{"title":"中国人乳腺癌与XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性无关","authors":"Shuren Guo, Xiaohuan Mao, Liang Ming","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Reported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 7","pages":"10429-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565216/pdf/ijcem0008-10429.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer in Chinese.\",\"authors\":\"Shuren Guo, Xiaohuan Mao, Liang Ming\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Reported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"10429-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565216/pdf/ijcem0008-10429.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:已经进行了许多研究来探索XRCC1多态性与亚洲人乳腺癌(BC)风险的关系,但结果并不一致。因此,我们进行了本荟萃分析来详细探讨这种关系。材料和方法:检索PubMed和万方医学在线1990年至2014年10月15日所报道的研究。我们对符合我们入选标准的13项已发表的病例对照研究进行了荟萃分析。这些研究涉及4984例BC病例和5744例对照中显性(ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln)、隐性(ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln)和共显性(ArgArg vs. GlnGln)遗传模型的XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性。通过Review Manager 5.2和STATE 12计算和分析总优势比(OR)和95% CI。结果:总体而言,在任何遗传模型中都观察到BC风险显著增加(优势模型:优势比[OR] = 1.31, 95%可信区间[CI] = [1.08, 1.58];隐性模型:OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81];共优势模型:OR = 2.52, 95% CI:[1.38, 4.60]),将所有符合条件的研究纳入meta分析。在进一步的分层分析中,在少于三个遗传模型的中国人中,没有发现Arg399Gln多态性与BC风险之间的关联。结论:我们的研究结果表明,XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性可能与亚洲人乳腺癌风险增加有关,中国人群除外。
XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer in Chinese.
Background: A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail.
Materials and methods: Reported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.
Results: Overall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.