妇科肿瘤学家的可用性对卵巢癌死亡率的影响。

World journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2014-05-01 Epub Date: 2014-05-10 DOI:10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71
Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas
{"title":"妇科肿瘤学家的可用性对卵巢癌死亡率的影响。","authors":"Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas","doi":"10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":91183,"journal":{"name":"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"3 2","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605894/pdf/nihms725368.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Gynecologic Oncologist Availability on Ovarian Cancer Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Sherri L Stewart, Darryl Cooney, Shawn Hirsch, Lauren Westervelt, Thomas B Richards, Sun Hee Rim, Cheryll C Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"71-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605894/pdf/nihms725368.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v3.i2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定妇科肿瘤学家(GO)的分布与基于人口的卵巢癌死亡率之间的关联:美国人口普查数据补充了美国卵巢癌发病率和死亡率数据,并分析了与执业妇科肿瘤学家的关系。对 GO 所在地进行了地理编码,以便将县级变量与 GO 可用性之间的关联联系起来。采用逻辑回归法测定卵巢癌死亡率高的地区和低的地区,并对环境变量进行调整:结果:在美国,执业的GO分布不均,大都市地区的GO数量最多。卵巢癌的发病率和死亡率随着与执业医生的距离增加而上升。卵巢癌死亡率较高的县相对较少(153 个),在距离执业卵巢专家 24 英里以内,而在距离执业卵巢专家 50 英里或更远的 577 个县中,卵巢癌死亡率较高。与那些距离GO诊所较近的县相比,距离GO诊所50英里或更远的县的卵巢癌高死亡率几率几乎高出60%(OR 1.59,95% CI 1.18-2.15):结论:美国各地GO的分布似乎与卵巢癌死亡率有很大关系。努力促进全球网络向特定人群延伸可能会增加地理上的可及性。未来的研究将从个人层面研究与无法获得GO相关的其他因素(如保险和其他社会经济因素),这将有助于进一步确定美国优质卵巢癌治疗的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Gynecologic Oncologist Availability on Ovarian Cancer Mortality.

Aim: To determine the association between the distribution of gynecologic oncologist (GO) and population-based ovarian cancer death rates.

Materials and methods: Data on ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in the United States (U.S.) was supplemented with U.S. census data, and analyzed in relation to practicing GOs. GO locations were geocoded to link association between county variables and GO availability. Logistic regression was used to measure areas of high and low ovarian cancer mortality, adjusting for contextual variables.

Results: Practicing GOs were unevenly distributed in the United States, with the greatest numbers in metropolitan areas. Ovarian cancer incidence and death rates increased as distance to a practicing GO increased. A relatively small number (153) of counties within 24 miles of a GO had high ovarian cancer death rates compared to 577 counties located 50 or more miles away with high ovarian cancer death rates. Counties located 50 or more miles away from a GO practice had an almost 60% greater odds of high ovarian cancer mortality compared to those with closer practicing GOs (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.18-2.15).

Conclusion: The distribution of GOs across the United States appears to be significantly associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Efforts that facilitate outreach of GOs to certain populations may increase geographic access. Future studies examining other factors associated with lack of GO access (e.g. insurance and other socioeconomic factors) at the individual level will assist with further defining barriers to quality ovarian cancer care in the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stone accumulation overlying vaginal mesh exposure: A case report Clinical implication of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in early onset preeclampsia: A single-center experience Spilled gallstone mimicking metastasis from cervix cancer on positron emission tomography – computed tomography What to do when it is breech? A state-of-the-art review on management of breech presentation Primary peritoneal hemangioendothelioma simulating an ovarian cyst: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1