外周神经刺激器和地标技术联合斜角肌间阻滞和颈浅丛阻滞作为新冠肺炎大流行锁骨手术单一麻醉效果的前瞻性观察研究

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-09 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_80_22
Uma Majumdar, Anuradha Mitra
{"title":"外周神经刺激器和地标技术联合斜角肌间阻滞和颈浅丛阻滞作为新冠肺炎大流行锁骨手术单一麻醉效果的前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Uma Majumdar,&nbsp;Anuradha Mitra","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_80_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures of the clavicle are usually operated under general anesthesia (GA) as they need dense anesthesia, and the airway is difficult to access intraoperatively. There is no established regional anesthesia (RA) technique for clavicular fractures, also as the innervation is contentious. Some studies have been done using RA techniques, but they are all small case numbers. RA is superior to GA in many ways, and we wished to avoid GA specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to use a peripheral nerve stimulator and a landmark-based technique to give interscalene block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as a sole anesthetic for clavicular fracture surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval from our ethics committee and informed consent, thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II, aged 18-65 years, after exclusion criteria were selected who had to undergo clavicular surgery. Three 10-mL syringes were made, each with 5 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, 2 mL of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, and 3 mL of saline. Using the HNS Stimuplex (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) nerve stimulator, 20 mL was given for an ISB and 5 mL for the SCPB. RA was considered successful if there was no conversion to GA and surgery could be performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With an onset time of 6.53 ± 2.17 min, good operating conditions were obtained in all our patients. Horner's syndrome was noted in two patients. Surgery was successfully carried out in all thirty patients under RA. Pain relief lasted postoperatively for 5 ± 0.92 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ISB combined with SCPB is safe and effective as a sole anesthetic for clavicular surgery. We successfully avoided the use of a general anesthetic in these patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and gave them a safe and effective alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"149-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558677/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Observational Study of the Efficacy of Combined Interscalene Block and Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using Peripheral Nerve Stimulator and Landmark-Based Technique, as a Sole Anesthetic for Surgeries on the Clavicle in the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Uma Majumdar,&nbsp;Anuradha Mitra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_80_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fractures of the clavicle are usually operated under general anesthesia (GA) as they need dense anesthesia, and the airway is difficult to access intraoperatively. There is no established regional anesthesia (RA) technique for clavicular fractures, also as the innervation is contentious. Some studies have been done using RA techniques, but they are all small case numbers. RA is superior to GA in many ways, and we wished to avoid GA specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to use a peripheral nerve stimulator and a landmark-based technique to give interscalene block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as a sole anesthetic for clavicular fracture surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval from our ethics committee and informed consent, thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II, aged 18-65 years, after exclusion criteria were selected who had to undergo clavicular surgery. Three 10-mL syringes were made, each with 5 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, 2 mL of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, and 3 mL of saline. Using the HNS Stimuplex (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) nerve stimulator, 20 mL was given for an ISB and 5 mL for the SCPB. RA was considered successful if there was no conversion to GA and surgery could be performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With an onset time of 6.53 ± 2.17 min, good operating conditions were obtained in all our patients. Horner's syndrome was noted in two patients. Surgery was successfully carried out in all thirty patients under RA. Pain relief lasted postoperatively for 5 ± 0.92 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ISB combined with SCPB is safe and effective as a sole anesthetic for clavicular surgery. We successfully avoided the use of a general anesthetic in these patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and gave them a safe and effective alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"149-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_80_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_80_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:锁骨骨折手术通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,因为它需要密集的麻醉,术中气道难以进入。由于锁骨骨折的神经支配存在争议,目前尚无区域麻醉(RA)技术。一些使用RA技术的研究已经完成,但它们都是小病例。RA在许多方面优于GA,我们希望在COVID-19大流行期间特别避免GA。目的:本研究旨在使用外周神经刺激器和基于里程碑的技术,在COVID-19大流行期间将斜角肌间阻滞(ISB)和颈浅丛阻滞(SCPB)作为锁骨骨折手术的唯一麻醉。背景和设计:这是一项在印度东部一家三级护理教学医院进行的前瞻性观察研究。材料和方法:经伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,选择符合排除标准的美国麻醉医师学会I级或II级患者30例,年龄18-65岁,行锁骨手术。配制3支10ml注射器,每支注射器分别装0.75%罗哌卡因5ml、2%利多卡因2ml(1:20万肾上腺素)和生理盐水3ml。使用HNS Stimuplex (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany)神经刺激器,ISB给予20 mL, SCPB给予5 mL。如果没有转化为GA,可以进行手术,则认为RA是成功的。结果:起病时间为6.53±2.17 min,手术条件良好。两名患者出现了霍纳氏综合征。所有30例RA患者均成功进行手术。结论:ISB联合SCPB作为锁骨手术单一麻醉是安全有效的。在COVID-19大流行期间,我们成功地避免了对这些患者使用全身麻醉剂,并为他们提供了一种安全有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective Observational Study of the Efficacy of Combined Interscalene Block and Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using Peripheral Nerve Stimulator and Landmark-Based Technique, as a Sole Anesthetic for Surgeries on the Clavicle in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Fractures of the clavicle are usually operated under general anesthesia (GA) as they need dense anesthesia, and the airway is difficult to access intraoperatively. There is no established regional anesthesia (RA) technique for clavicular fractures, also as the innervation is contentious. Some studies have been done using RA techniques, but they are all small case numbers. RA is superior to GA in many ways, and we wished to avoid GA specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aims: This study aimed to use a peripheral nerve stimulator and a landmark-based technique to give interscalene block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as a sole anesthetic for clavicular fracture surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Settings and design: This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India.

Materials and methods: After approval from our ethics committee and informed consent, thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II, aged 18-65 years, after exclusion criteria were selected who had to undergo clavicular surgery. Three 10-mL syringes were made, each with 5 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, 2 mL of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, and 3 mL of saline. Using the HNS Stimuplex (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) nerve stimulator, 20 mL was given for an ISB and 5 mL for the SCPB. RA was considered successful if there was no conversion to GA and surgery could be performed.

Results: With an onset time of 6.53 ± 2.17 min, good operating conditions were obtained in all our patients. Horner's syndrome was noted in two patients. Surgery was successfully carried out in all thirty patients under RA. Pain relief lasted postoperatively for 5 ± 0.92 h.

Conclusion: ISB combined with SCPB is safe and effective as a sole anesthetic for clavicular surgery. We successfully avoided the use of a general anesthetic in these patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and gave them a safe and effective alternative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1