全身性癫痫持续状态停止的延迟和相关因素。

Epilepsy research and treatment Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-08-10 DOI:10.1155/2015/591279
Leena Kämppi, Jaakko Ritvanen, Harri Mustonen, Seppo Soinila
{"title":"全身性癫痫持续状态停止的延迟和相关因素。","authors":"Leena Kämppi,&nbsp;Jaakko Ritvanen,&nbsp;Harri Mustonen,&nbsp;Seppo Soinila","doi":"10.1155/2015/591279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. This study was designed to identify the delays and factors related to and predicting the cessation of generalized convulsive SE (GCSE). Methods. This retrospective study includes 70 consecutive patients (>16 years) diagnosed with GCSE and treated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over 2 years. We defined cessation of SE stepwise using clinical seizure freedom, achievement of burst-suppression, and return of consciousness as endpoints and calculated delays for these cessation markers. In addition 10 treatment delay parameters and 7 prognostic and GCSE episode related factors were defined. Multiple statistical analyses were performed on their relation to cessation markers. Results. Onset-to-second-stage-medication (p = 0.027), onset-to-burst-suppression (p = 0.005), and onset-to-clinical-seizure-freedom (p = 0.035) delays correlated with the onset-to-consciousness delay. We detected no correlation between age, epilepsy, STESS, prestatus period, type of SE onset, effect of the first medication, and cessation of SE. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that rapid administration of second-stage medication and early obtainment of clinical seizure freedom and burst-suppression predict early return of consciousness, an unambiguous marker for the end of SE. We propose that delays in treatment chain may be more significant determinants of SE cessation than the previously established outcome predictors. Thus, streamlining the treatment chain is advocated. </p>","PeriodicalId":72948,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy research and treatment","volume":"2015 ","pages":"591279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/591279","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delays and Factors Related to Cessation of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus.\",\"authors\":\"Leena Kämppi,&nbsp;Jaakko Ritvanen,&nbsp;Harri Mustonen,&nbsp;Seppo Soinila\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/591279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction. This study was designed to identify the delays and factors related to and predicting the cessation of generalized convulsive SE (GCSE). Methods. This retrospective study includes 70 consecutive patients (>16 years) diagnosed with GCSE and treated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over 2 years. We defined cessation of SE stepwise using clinical seizure freedom, achievement of burst-suppression, and return of consciousness as endpoints and calculated delays for these cessation markers. In addition 10 treatment delay parameters and 7 prognostic and GCSE episode related factors were defined. Multiple statistical analyses were performed on their relation to cessation markers. Results. Onset-to-second-stage-medication (p = 0.027), onset-to-burst-suppression (p = 0.005), and onset-to-clinical-seizure-freedom (p = 0.035) delays correlated with the onset-to-consciousness delay. We detected no correlation between age, epilepsy, STESS, prestatus period, type of SE onset, effect of the first medication, and cessation of SE. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that rapid administration of second-stage medication and early obtainment of clinical seizure freedom and burst-suppression predict early return of consciousness, an unambiguous marker for the end of SE. We propose that delays in treatment chain may be more significant determinants of SE cessation than the previously established outcome predictors. Thus, streamlining the treatment chain is advocated. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy research and treatment\",\"volume\":\"2015 \",\"pages\":\"591279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/591279\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy research and treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/591279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy research and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/591279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

介绍。本研究旨在确定与全身性惊厥性SE (GCSE)停止相关的延迟和因素。方法。本回顾性研究包括70例连续(>16岁)诊断为GCSE并在三级医院急诊科治疗2年以上的患者。我们以临床发作自由、实现爆发抑制和意识恢复为终点,逐步定义SE的停止,并计算这些停止标志的延迟时间。此外,还定义了10个治疗延迟参数和7个预后和GCSE发作相关因素。对其与戒烟标志物的关系进行了多次统计分析。结果。从发病到第二阶段用药(p = 0.027)、从发病到爆发抑制(p = 0.005)和从发病到临床发作自由(p = 0.035)延迟与发病到意识延迟相关。我们发现年龄、癫痫、压力、前期、SE发作类型、首次用药效果和SE停止之间没有相关性。结论。我们的研究表明,快速给予第二阶段药物治疗和早期获得临床发作自由和爆发抑制可以预测早期意识恢复,这是SE结束的明确标志。我们认为,治疗链的延迟可能是比先前确定的结果预测因素更重要的SE停止决定因素。因此,提倡精简治疗链。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delays and Factors Related to Cessation of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus.

Introduction. This study was designed to identify the delays and factors related to and predicting the cessation of generalized convulsive SE (GCSE). Methods. This retrospective study includes 70 consecutive patients (>16 years) diagnosed with GCSE and treated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over 2 years. We defined cessation of SE stepwise using clinical seizure freedom, achievement of burst-suppression, and return of consciousness as endpoints and calculated delays for these cessation markers. In addition 10 treatment delay parameters and 7 prognostic and GCSE episode related factors were defined. Multiple statistical analyses were performed on their relation to cessation markers. Results. Onset-to-second-stage-medication (p = 0.027), onset-to-burst-suppression (p = 0.005), and onset-to-clinical-seizure-freedom (p = 0.035) delays correlated with the onset-to-consciousness delay. We detected no correlation between age, epilepsy, STESS, prestatus period, type of SE onset, effect of the first medication, and cessation of SE. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that rapid administration of second-stage medication and early obtainment of clinical seizure freedom and burst-suppression predict early return of consciousness, an unambiguous marker for the end of SE. We propose that delays in treatment chain may be more significant determinants of SE cessation than the previously established outcome predictors. Thus, streamlining the treatment chain is advocated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices on Epilepsy among High School Students of Central Nepal. Role of Short Term Video Encephalography with Induction by Verbal Suggestion in Diagnosis of Suspected Paroxysmal Nonepileptic Seizure-Like Symptoms Ketogenic Diet Decreases Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations Related to Epilepsy Assessing a Metacognitive Account of Associative Memory Impairments in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Hippocampography Guides Consistent Mesial Resections in Neocortical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1