Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas
{"title":"妇科肿瘤学家的可用性对卵巢癌死亡率的影响。","authors":"Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas","doi":"10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":91183,"journal":{"name":"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"3 2","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605894/pdf/nihms725368.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Gynecologic Oncologist Availability on Ovarian Cancer Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"71-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605894/pdf/nihms725368.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定妇科肿瘤学家(GO)的分布与基于人口的卵巢癌死亡率之间的关联:美国人口普查数据补充了美国卵巢癌发病率和死亡率数据,并分析了与执业妇科肿瘤学家的关系。对 GO 所在地进行了地理编码,以便将县级变量与 GO 可用性之间的关联联系起来。采用逻辑回归法测定卵巢癌死亡率高的地区和低的地区,并对环境变量进行调整:结果:在美国,执业的GO分布不均,大都市地区的GO数量最多。卵巢癌的发病率和死亡率随着与执业医生的距离增加而上升。卵巢癌死亡率较高的县相对较少(153 个),在距离执业卵巢专家 24 英里以内,而在距离执业卵巢专家 50 英里或更远的 577 个县中,卵巢癌死亡率较高。与那些距离GO诊所较近的县相比,距离GO诊所50英里或更远的县的卵巢癌高死亡率几率几乎高出60%(OR 1.59,95% CI 1.18-2.15):结论:美国各地GO的分布似乎与卵巢癌死亡率有很大关系。努力促进全球网络向特定人群延伸可能会增加地理上的可及性。未来的研究将从个人层面研究与无法获得GO相关的其他因素(如保险和其他社会经济因素),这将有助于进一步确定美国优质卵巢癌治疗的障碍。
The Effect of Gynecologic Oncologist Availability on Ovarian Cancer Mortality.
Aim: To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.
Materials and methods: Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.
Results: Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).
Conclusion: The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.