延长急诊科住院时间作为颅内出血患者不良结局的预测因子

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2015/526319
Erica M Jones, Amelia K Boehme, Aimee Aysenne, Tiffany Chang, Karen C Albright, Christopher Burns, T Mark Beasley, Sheryl Martin-Schild
{"title":"延长急诊科住院时间作为颅内出血患者不良结局的预测因子","authors":"Erica M Jones,&nbsp;Amelia K Boehme,&nbsp;Aimee Aysenne,&nbsp;Tiffany Chang,&nbsp;Karen C Albright,&nbsp;Christopher Burns,&nbsp;T Mark Beasley,&nbsp;Sheryl Martin-Schild","doi":"10.1155/2015/526319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extended time in the emergency department (ED) has been related to adverse outcomes among stroke patients. We examined the associations of ED nursing shift change (SC) and length of stay in the ED with outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on all spontaneous ICH patients admitted to our stroke center from 7/1/08-6/30/12. Outcomes (frequency of pneumonia, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, NIHSS score at discharge, and mortality rate) were compared based on shift change experience and length of stay (LOS) dichotomized at 5 hours after arrival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 162 patients included, 60 (37.0%) were present in the ED during a SC. The frequency of pneumonia was similar in the two groups. Exposure to an ED SC was not a significant independent predictor of any outcome. LOS in the ED ≥5 hours was a significant independent predictor of discharge mRS 4-6 (OR 3.638, 95% CI 1.531-8.645, and <i>P</i> = 0.0034) and discharge NIHSS (OR 3.049, 95% CI 1.491-6.236, and <i>P</i> = 0.0023) but not death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no association between nursing SC and adverse outcome in patients with ICH but confirms the prior finding of worsened outcome after prolonged length of stay in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"2015 2015","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/526319","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Erica M Jones,&nbsp;Amelia K Boehme,&nbsp;Aimee Aysenne,&nbsp;Tiffany Chang,&nbsp;Karen C Albright,&nbsp;Christopher Burns,&nbsp;T Mark Beasley,&nbsp;Sheryl Martin-Schild\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/526319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extended time in the emergency department (ED) has been related to adverse outcomes among stroke patients. We examined the associations of ED nursing shift change (SC) and length of stay in the ED with outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on all spontaneous ICH patients admitted to our stroke center from 7/1/08-6/30/12. Outcomes (frequency of pneumonia, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, NIHSS score at discharge, and mortality rate) were compared based on shift change experience and length of stay (LOS) dichotomized at 5 hours after arrival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 162 patients included, 60 (37.0%) were present in the ED during a SC. The frequency of pneumonia was similar in the two groups. Exposure to an ED SC was not a significant independent predictor of any outcome. LOS in the ED ≥5 hours was a significant independent predictor of discharge mRS 4-6 (OR 3.638, 95% CI 1.531-8.645, and <i>P</i> = 0.0034) and discharge NIHSS (OR 3.049, 95% CI 1.491-6.236, and <i>P</i> = 0.0023) but not death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no association between nursing SC and adverse outcome in patients with ICH but confirms the prior finding of worsened outcome after prolonged length of stay in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2015 2015\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/526319\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/526319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/526319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:延长在急诊科(ED)的时间与卒中患者的不良结局有关。我们研究了急诊科护理轮班改变(SC)和急诊科住院时间与脑出血(ICH)患者预后的关系。方法:收集我院脑卒中中心7月1日至12月6日收治的所有自发性脑出血患者的资料。根据换班经验和到达后5小时的住院时间(LOS)二分类,比较结果(出院时肺炎频率、修正兰金量表(mRS)评分、出院时NIHSS评分和死亡率)。结果:在纳入的162例患者中,60例(37.0%)在SC期间出现在急诊科。两组中肺炎的发生率相似。暴露于ED SC并不是任何结果的显著独立预测因子。ED≥5小时的LOS是出院mRS 4-6 (OR 3.638, 95% CI 1.531-8.645, P = 0.0034)和出院NIHSS (OR 3.049, 95% CI 1.491-6.236, P = 0.0023)的重要独立预测因子,但不是死亡预测因子。结论:我们的研究没有发现护理SC与脑出血患者不良预后之间的关联,但证实了先前发现的在急诊科停留时间延长后预后恶化的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Objectives: Extended time in the emergency department (ED) has been related to adverse outcomes among stroke patients. We examined the associations of ED nursing shift change (SC) and length of stay in the ED with outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Methods: Data were collected on all spontaneous ICH patients admitted to our stroke center from 7/1/08-6/30/12. Outcomes (frequency of pneumonia, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, NIHSS score at discharge, and mortality rate) were compared based on shift change experience and length of stay (LOS) dichotomized at 5 hours after arrival.

Results: Of the 162 patients included, 60 (37.0%) were present in the ED during a SC. The frequency of pneumonia was similar in the two groups. Exposure to an ED SC was not a significant independent predictor of any outcome. LOS in the ED ≥5 hours was a significant independent predictor of discharge mRS 4-6 (OR 3.638, 95% CI 1.531-8.645, and P = 0.0034) and discharge NIHSS (OR 3.049, 95% CI 1.491-6.236, and P = 0.0023) but not death.

Conclusions: Our study found no association between nursing SC and adverse outcome in patients with ICH but confirms the prior finding of worsened outcome after prolonged length of stay in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Role of Quetiapine in the Prevention of ICU Delirium in Elderly Patients at a High Risk. The Analgesic Effect of Morphine on Peripheral Opioid Receptors: An Experimental Research. Outcome and Determining Characteristics of ICU Patients with Acute Kidney Injury in a Low-Income Country, a Multicenter Experience. Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Center by Life-Saving System in Saudi Arabia. A Propensity Score Matching Observational Study. The Correlation of Hemostatic Parameters with the Development of Early Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy. A Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1