经过这么多年,基因扩增导致表达增加这一广为接受的观念仍然是一个合理但未经证实的假设。

Q1 Environmental Science Journal of Carcinogenesis Pub Date : 2016-05-20 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.4103/1477-3163.182809
Yuping Jia, Lichan Chen, Qingwen Jia, Xixi Dou, Ningzhi Xu, Dezhong Joshua Liao
{"title":"经过这么多年,基因扩增导致表达增加这一广为接受的观念仍然是一个合理但未经证实的假设。","authors":"Yuping Jia,&nbsp;Lichan Chen,&nbsp;Qingwen Jia,&nbsp;Xixi Dou,&nbsp;Ningzhi Xu,&nbsp;Dezhong Joshua Liao","doi":"10.4103/1477-3163.182809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Gene amplification causes overexpression\" is a longstanding and well-accepted concept in cancer genetics. However, raking the whole literature, we find only statistical analyses showing a positive correlation between gene copy number and expression level, but do not find convincing experimental corroboration for this notion, for most of the amplified oncogenes in cancers. Since an association does not need to be an actual causal relation, in our opinion, this widespread notion still remains a reasonable but unproven assumption awaiting experimental verification. </p>","PeriodicalId":52464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Carcinogenesis","volume":"15 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895059/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The well-accepted notion that gene amplification contributes to increased expression still remains, after all these years, a reasonable but unproven assumption.\",\"authors\":\"Yuping Jia,&nbsp;Lichan Chen,&nbsp;Qingwen Jia,&nbsp;Xixi Dou,&nbsp;Ningzhi Xu,&nbsp;Dezhong Joshua Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/1477-3163.182809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"Gene amplification causes overexpression\\\" is a longstanding and well-accepted concept in cancer genetics. However, raking the whole literature, we find only statistical analyses showing a positive correlation between gene copy number and expression level, but do not find convincing experimental corroboration for this notion, for most of the amplified oncogenes in cancers. Since an association does not need to be an actual causal relation, in our opinion, this widespread notion still remains a reasonable but unproven assumption awaiting experimental verification. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Carcinogenesis\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4895059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Carcinogenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.182809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Carcinogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.182809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

“基因扩增导致过度表达”是癌症遗传学中一个长期存在且被广泛接受的概念。然而,纵观整个文献,我们发现只有统计分析显示基因拷贝数与表达水平之间呈正相关,而没有找到令人信服的实验证实这一概念,对于大多数癌症中扩增的致癌基因。由于关联不一定是实际的因果关系,在我们看来,这一广泛传播的概念仍然是一个合理但未经证实的假设,等待实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The well-accepted notion that gene amplification contributes to increased expression still remains, after all these years, a reasonable but unproven assumption.

"Gene amplification causes overexpression" is a longstanding and well-accepted concept in cancer genetics. However, raking the whole literature, we find only statistical analyses showing a positive correlation between gene copy number and expression level, but do not find convincing experimental corroboration for this notion, for most of the amplified oncogenes in cancers. Since an association does not need to be an actual causal relation, in our opinion, this widespread notion still remains a reasonable but unproven assumption awaiting experimental verification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Journal of Carcinogenesis Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Carcinogenesis considers manuscripts in many areas of carcinogenesis and Chemoprevention. Primary areas of interest to the journal include: physical and chemical carcinogenesis and mutagenesis; processes influencing or modulating carcinogenesis, such as DNA repair; genetics, nutrition, and metabolism of carcinogens; the mechanism of action of carcinogens and modulating agents; epidemiological studies; and, the formation, detection, identification, and quantification of environmental carcinogens. Manuscripts that contribute to the understanding of cancer prevention are especially encouraged for submission
期刊最新文献
Molecular classification and stratification of adult diffuse gliomas: A tertiary care center study. Downregulation of Src-family tyrosine kinases by Srcasm and c-Cbl: A comparative analysis. Outcome of routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimen following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Assessment of correlation between clinical staging, functional staging, and histopathological grading of oral submucous fibrosis. Molecular characterization of lung carcinomas: A study on diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic markers using immunohistochemical analysis at a Tertiary Care Center in Uttarakhand, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1