对一项讲卫生运动干预措施的评估表明,在中部省Hiri区,有可能改善卫生习惯。

Papua and New Guinea medical journal Pub Date : 2013-09-01
Suparat Phuanukoonnon, Elias Namosha, Lydia Kua, Peter M Siba, Andrew R Greenhill
{"title":"对一项讲卫生运动干预措施的评估表明,在中部省Hiri区,有可能改善卫生习惯。","authors":"Suparat Phuanukoonnon,&nbsp;Elias Namosha,&nbsp;Lydia Kua,&nbsp;Peter M Siba,&nbsp;Andrew R Greenhill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions aim to improve health outcomes through provision of safe water supplies and improved sanitation facilities, while also promoting better hygiene practices in communities. Population Services International introduced a WASH intervention project in the Hiri District, Central Province in May 2012. Shortly after its introduction we conducted a survey to determine the uptake of the intervention and gauge its impact. We invited 400 households to participate in the study, which consisted of a questionnaire for the head of the household. A total of 395 questionnaires were completed: 314 from households that had participated in the WASH intervention and 81 that had not (controls). Results demonstrated that improved water sources were not routinely used, with a high dependence on well and surface water. While self-reported handwashing was common, use of soap was not common. Treatment of water inside the house was common in the intervention group (95%), compared to 49% in the non-WASH group. The study indicates that people in the Hiri District are supportive of a WASH intervention, with good uptake of some aspects of the intervention. The sustainability of the intervention remains unknown. Targetted interventions focusing on community priorities might be beneficial in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":76302,"journal":{"name":"Papua and New Guinea medical journal","volume":"56 3-4","pages":"126-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a WASH intervention demonstrates the potential for improved hygiene practices in Hiri District, Central Province.\",\"authors\":\"Suparat Phuanukoonnon,&nbsp;Elias Namosha,&nbsp;Lydia Kua,&nbsp;Peter M Siba,&nbsp;Andrew R Greenhill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions aim to improve health outcomes through provision of safe water supplies and improved sanitation facilities, while also promoting better hygiene practices in communities. Population Services International introduced a WASH intervention project in the Hiri District, Central Province in May 2012. Shortly after its introduction we conducted a survey to determine the uptake of the intervention and gauge its impact. We invited 400 households to participate in the study, which consisted of a questionnaire for the head of the household. A total of 395 questionnaires were completed: 314 from households that had participated in the WASH intervention and 81 that had not (controls). Results demonstrated that improved water sources were not routinely used, with a high dependence on well and surface water. While self-reported handwashing was common, use of soap was not common. Treatment of water inside the house was common in the intervention group (95%), compared to 49% in the non-WASH group. The study indicates that people in the Hiri District are supportive of a WASH intervention, with good uptake of some aspects of the intervention. The sustainability of the intervention remains unknown. Targetted interventions focusing on community priorities might be beneficial in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papua and New Guinea medical journal\",\"volume\":\"56 3-4\",\"pages\":\"126-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papua and New Guinea medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papua and New Guinea medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水、环境卫生和个人卫生(讲卫生)干预措施旨在通过提供安全的供水和改进的环境卫生设施来改善健康结果,同时在社区促进更好的个人卫生习惯。国际人口服务组织于2012年5月在中部省Hiri区实施了一个讲卫生运动干预项目。在引入干预措施后不久,我们进行了一项调查,以确定干预措施的接受程度并评估其影响。我们邀请了400户家庭参与这项研究,其中包括对户主的问卷调查。总共完成了395份问卷:314份来自参加了WASH干预的家庭,81份来自没有参加WASH干预的家庭(对照)。结果表明,改良水源并没有被常规使用,而是高度依赖井水和地表水。虽然自我报告的洗手情况很普遍,但使用肥皂的情况并不普遍。干预组对室内水进行处理的比例为95%,而非wash组为49%。该研究表明,Hiri区的人们支持WASH干预措施,并很好地接受了干预措施的某些方面。干预的可持续性仍不得而知。以社区优先事项为重点的有针对性的干预措施在未来可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a WASH intervention demonstrates the potential for improved hygiene practices in Hiri District, Central Province.

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions aim to improve health outcomes through provision of safe water supplies and improved sanitation facilities, while also promoting better hygiene practices in communities. Population Services International introduced a WASH intervention project in the Hiri District, Central Province in May 2012. Shortly after its introduction we conducted a survey to determine the uptake of the intervention and gauge its impact. We invited 400 households to participate in the study, which consisted of a questionnaire for the head of the household. A total of 395 questionnaires were completed: 314 from households that had participated in the WASH intervention and 81 that had not (controls). Results demonstrated that improved water sources were not routinely used, with a high dependence on well and surface water. While self-reported handwashing was common, use of soap was not common. Treatment of water inside the house was common in the intervention group (95%), compared to 49% in the non-WASH group. The study indicates that people in the Hiri District are supportive of a WASH intervention, with good uptake of some aspects of the intervention. The sustainability of the intervention remains unknown. Targetted interventions focusing on community priorities might be beneficial in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3. Geology 9. Herpetology Index 6. Botany 10. Ornithology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1