法国预防性输卵管切除术的现状

G. Chene , B. de Rochambeau , K. Le Bail-Carval , E. Beaufils , P. Chabert , G. Mellier , G. Lamblin
{"title":"法国预防性输卵管切除术的现状","authors":"G. Chene ,&nbsp;B. de Rochambeau ,&nbsp;K. Le Bail-Carval ,&nbsp;E. Beaufils ,&nbsp;P. Chabert ,&nbsp;G. Mellier ,&nbsp;G. Lamblin","doi":"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Since the recent evidence of a tubal origin of most ovarian cancers, opportunistic salpingectomy could be discussed as a prophylactic strategy in the general population and with hereditary predisposition. We aimed to survey French gynecological surgeons about their current surgical practice of prophylactic salpingectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An anonymous online survey was sent to French obstetrician-gynaecologists and gynecological surgeons. There were 13 questions about their current clinical practice and techniques of salpingectomy during a benign hysterectomy or as a tubal sterilization method, salpingectomy versus salpingo-oophorectomy in the population with genetic risk, salpingectomy in relationship with endometriosis and questions including histopathological considerations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 569 respondents, opportunistic salpingectomy was always performed between 42.48% and 43.44% during laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal or laparotomic hysterectomy and only 12.26% in case of vaginal route. In the genetic population, salpingo-oophorectomy was mainly performed. Tubal sterilization was often practiced by the hysteroscopic route. More than 90% of respondents didn’t perform salpingectomy in case of endometriosis. There was not any specific tubal histopathological protocol in 71.54% of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Salpingectomy may be a preventing strategy in the low- and high-risk population. The survey's responses show that salpingectomy seems to be a current practice during benign hysterectomy for more than 40% doctors. However, there is not any change with no more salpingectomy in the population with genetic risk, or in case of endometriosis or tubal sterilization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55077,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.003","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"État des lieux de la salpingectomie prophylatique en France\",\"authors\":\"G. Chene ,&nbsp;B. de Rochambeau ,&nbsp;K. Le Bail-Carval ,&nbsp;E. Beaufils ,&nbsp;P. Chabert ,&nbsp;G. Mellier ,&nbsp;G. Lamblin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Since the recent evidence of a tubal origin of most ovarian cancers, opportunistic salpingectomy could be discussed as a prophylactic strategy in the general population and with hereditary predisposition. We aimed to survey French gynecological surgeons about their current surgical practice of prophylactic salpingectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An anonymous online survey was sent to French obstetrician-gynaecologists and gynecological surgeons. There were 13 questions about their current clinical practice and techniques of salpingectomy during a benign hysterectomy or as a tubal sterilization method, salpingectomy versus salpingo-oophorectomy in the population with genetic risk, salpingectomy in relationship with endometriosis and questions including histopathological considerations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 569 respondents, opportunistic salpingectomy was always performed between 42.48% and 43.44% during laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal or laparotomic hysterectomy and only 12.26% in case of vaginal route. In the genetic population, salpingo-oophorectomy was mainly performed. Tubal sterilization was often practiced by the hysteroscopic route. More than 90% of respondents didn’t perform salpingectomy in case of endometriosis. There was not any specific tubal histopathological protocol in 71.54% of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Salpingectomy may be a preventing strategy in the low- and high-risk population. The survey's responses show that salpingectomy seems to be a current practice during benign hysterectomy for more than 40% doctors. However, there is not any change with no more salpingectomy in the population with genetic risk, or in case of endometriosis or tubal sterilization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297958916301321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297958916301321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的由于最近有证据表明大多数卵巢癌起源于输卵管,机会性输卵管切除术可以作为一般人群和遗传易感性的预防策略进行讨论。我们旨在调查法国妇科外科医生目前预防性输卵管切除术的手术实践。方法对法国妇产科医生和妇科外科医生进行匿名在线调查。有13个问题涉及目前的临床实践和输卵管切除术在良性子宫切除术中或作为输卵管绝育方法的技术,输卵管切除术与输卵管卵巢切除术在遗传风险人群中的比较,输卵管切除术与子宫内膜异位症的关系以及包括组织病理学考虑在内的问题。结果569例患者中,腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴道切除或剖宫产切除的机会性输卵管切除术发生率为42.48% ~ 43.44%,阴道切除的机会性输卵管切除术发生率仅为12.26%。在遗传人群中,主要进行输卵管-卵巢切除术。输卵管绝育多采用宫腔镜途径。超过90%的受访者在子宫内膜异位症的情况下没有进行输卵管切除术。71.54%的病例没有明确的输卵管组织病理学方案。结论输卵管切除术可能是低高危人群的一种预防策略。调查结果显示,输卵管切除术似乎是目前超过40%的医生在良性子宫切除术期间的一种做法。然而,在有遗传风险的人群中,或在子宫内膜异位症或输卵管绝育的情况下,不再进行输卵管切除术没有任何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
État des lieux de la salpingectomie prophylatique en France

Objectives

Since the recent evidence of a tubal origin of most ovarian cancers, opportunistic salpingectomy could be discussed as a prophylactic strategy in the general population and with hereditary predisposition. We aimed to survey French gynecological surgeons about their current surgical practice of prophylactic salpingectomy.

Methods

An anonymous online survey was sent to French obstetrician-gynaecologists and gynecological surgeons. There were 13 questions about their current clinical practice and techniques of salpingectomy during a benign hysterectomy or as a tubal sterilization method, salpingectomy versus salpingo-oophorectomy in the population with genetic risk, salpingectomy in relationship with endometriosis and questions including histopathological considerations.

Results

Among the 569 respondents, opportunistic salpingectomy was always performed between 42.48% and 43.44% during laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal or laparotomic hysterectomy and only 12.26% in case of vaginal route. In the genetic population, salpingo-oophorectomy was mainly performed. Tubal sterilization was often practiced by the hysteroscopic route. More than 90% of respondents didn’t perform salpingectomy in case of endometriosis. There was not any specific tubal histopathological protocol in 71.54% of cases.

Conclusions

Salpingectomy may be a preventing strategy in the low- and high-risk population. The survey's responses show that salpingectomy seems to be a current practice during benign hysterectomy for more than 40% doctors. However, there is not any change with no more salpingectomy in the population with genetic risk, or in case of endometriosis or tubal sterilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Hysterosonography]. Editorial Board Cancer du sein et diabète de type 2 : des interactions complexes [Does the use of deodorant cause breast cancer? It remains to be proved]. Tumors in recent Prehistory. Contributions from Cova des Pas (Menorca Island).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1