主观与实时:不同药物状态下的编码。

Q3 Psychology International Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Hugo Sanchez-Castillo, Kathleen M Taylor, Ryan D Ward, Diana B Paz-Trejo, Maria Arroyo-Araujo, Oscar Galicia Castillo, Peter D Balsam
{"title":"主观与实时:不同药物状态下的编码。","authors":"Hugo Sanchez-Castillo,&nbsp;Kathleen M Taylor,&nbsp;Ryan D Ward,&nbsp;Diana B Paz-Trejo,&nbsp;Maria Arroyo-Araujo,&nbsp;Oscar Galicia Castillo,&nbsp;Peter D Balsam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes. Several lines of research have suggested that interval timing is modulated by the dopaminergic system. It has been proposed that higher levels of dopamine cause an internal clock to speed up, whereas less dopamine causes a deceleration of the clock. In most experiments the subjects are first trained to perform a timing task while drug free. Consequently, most of what is known about the influence of dopaminergic modulation of timing is on well-established timing performance. In the current study the impact of altered DA on the acquisition of temporal control was the focal question. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were distributed randomly into three different groups (haloperidol, d-amphetamine or vehicle). Each animal received an injection 15 min prior to the start of every session from the beginning of interval training. The subjects were trained in a Fixed Interval (FI) 16s schedule followed by training on a peak procedure in which 64s non-reinforced peak trials were intermixed with FI trials. In a final test session all subjects were given vehicle injections and 10 consecutive non-reinforced peak trials to see if training under drug conditions altered the encoding of time. The current study suggests that administration of drugs that modulate dopamine do not alter the encoding temporal durations but do acutely affect the initiation of responding.</p>","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"28 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective and Real Time: Coding Under Different Drug States.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Sanchez-Castillo,&nbsp;Kathleen M Taylor,&nbsp;Ryan D Ward,&nbsp;Diana B Paz-Trejo,&nbsp;Maria Arroyo-Araujo,&nbsp;Oscar Galicia Castillo,&nbsp;Peter D Balsam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes. Several lines of research have suggested that interval timing is modulated by the dopaminergic system. It has been proposed that higher levels of dopamine cause an internal clock to speed up, whereas less dopamine causes a deceleration of the clock. In most experiments the subjects are first trained to perform a timing task while drug free. Consequently, most of what is known about the influence of dopaminergic modulation of timing is on well-established timing performance. In the current study the impact of altered DA on the acquisition of temporal control was the focal question. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were distributed randomly into three different groups (haloperidol, d-amphetamine or vehicle). Each animal received an injection 15 min prior to the start of every session from the beginning of interval training. The subjects were trained in a Fixed Interval (FI) 16s schedule followed by training on a peak procedure in which 64s non-reinforced peak trials were intermixed with FI trials. In a final test session all subjects were given vehicle injections and 10 consecutive non-reinforced peak trials to see if training under drug conditions altered the encoding of time. The current study suggests that administration of drugs that modulate dopamine do not alter the encoding temporal durations but do acutely affect the initiation of responding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物体不断地从环境的时间结构中提取信息,这使它们能够选择适当的行动并预测即将发生的变化。一些研究表明,间隔时间是由多巴胺能系统调节的。有人提出,较高水平的多巴胺会导致内部时钟加快,而较少的多巴胺会导致时钟减速。在大多数实验中,受试者首先被训练在没有药物的情况下执行计时任务。因此,大多数已知的多巴胺能定时调节的影响是对既定定时性能的影响。在目前的研究中,多巴胺的改变对时间控制习得的影响是焦点问题。30只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠随机分为三组(氟哌啶醇、d-安非他明和载药组)。每只动物在每次间歇训练开始前15分钟接受注射。受试者采用固定间隔(FI) 16秒训练计划,随后采用峰值训练程序,其中64秒非强化峰值试验与FI试验混合进行。在最后的测试阶段,所有受试者都接受了载体注射和10个连续的非强化峰值试验,以观察药物条件下的训练是否改变了时间编码。目前的研究表明,服用调节多巴胺的药物不会改变编码的时间持续时间,但会严重影响反应的开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subjective and Real Time: Coding Under Different Drug States.

Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes. Several lines of research have suggested that interval timing is modulated by the dopaminergic system. It has been proposed that higher levels of dopamine cause an internal clock to speed up, whereas less dopamine causes a deceleration of the clock. In most experiments the subjects are first trained to perform a timing task while drug free. Consequently, most of what is known about the influence of dopaminergic modulation of timing is on well-established timing performance. In the current study the impact of altered DA on the acquisition of temporal control was the focal question. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were distributed randomly into three different groups (haloperidol, d-amphetamine or vehicle). Each animal received an injection 15 min prior to the start of every session from the beginning of interval training. The subjects were trained in a Fixed Interval (FI) 16s schedule followed by training on a peak procedure in which 64s non-reinforced peak trials were intermixed with FI trials. In a final test session all subjects were given vehicle injections and 10 consecutive non-reinforced peak trials to see if training under drug conditions altered the encoding of time. The current study suggests that administration of drugs that modulate dopamine do not alter the encoding temporal durations but do acutely affect the initiation of responding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probable Play Behavior in a Surgeonfish (Naso vlamingii ) A Case Study of Spontaneous Category Formation and Behavioral Expression in a Language-Trained Steller Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus Effortful foraging activity for uncertain food in pigeons Do belugas send sound cues? -Experimental verification of blindfolded imitation among beluga- Comparison of Paired- and Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments using a Runway Task by Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1