“卓越”与排斥:制度竞争力的个体成本。

IF 3.2 2区哲学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Minerva Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5

Richard Watermeyer, Mark Olssen

{"title":"“卓越”与排斥:制度竞争力的个体成本。","authors":"Richard Watermeyer, Mark Olssen","doi":"10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A performance-based funding system like the United Kingdom's 'Research Excellence Framework' (REF) symbolizes the re-rationalization of higher education according to neoliberal ideology and New Public Management technologies. The REF is also significant for disclosing the kinds of behaviour that characterize universities' response to government demands for research auditability. In this paper, we consider the casualties of what Henry Giroux (2014) calls \"neoliberalism's war on higher education\" or more precisely the deleterious consequences of non-participation in the REF. We also discuss the ways with which higher education's competition fetish, embodied within the REF, affects the instrumentalization of academic research and the diminution of academic freedom, autonomy and criticality.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"54 ","pages":"201-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Excellence' and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Watermeyer, Mark Olssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A performance-based funding system like the United Kingdom's 'Research Excellence Framework' (REF) symbolizes the re-rationalization of higher education according to neoliberal ideology and New Public Management technologies. The REF is also significant for disclosing the kinds of behaviour that characterize universities' response to government demands for research auditability. In this paper, we consider the casualties of what Henry Giroux (2014) calls \\\"neoliberalism's war on higher education\\\" or more precisely the deleterious consequences of non-participation in the REF. We also discuss the ways with which higher education's competition fetish, embodied within the REF, affects the instrumentalization of academic research and the diminution of academic freedom, autonomy and criticality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"201-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

像英国的“卓越研究框架”(REF)这样基于绩效的资助体系象征着根据新自由主义意识形态和新公共管理技术对高等教育进行再合理化。REF在披露大学对政府要求的研究可审计性做出反应的行为方面也具有重要意义。在本文中，我们考虑了Henry Giroux(2014)所说的“新自由主义对高等教育的战争”的伤亡，或者更准确地说，不参与REF的有害后果。我们还讨论了REF中体现的高等教育的竞争恋物癖如何影响学术研究的工具化以及学术自由、自主性和批判性的削弱。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

'Excellence' and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness.

A performance-based funding system like the United Kingdom's 'Research Excellence Framework' (REF) symbolizes the re-rationalization of higher education according to neoliberal ideology and New Public Management technologies. The REF is also significant for disclosing the kinds of behaviour that characterize universities' response to government demands for research auditability. In this paper, we consider the casualties of what Henry Giroux (2014) calls "neoliberalism's war on higher education" or more precisely the deleterious consequences of non-participation in the REF. We also discuss the ways with which higher education's competition fetish, embodied within the REF, affects the instrumentalization of academic research and the diminution of academic freedom, autonomy and criticality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Minerva Multiple-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Minerva is devoted to the study of ideas, traditions, cultures and institutions in science, higher education and research. It is concerned no less with history than with present practice, and with the local as well as the global. It speaks to the scholar, the teacher, the policy-maker and the administrator. It features articles, essay reviews and ''special'' issues on themes of topical importance. It represents no single school of thought, but welcomes diversity, within the rules of rational discourse. Its contributions are peer-reviewed. Its audience is world-wide.