行了多项消融研究,以适当评估构成分类管道的要素:结果:表现最好的肺部 CT 研究分类模型在正常 vs. 异常任务中达到了 0.83 的准确率、0.79 的灵敏度、0.87 的特异性、0.82 的 F1 分数和 0.85 的精确度。在异常与 COVID-19 任务中,模型获得了 0.86 的准确度、0.81 的灵敏度、0.91 的特异性、0.84 的 F1 分数和 0.88 的精确度。消融研究表明,在管道中使用完整的 CT 研究结果可提高分类性能,这再次说明,不能忽略肺容积顶部和底部的相关 COVID-19 模式:讨论:所介绍的肺部 CT 分类架构表明,它可以处理弱标记、大小可变和可能稀疏的轴向肺部研究,从而减少了专家在每个切片级别上进行注释的需要:这项工作提出了一种工作方法,可指导决策支持系统的开发,用于未来干预或前瞻性研究中的临床推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical decision support system using weakly-labeled lung CT scans.

Purpose: Determination and development of an effective set of models leveraging Artificial Intelligence techniques to generate a system able to support clinical practitioners working with COVID-19 patients. It involves a pipeline including classification, lung and lesion segmentation, as well as lesion quantification of axial lung CT studies.

Approach: A deep neural network architecture based on DenseNet is introduced for the classification of weakly-labeled, variable-sized (and possibly sparse) axial lung CT scans. The models are trained and tested on aggregated, publicly available data sets with over 10 categories. To further assess the models, a data set was collected from multiple medical institutions in Colombia, which includes healthy, COVID-19 and patients with other diseases. It is composed of 1,322 CT studies from a diverse set of CT machines and institutions that make over 550,000 slices. Each CT study was labeled based on a clinical test, and no per-slice annotation took place. This enabled a classification into Normal vs. Abnormal patients, and for those that were considered abnormal, an extra classification step into Abnormal (other diseases) vs. COVID-19. Additionally, the pipeline features a methodology to segment and quantify lesions of COVID-19 patients on the complete CT study, enabling easier localization and progress tracking. Moreover, multiple ablation studies were performed to appropriately assess the elements composing the classification pipeline.

Results: The best performing lung CT study classification models achieved 0.83 accuracy, 0.79 sensitivity, 0.87 specificity, 0.82 F1 score and 0.85 precision for the Normal vs. Abnormal task. For the Abnormal vs COVID-19 task, the model obtained 0.86 accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, 0.91 specificity, 0.84 F1 score and 0.88 precision. The ablation studies showed that using the complete CT study in the pipeline resulted in greater classification performance, restating that relevant COVID-19 patterns cannot be ignored towards the top and bottom of the lung volume.

Discussion: The lung CT classification architecture introduced has shown that it can handle weakly-labeled, variable-sized and possibly sparse axial lung studies, reducing the need for expert annotations at a per-slice level.

Conclusions: This work presents a working methodology that can guide the development of decision support systems for clinical reasoning in future interventionist or prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: The effect of automated manual lymphatic drainage therapy on lymphatic contractility in 4 distinct cases Detection of natural autoimmunity to ghrelin in diabetes mellitus Ensuring safety and efficacy in combination products: regulatory challenges and best practices Augmented reality-based software (Echo-QR) for guiding the echographic probe toward the acoustic window: a pilot study Ethical considerations in the regulation and use of herbal medicines in the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1