药物遗传学:对现代2型糖尿病治疗的启示。

Q3 Medicine Review of Diabetic Studies Pub Date : 2015-09-01 Epub Date: 2016-02-10 DOI:10.1900/RDS.2015.12.363
Harald Staiger, Elke Schaeffeler, Matthias Schwab, Hans-Ulrich Häring
{"title":"药物遗传学:对现代2型糖尿病治疗的启示。","authors":"Harald Staiger,&nbsp;Elke Schaeffeler,&nbsp;Matthias Schwab,&nbsp;Hans-Ulrich Häring","doi":"10.1900/RDS.2015.12.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many clinical treatment studies have reported remarkable interindividual variability in the response to pharmaceutical drugs, and uncovered the existence of inadequate treatment response, non-response, and even adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenetics addresses the impact of genetic variants on treatment outcome including side-effects. In recent years, it has also entered the field of clinical diabetes research. In modern type 2 diabetes therapy, metformin is established as first-line drug. The latest pharmaceutical developments, including incretin mimetics, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (gliptins), and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (gliflozins), are currently experiencing a marked increase in clinical use, while the prescriptions of α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas, meglitinides (glinides), and thiazolidinediones (glitazones) are declining, predominantly because of reported side-effects. This review summarizes the current knowledge about gene-drug interactions observed in therapy studies with the above drugs. We report drug interactions with candidate genes involved in the pharmacokinetics (e.g., drug transporters) and pharmacodynamics (drug targets and downstream signaling steps) of the drugs, with known type 2 diabetes risk genes and previously unknown genes derived from hypothesis-free approaches such as genome-wide association studies. Moreover, some new and promising candidate genes for future pharmacogenetic assessment are highlighted. Finally, we critically appraise the current state of type 2 diabetes pharmacogenetics in the light of its impact on therapeutic decisions, and we refer to major problems, and make suggestions for future efforts in this field to help improve the clinical relevance of the results, and to establish genetically determined treatment failure. </p>","PeriodicalId":34965,"journal":{"name":"Review of Diabetic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5275760/pdf/RevDiabeticStud-12-363.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacogenetics: Implications for Modern Type 2 Diabetes Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Harald Staiger,&nbsp;Elke Schaeffeler,&nbsp;Matthias Schwab,&nbsp;Hans-Ulrich Häring\",\"doi\":\"10.1900/RDS.2015.12.363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many clinical treatment studies have reported remarkable interindividual variability in the response to pharmaceutical drugs, and uncovered the existence of inadequate treatment response, non-response, and even adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenetics addresses the impact of genetic variants on treatment outcome including side-effects. In recent years, it has also entered the field of clinical diabetes research. In modern type 2 diabetes therapy, metformin is established as first-line drug. The latest pharmaceutical developments, including incretin mimetics, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (gliptins), and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (gliflozins), are currently experiencing a marked increase in clinical use, while the prescriptions of α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas, meglitinides (glinides), and thiazolidinediones (glitazones) are declining, predominantly because of reported side-effects. This review summarizes the current knowledge about gene-drug interactions observed in therapy studies with the above drugs. We report drug interactions with candidate genes involved in the pharmacokinetics (e.g., drug transporters) and pharmacodynamics (drug targets and downstream signaling steps) of the drugs, with known type 2 diabetes risk genes and previously unknown genes derived from hypothesis-free approaches such as genome-wide association studies. Moreover, some new and promising candidate genes for future pharmacogenetic assessment are highlighted. Finally, we critically appraise the current state of type 2 diabetes pharmacogenetics in the light of its impact on therapeutic decisions, and we refer to major problems, and make suggestions for future efforts in this field to help improve the clinical relevance of the results, and to establish genetically determined treatment failure. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Diabetic Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5275760/pdf/RevDiabeticStud-12-363.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Diabetic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2015.12.363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Diabetic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2015.12.363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

许多临床治疗研究报告了对药物反应的显著个体差异,并揭示了治疗反应不足、无反应甚至药物不良反应的存在。药物遗传学解决遗传变异对治疗结果的影响,包括副作用。近年来,它也进入了糖尿病临床研究领域。在现代2型糖尿病治疗中,二甲双胍被确立为一线药物。最新的药物开发,包括肠促胰岛素模拟物、二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(格列汀)和钠/葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(格列净),目前临床使用显着增加,而α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、磺脲类、美格列尼酯(格列尼酯)和噻唑烷二酮(格列酮)的处方正在减少,主要是因为报道的副作用。本文综述了目前在上述药物治疗研究中观察到的基因-药物相互作用的知识。我们报告了药物与候选基因的相互作用,这些基因涉及药物的药代动力学(例如,药物转运体)和药效学(药物靶点和下游信号步骤),已知的2型糖尿病风险基因和先前未知的基因,这些基因来自无假设的方法,如全基因组关联研究。此外,还介绍了一些新的、有前景的候选基因,供今后的药物遗传评价参考。最后,我们根据2型糖尿病药物遗传学对治疗决策的影响,对其现状进行了批判性评估,并指出了主要问题,并对该领域未来的努力提出了建议,以帮助提高结果的临床相关性,并建立基因决定的治疗失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacogenetics: Implications for Modern Type 2 Diabetes Therapy.

Many clinical treatment studies have reported remarkable interindividual variability in the response to pharmaceutical drugs, and uncovered the existence of inadequate treatment response, non-response, and even adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenetics addresses the impact of genetic variants on treatment outcome including side-effects. In recent years, it has also entered the field of clinical diabetes research. In modern type 2 diabetes therapy, metformin is established as first-line drug. The latest pharmaceutical developments, including incretin mimetics, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (gliptins), and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (gliflozins), are currently experiencing a marked increase in clinical use, while the prescriptions of α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas, meglitinides (glinides), and thiazolidinediones (glitazones) are declining, predominantly because of reported side-effects. This review summarizes the current knowledge about gene-drug interactions observed in therapy studies with the above drugs. We report drug interactions with candidate genes involved in the pharmacokinetics (e.g., drug transporters) and pharmacodynamics (drug targets and downstream signaling steps) of the drugs, with known type 2 diabetes risk genes and previously unknown genes derived from hypothesis-free approaches such as genome-wide association studies. Moreover, some new and promising candidate genes for future pharmacogenetic assessment are highlighted. Finally, we critically appraise the current state of type 2 diabetes pharmacogenetics in the light of its impact on therapeutic decisions, and we refer to major problems, and make suggestions for future efforts in this field to help improve the clinical relevance of the results, and to establish genetically determined treatment failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Diabetic Studies
Review of Diabetic Studies Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Review of Diabetic Studies (RDS) is the society"s peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. The purpose of The RDS is to support and encourage research in biomedical diabetes-related science including areas such as endocrinology, immunology, epidemiology, genetics, cell-based research, developmental research, bioengineering and disease management.
期刊最新文献
Suboptimal monitoring of glucose levels and poor glycaemic control is associated with increased mortality and length of stay in adult inpatients with diabetes in a tertiary New Zealand hospital Acute effects of the coffee diterpene cafestol on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic subjects with abdominal obesity Geographical variation in diabetes mellitus prevalence rates in Greece Metabolic and immune response to high-fat diet in healthy urban Indonesian males with family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus Health-Related Fitness of Adolescent Boys with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus After Recreational Football Exercise with Caloric Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1