家庭血压监测能改善病人的预后吗?比较家庭和动态血压监测对血压控制和患者预后的系统综述。

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Integrated Blood Pressure Control Pub Date : 2015-07-03 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IBPC.S49205
Tonya L Breaux-Shropshire, Eric Judd, Lee A Vucovich, Toneyell S Shropshire, Sonal Singh
{"title":"家庭血压监测能改善病人的预后吗?比较家庭和动态血压监测对血压控制和患者预后的系统综述。","authors":"Tonya L Breaux-Shropshire,&nbsp;Eric Judd,&nbsp;Lee A Vucovich,&nbsp;Toneyell S Shropshire,&nbsp;Sonal Singh","doi":"10.2147/IBPC.S49205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. We also appraised the methodological quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and case-control studies published in English from any year to present that describe HBPM and 24-hour ABPM and report on systolic and/or diastolic BP and/or heart attack, stroke, kidney failure and/or all-cause mortality for adult patients. Due to the nature of the question, studies with only untreated patients were not considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,742 titles and abstractions independently reviewed by two reviewers, 137 studies met predetermined criteria for evaluation. Nineteen studies were identified as relevant and included in the paper. The common themes were that HBPM and ABPM correlated with cardiovascular events and mortality, and targeting HBPM or ABPM resulted in similar outcomes. Associations between BP measurement type and mortality differed by study population. Both the low sensitivity of office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) to detect optimal BP control by ABPM and the added association of HBPM with cardiovascular mortality supported the routine use of HBPM in clinical practice. There was insufficient data to determine the benefit of using HBPM as a measurement standard for BP control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HBPM encourages patient-centered care and improves BP control and patient outcomes. Given the limited number of studies with both HBPM and ABPM, these measurement types should be incorporated into the design of randomized clinical trials within hypertensive populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45299,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","volume":"8 ","pages":"43-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IBPC.S49205","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Tonya L Breaux-Shropshire,&nbsp;Eric Judd,&nbsp;Lee A Vucovich,&nbsp;Toneyell S Shropshire,&nbsp;Sonal Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IBPC.S49205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. We also appraised the methodological quality of studies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and case-control studies published in English from any year to present that describe HBPM and 24-hour ABPM and report on systolic and/or diastolic BP and/or heart attack, stroke, kidney failure and/or all-cause mortality for adult patients. Due to the nature of the question, studies with only untreated patients were not considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,742 titles and abstractions independently reviewed by two reviewers, 137 studies met predetermined criteria for evaluation. Nineteen studies were identified as relevant and included in the paper. The common themes were that HBPM and ABPM correlated with cardiovascular events and mortality, and targeting HBPM or ABPM resulted in similar outcomes. Associations between BP measurement type and mortality differed by study population. Both the low sensitivity of office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) to detect optimal BP control by ABPM and the added association of HBPM with cardiovascular mortality supported the routine use of HBPM in clinical practice. There was insufficient data to determine the benefit of using HBPM as a measurement standard for BP control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HBPM encourages patient-centered care and improves BP control and patient outcomes. Given the limited number of studies with both HBPM and ABPM, these measurement types should be incorporated into the design of randomized clinical trials within hypertensive populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"43-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IBPC.S49205\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S49205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S49205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

目的:我们的目的是比较家庭血压监测(HBPM)和24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)在血压控制和患者预后方面的临床效果。设计:进行系统评价。我们还评估了研究的方法学质量。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (Central)。纳入标准:随机对照试验,前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,观察性研究,以及从任何年份至今发表的英文病例对照研究,这些研究描述了HBPM和24小时ABPM,并报告了收缩压和/或舒张压和/或心脏病发作,中风,肾衰竭和/或全因死亡率。由于问题的性质,未考虑仅对未经治疗的患者进行研究。结果:在两位审稿人独立评审的1742篇标题和摘要中,有137篇研究符合预定的评价标准。19项研究被确定为相关并纳入论文。共同的主题是HBPM和ABPM与心血管事件和死亡率相关,靶向HBPM或ABPM导致相似的结果。血压测量类型与死亡率之间的关系因研究人群而异。办公室血压监测(OBPM)通过ABPM检测最佳血压控制的低灵敏度以及HBPM与心血管死亡率的附加关联都支持HBPM在临床实践中的常规使用。没有足够的数据来确定使用HBPM作为血压控制的测量标准的好处。结论:HBPM鼓励以患者为中心的护理,改善血压控制和患者预后。鉴于HBPM和ABPM的研究数量有限,这些测量类型应纳入高血压人群随机临床试验的设计中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes.

Objective: Our objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on blood pressure (BP) control and patient outcomes.

Design: A systematic review was conducted. We also appraised the methodological quality of studies.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL).

Inclusion criteria: Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, observational studies, and case-control studies published in English from any year to present that describe HBPM and 24-hour ABPM and report on systolic and/or diastolic BP and/or heart attack, stroke, kidney failure and/or all-cause mortality for adult patients. Due to the nature of the question, studies with only untreated patients were not considered.

Results: Of 1,742 titles and abstractions independently reviewed by two reviewers, 137 studies met predetermined criteria for evaluation. Nineteen studies were identified as relevant and included in the paper. The common themes were that HBPM and ABPM correlated with cardiovascular events and mortality, and targeting HBPM or ABPM resulted in similar outcomes. Associations between BP measurement type and mortality differed by study population. Both the low sensitivity of office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) to detect optimal BP control by ABPM and the added association of HBPM with cardiovascular mortality supported the routine use of HBPM in clinical practice. There was insufficient data to determine the benefit of using HBPM as a measurement standard for BP control.

Conclusion: HBPM encourages patient-centered care and improves BP control and patient outcomes. Given the limited number of studies with both HBPM and ABPM, these measurement types should be incorporated into the design of randomized clinical trials within hypertensive populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Blood Pressure Control
Integrated Blood Pressure Control PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Predictors of Depression Symptoms Among Afghan Hypertensive Patients: Secondary Analysis of a Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study. Prevalence of Risk Factors for Hypertension Among Faculty at an Urban University in Uganda [Response to Letter]. Resistance Training in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review on Its Effectiveness in Controlling Risk Factors. Thoughts on "Prevalence of Risk Factors for Hypertension Among Faculty at an Urban University in Uganda" [Letter]. Adherence to Lifestyle Modification Practices and Its Associated Factors Among Hypertensive Patients in Bahir Dar City Hospitals, North West Ethiopia [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1