9-11岁儿童短食物频率问卷的信度和效度:一项针对三个中等收入和高收入国家的跨国研究。

International journal of obesity supplements Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-12-08 DOI:10.1038/ijosup.2015.15
T Saloheimo, S A González, M Erkkola, D M Milauskas, J D Meisel, C M Champagne, C Tudor-Locke, O Sarmiento, P T Katzmarzyk, M Fogelholm
{"title":"9-11岁儿童短食物频率问卷的信度和效度:一项针对三个中等收入和高收入国家的跨国研究。","authors":"T Saloheimo, S A González, M Erkkola, D M Milauskas, J D Meisel, C M Champagne, C Tudor-Locke, O Sarmiento, P T Katzmarzyk, M Fogelholm","doi":"10.1038/ijosup.2015.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a food frequency questionnaire with 23 food groups (I-FFQ) among a sample of 9-11-year-old children from three different countries that differ on economical development and income distribution, and to assess differences between country sites. Furthermore, we assessed factors associated with I-FFQ's performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an ancillary study of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment. Reliability (n=321) and validity (n=282) components of this study had the same participants. Participation rates were 95% and 70%, respectively. Participants completed two I-FFQs with a mean interval of 4.9 weeks to assess reliability. A 3-day pre-coded food diary (PFD) was used as the reference method in the validity analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and cross-classifications were used to assess the reliability of I-FFQ. Spearman correlation coefficients, percentage difference and cross-classifications were used to assess the validity of I-FFQ. A logistic regression model was used to assess the relation of selected variables with the estimate of validity. Analyses based on information in the PFDs were performed to assess how participants interpreted food groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability correlation coefficients ranged from 0.37 to 0.78 and gross misclassification for all food groups was <5%. Validity correlation coefficients were below 0.5 for 22/23 food groups, and they differed among country sites. For validity, gross misclassification was <5% for 22/23 food groups. Over- or underestimation did not appear for 19/23 food groups. Logistic regression showed that country of participation and parental education were associated (P⩽0.05) with the validity of I-FFQ. Analyses of children's interpretation of food groups suggested that the meaning of most food groups was understood by the children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I-FFQ is a moderately reliable method and its validity ranged from low to moderate, depending on food group and country site.</p>","PeriodicalId":14202,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obesity supplements","volume":"5 Suppl 2","pages":"S22-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/ijosup.2015.15","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability and validity of a short food frequency questionnaire among 9-11-year olds: a multinational study on three middle-income and high-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"T Saloheimo, S A González, M Erkkola, D M Milauskas, J D Meisel, C M Champagne, C Tudor-Locke, O Sarmiento, P T Katzmarzyk, M Fogelholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/ijosup.2015.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a food frequency questionnaire with 23 food groups (I-FFQ) among a sample of 9-11-year-old children from three different countries that differ on economical development and income distribution, and to assess differences between country sites. Furthermore, we assessed factors associated with I-FFQ's performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an ancillary study of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment. Reliability (n=321) and validity (n=282) components of this study had the same participants. Participation rates were 95% and 70%, respectively. Participants completed two I-FFQs with a mean interval of 4.9 weeks to assess reliability. A 3-day pre-coded food diary (PFD) was used as the reference method in the validity analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and cross-classifications were used to assess the reliability of I-FFQ. Spearman correlation coefficients, percentage difference and cross-classifications were used to assess the validity of I-FFQ. A logistic regression model was used to assess the relation of selected variables with the estimate of validity. Analyses based on information in the PFDs were performed to assess how participants interpreted food groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability correlation coefficients ranged from 0.37 to 0.78 and gross misclassification for all food groups was <5%. Validity correlation coefficients were below 0.5 for 22/23 food groups, and they differed among country sites. For validity, gross misclassification was <5% for 22/23 food groups. Over- or underestimation did not appear for 19/23 food groups. Logistic regression showed that country of participation and parental education were associated (P⩽0.05) with the validity of I-FFQ. Analyses of children's interpretation of food groups suggested that the meaning of most food groups was understood by the children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I-FFQ is a moderately reliable method and its validity ranged from low to moderate, depending on food group and country site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obesity supplements\",\"volume\":\"5 Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S22-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/ijosup.2015.15\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obesity supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/ijosup.2015.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obesity supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/ijosup.2015.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是评估来自三个不同国家的9-11岁儿童样本的23个食物组(I-FFQ)食物频率问卷的信度和效度,并评估国家之间的差异,这些国家的经济发展和收入分配存在差异。此外,我们评估了与I-FFQ性能相关的因素。方法:这是一项儿童肥胖、生活方式和环境国际研究的辅助研究。本研究的信度(n=321)和效度(n=282)成分具有相同的参与者。参与率分别为95%和70%。参与者完成了两个i - ffq,平均间隔为4.9周,以评估可靠性。效度分析采用3天预编码饮食日记(PFD)作为参考方法。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验、类内相关系数和交叉分类来评估I-FFQ的信度。采用Spearman相关系数、百分比差异和交叉分类来评估I-FFQ的效度。采用logistic回归模型评估所选变量与效度估计值的关系。根据pfd中的信息进行分析,以评估参与者如何解释食物组。结果:信度相关系数在0.37 ~ 0.78之间,所有食品组的总体误分类为。结论:I-FFQ是一种中等可靠度的方法,其效度在低到中等之间,取决于食品组和国家地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The reliability and validity of a short food frequency questionnaire among 9-11-year olds: a multinational study on three middle-income and high-income countries.

Objective: The main aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a food frequency questionnaire with 23 food groups (I-FFQ) among a sample of 9-11-year-old children from three different countries that differ on economical development and income distribution, and to assess differences between country sites. Furthermore, we assessed factors associated with I-FFQ's performance.

Methods: This was an ancillary study of the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment. Reliability (n=321) and validity (n=282) components of this study had the same participants. Participation rates were 95% and 70%, respectively. Participants completed two I-FFQs with a mean interval of 4.9 weeks to assess reliability. A 3-day pre-coded food diary (PFD) was used as the reference method in the validity analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and cross-classifications were used to assess the reliability of I-FFQ. Spearman correlation coefficients, percentage difference and cross-classifications were used to assess the validity of I-FFQ. A logistic regression model was used to assess the relation of selected variables with the estimate of validity. Analyses based on information in the PFDs were performed to assess how participants interpreted food groups.

Results: Reliability correlation coefficients ranged from 0.37 to 0.78 and gross misclassification for all food groups was <5%. Validity correlation coefficients were below 0.5 for 22/23 food groups, and they differed among country sites. For validity, gross misclassification was <5% for 22/23 food groups. Over- or underestimation did not appear for 19/23 food groups. Logistic regression showed that country of participation and parental education were associated (P⩽0.05) with the validity of I-FFQ. Analyses of children's interpretation of food groups suggested that the meaning of most food groups was understood by the children.

Conclusion: I-FFQ is a moderately reliable method and its validity ranged from low to moderate, depending on food group and country site.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular effects of antiobesity drugs: are the new medicines all the same? Maternal obesity: focus on offspring cardiometabolic outcomes What is the best diet for cardiovascular wellness? A comparison of different nutritional models Sleep disturbances: one of the culprits of obesity-related cardiovascular risk? From obesity through gut microbiota to cardiovascular diseases: a dangerous journey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1