2008年至2021年,动物食品中单核细胞增生李斯特菌对治疗李斯特菌病的一线和二线药物的耐药性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology Pub Date : 2022-10-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1351983
Jaqueline Oliveira Dos Reis, Bruno Serpa Vieira, Adelino Cunha Neto, Vinicius Silva Castro, Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo
{"title":"2008年至2021年,动物食品中单核细胞增生李斯特菌对治疗李斯特菌病的一线和二线药物的耐药性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Jaqueline Oliveira Dos Reis,&nbsp;Bruno Serpa Vieira,&nbsp;Adelino Cunha Neto,&nbsp;Vinicius Silva Castro,&nbsp;Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo","doi":"10.1155/2022/1351983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First-line drugs for the treatment of listeriosis are the same around the world, but particular conditions might reduce their efficacy, including antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to verify, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, whether the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> from animal foods is higher for first- or second-line antimicrobials. From the total of 302 identified studies, 16 met all the eligibility criteria from 2008 to 2021 and were included in this meta-analysis. They comprised a dataset of 1152 <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates, obtained from different animal food products, food processing environment, and live animals. The included studies were developed in South America (<i>n</i> = 5), Europe (<i>n</i> = 4), Asia (<i>n</i> = 3), Africa (<i>n</i> = 2), and North America (<i>n</i> = 2), testing a total of 35 different antimicrobials, 11 of them classified as first-line drugs. Complete lack of antimicrobial resistance across the studies (all <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates tested as susceptible) was only observed for linezolid, while widespread antimicrobial resistance (all <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates tested resistant) was described for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefoxitin, fusidic acid, imipenem, sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Overall, the meta-analysis results indicated no evidence that antimicrobial resistance in <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolated from animal-based food is higher for first-line antimicrobials compared to second-line compounds (<i>p</i>=0.37). A greater volume of publication, together with better characterization of the isolates, is still needed for a more precise estimate of the real prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in <i>L. monocytogenes</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568363/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> from Animal Foods to First- and Second-Line Drugs in the Treatment of Listeriosis from 2008 to 2021: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jaqueline Oliveira Dos Reis,&nbsp;Bruno Serpa Vieira,&nbsp;Adelino Cunha Neto,&nbsp;Vinicius Silva Castro,&nbsp;Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1351983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>First-line drugs for the treatment of listeriosis are the same around the world, but particular conditions might reduce their efficacy, including antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to verify, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, whether the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> from animal foods is higher for first- or second-line antimicrobials. From the total of 302 identified studies, 16 met all the eligibility criteria from 2008 to 2021 and were included in this meta-analysis. They comprised a dataset of 1152 <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates, obtained from different animal food products, food processing environment, and live animals. The included studies were developed in South America (<i>n</i> = 5), Europe (<i>n</i> = 4), Asia (<i>n</i> = 3), Africa (<i>n</i> = 2), and North America (<i>n</i> = 2), testing a total of 35 different antimicrobials, 11 of them classified as first-line drugs. Complete lack of antimicrobial resistance across the studies (all <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates tested as susceptible) was only observed for linezolid, while widespread antimicrobial resistance (all <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolates tested resistant) was described for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefoxitin, fusidic acid, imipenem, sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Overall, the meta-analysis results indicated no evidence that antimicrobial resistance in <i>L. monocytogenes</i> isolated from animal-based food is higher for first-line antimicrobials compared to second-line compounds (<i>p</i>=0.37). A greater volume of publication, together with better characterization of the isolates, is still needed for a more precise estimate of the real prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in <i>L. monocytogenes</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1351983\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1351983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

治疗李斯特菌病的一线药物在世界各地都是相同的,但特殊情况可能会降低其疗效,包括抗菌素耐药性。因此,本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,验证来自动物性食品的单核细胞增生李斯特菌对一线或二线抗菌素的耐药性是否更高。从总共302项确定的研究中,有16项符合2008年至2021年的所有资格标准,并纳入本荟萃分析。他们的数据集包括1152株单核增生乳杆菌,从不同的动物食品、食品加工环境和活体动物中获得。纳入的研究分别在南美(n = 5)、欧洲(n = 4)、亚洲(n = 3)、非洲(n = 2)和北美(n = 2)开展,共测试了35种不同的抗菌素,其中11种被列为一线药物。在所有研究中(所有单核增生乳杆菌分离株检测为敏感)仅观察到对利奈唑胺完全缺乏抗菌素耐药性,而广泛的抗菌素耐药性(所有单核增生乳杆菌分离株检测为耐药)被描述为阿莫西林、青霉素、头孢西丁、福西地酸、亚胺培南、磺胺甲恶唑和万古霉素。总体而言,meta分析结果显示,没有证据表明从动物性食品中分离的单核增生乳杆菌对一线抗菌素的耐药性高于二线化合物(p=0.37)。为了更精确地估计单核增生乳杆菌中抗菌素耐药性的真实流行情况,仍然需要更多的出版物,以及更好地描述分离株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes from Animal Foods to First- and Second-Line Drugs in the Treatment of Listeriosis from 2008 to 2021: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

First-line drugs for the treatment of listeriosis are the same around the world, but particular conditions might reduce their efficacy, including antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to verify, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, whether the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Listeria monocytogenes from animal foods is higher for first- or second-line antimicrobials. From the total of 302 identified studies, 16 met all the eligibility criteria from 2008 to 2021 and were included in this meta-analysis. They comprised a dataset of 1152 L. monocytogenes isolates, obtained from different animal food products, food processing environment, and live animals. The included studies were developed in South America (n = 5), Europe (n = 4), Asia (n = 3), Africa (n = 2), and North America (n = 2), testing a total of 35 different antimicrobials, 11 of them classified as first-line drugs. Complete lack of antimicrobial resistance across the studies (all L. monocytogenes isolates tested as susceptible) was only observed for linezolid, while widespread antimicrobial resistance (all L. monocytogenes isolates tested resistant) was described for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, cefoxitin, fusidic acid, imipenem, sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Overall, the meta-analysis results indicated no evidence that antimicrobial resistance in L. monocytogenes isolated from animal-based food is higher for first-line antimicrobials compared to second-line compounds (p=0.37). A greater volume of publication, together with better characterization of the isolates, is still needed for a more precise estimate of the real prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in L. monocytogenes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Profile of Candida kefyr Isolated from Clinical Samples and Dairy Products. Characterization of Virulence Genotypes, Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, and Biofilm Synthesis in Salmonella spp Isolated from Foodborne Outbreaks. The Characteristic of Biofilm Formation in ESBL-Producing K. pneumoniae Isolates. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Hypervirulent and Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from ICU Respiratory Infections. Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales Infections in Chinese Elderly Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1