不同剂量丁丙诺啡联合布比卡因治疗术后镇痛的比较研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_39_22
Smitirupa Borkotoky, Daisy Karan, Swarna Banerjee, Prerna Biswal, Nupur Moda
{"title":"不同剂量丁丙诺啡联合布比卡因治疗术后镇痛的比较研究。","authors":"Smitirupa Borkotoky,&nbsp;Daisy Karan,&nbsp;Swarna Banerjee,&nbsp;Prerna Biswal,&nbsp;Nupur Moda","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longer duration of analgesia, ceiling effect on respiratory depression, and the antihyperalgesia property make buprenorphine a good adjuvant for managing moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of postoperative analgesia of three different doses of buprenorphine of 60, 100, and 150 μg given intrathecally along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This prospective observational study was carried out in the anesthesia department of a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 90 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups (30 each) receiving different doses of buprenorphine. In addition, all patients received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to find out the association between the categorical variables. The association of quantitative variables between the groups was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test while within the groups was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification were comparable among the three groups. Sensory block, motor block, and total duration of analgesia were significantly higher with higher doses of buprenorphine. The mean difference in the duration of analgesia was comparable in patients receiving 100 μg (720 min) and 150 μg (825 min) of buprenorphine. Bradycardia as a side effect was only in patients receiving 150 μg of buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk-benefit of different doses of buprenorphine suggests that 100 μg may be the ideal dose for a better quality of spinal block and maintaining hemodynamic stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Doses of Buprenorphine in Combination with Bupivacaine in the Management of Postoperative Analgesia: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Smitirupa Borkotoky,&nbsp;Daisy Karan,&nbsp;Swarna Banerjee,&nbsp;Prerna Biswal,&nbsp;Nupur Moda\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_39_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longer duration of analgesia, ceiling effect on respiratory depression, and the antihyperalgesia property make buprenorphine a good adjuvant for managing moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of postoperative analgesia of three different doses of buprenorphine of 60, 100, and 150 μg given intrathecally along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This prospective observational study was carried out in the anesthesia department of a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 90 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups (30 each) receiving different doses of buprenorphine. In addition, all patients received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to find out the association between the categorical variables. The association of quantitative variables between the groups was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test while within the groups was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification were comparable among the three groups. Sensory block, motor block, and total duration of analgesia were significantly higher with higher doses of buprenorphine. The mean difference in the duration of analgesia was comparable in patients receiving 100 μg (720 min) and 150 μg (825 min) of buprenorphine. Bradycardia as a side effect was only in patients receiving 150 μg of buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk-benefit of different doses of buprenorphine suggests that 100 μg may be the ideal dose for a better quality of spinal block and maintaining hemodynamic stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"121-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_39_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_39_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:丁丙诺啡具有较长的镇痛时间,对呼吸抑制的抑制作用,以及抗痛觉过敏的特性,使丁丙诺啡成为治疗中重度术后疼痛的良好辅助药物。目的:观察丁丙诺啡(60、100、150 μg)与高压布比卡因联合应用于下肢手术患者的术后镇痛效果及持续时间。背景和设计:本前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级医院的麻醉科进行。材料与方法:本研究纳入90例选择性下肢蛛网膜下腔阻滞手术患者,男女不限,年龄18-60岁。患者被随机分为三组(每组30人),接受不同剂量的丁丙诺啡治疗。此外,所有患者均接受3ml 0.5%高压布比卡因。使用的统计分析:使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验来找出分类变量之间的关联。组间定量变量的相关性采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,组内定量变量的相关性采用重复测量方差分析检验。结果:三组患者的基线特征如年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师协会的身体状态分类具有可比性。丁丙诺啡剂量越大,感觉阻滞、运动阻滞和总镇痛时间越长。丁丙诺啡100 μg (720 min)和150 μg (825 min)组镇痛时间的平均差异相当。只有服用150 μg丁丙诺啡的患者才会出现心动过缓的副作用。结论:不同剂量丁丙诺啡的风险-收益分析表明,100 μg丁丙诺啡可能是提高脊髓阻滞质量和维持血流动力学稳定性的理想剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Different Doses of Buprenorphine in Combination with Bupivacaine in the Management of Postoperative Analgesia: A Comparative Study.

Background: Longer duration of analgesia, ceiling effect on respiratory depression, and the antihyperalgesia property make buprenorphine a good adjuvant for managing moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of postoperative analgesia of three different doses of buprenorphine of 60, 100, and 150 μg given intrathecally along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.

Setting and design: This prospective observational study was carried out in the anesthesia department of a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: The study included 90 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups (30 each) receiving different doses of buprenorphine. In addition, all patients received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Statistical analysis used: The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to find out the association between the categorical variables. The association of quantitative variables between the groups was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test while within the groups was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance test.

Results: Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification were comparable among the three groups. Sensory block, motor block, and total duration of analgesia were significantly higher with higher doses of buprenorphine. The mean difference in the duration of analgesia was comparable in patients receiving 100 μg (720 min) and 150 μg (825 min) of buprenorphine. Bradycardia as a side effect was only in patients receiving 150 μg of buprenorphine.

Conclusion: Risk-benefit of different doses of buprenorphine suggests that 100 μg may be the ideal dose for a better quality of spinal block and maintaining hemodynamic stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1