在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(sab)下择期剖宫产术中,连续无创动脉压仪作为识别血压波动的辅助手段。

Deepak Gupta, Vitaly Soskin, Milos Marjanovic, Hassan Amhaz, Ashish Mazumdar
{"title":"在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(sab)下择期剖宫产术中,连续无创动脉压仪作为识别血压波动的辅助手段。","authors":"Deepak Gupta,&nbsp;Vitaly Soskin,&nbsp;Milos Marjanovic,&nbsp;Hassan Amhaz,&nbsp;Ashish Mazumdar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in less than one minute intervals (STAT NIBP measurements) is not always feasible. Therefore, large number of undetectable hypotension episodes can only be recognized with continuous beat to beat monitoring of blood pressure, for example, by continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitor (CNAP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether CNAP correlates well with conventional intermittent oscillometric NIBP during elective cesarean sections under subarachnoid blockade (SAB) and whether CNAP based patient management results in improved immediate maternal vasopressor requirements and improved immediate fetal/neonatal outcomes compared with NIBP based patient management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The CNAP finger cuff together with the CNAP arm cuff were placed on the same arm which also had the peripheral intravenous access.. On the contralateral arm the conventional NIBP arm cuff was placed. Study Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the CNAP monitor readings. Control Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the NIBP monitor readings. Results: The CNAP-based treatment (study) group had a statistically significant lower use of oxytocin and lower estimated blood loss than the NIBP-based treatment (control) group. The differences in incidences of vasopressors use and peri-operative nausea vomiting between study group and control group did not reach statistical significance. CNAP readings were more likely to be in systolic hypotensive phases (<l00mmHg) and diastolic hypertensive phases (>80mmHg) as compared to NIBP readings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) device may ONLY act as an adjunct to recognize fluctuating blood pressures during elective cesarean section under subarachnoid blockade (SAB).</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"23 4","pages":"385-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTINUOUS NON-INVASIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE DEVICE AS AN ADJUNCT TO RECOGNIZE FLUCTUATING BLOOD PRESSURES DURING ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION UNDER SUBARACHNOID BLOCKADE (SAB).\",\"authors\":\"Deepak Gupta,&nbsp;Vitaly Soskin,&nbsp;Milos Marjanovic,&nbsp;Hassan Amhaz,&nbsp;Ashish Mazumdar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in less than one minute intervals (STAT NIBP measurements) is not always feasible. Therefore, large number of undetectable hypotension episodes can only be recognized with continuous beat to beat monitoring of blood pressure, for example, by continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitor (CNAP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether CNAP correlates well with conventional intermittent oscillometric NIBP during elective cesarean sections under subarachnoid blockade (SAB) and whether CNAP based patient management results in improved immediate maternal vasopressor requirements and improved immediate fetal/neonatal outcomes compared with NIBP based patient management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The CNAP finger cuff together with the CNAP arm cuff were placed on the same arm which also had the peripheral intravenous access.. On the contralateral arm the conventional NIBP arm cuff was placed. Study Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the CNAP monitor readings. Control Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the NIBP monitor readings. Results: The CNAP-based treatment (study) group had a statistically significant lower use of oxytocin and lower estimated blood loss than the NIBP-based treatment (control) group. The differences in incidences of vasopressors use and peri-operative nausea vomiting between study group and control group did not reach statistical significance. CNAP readings were more likely to be in systolic hypotensive phases (<l00mmHg) and diastolic hypertensive phases (>80mmHg) as compared to NIBP readings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) device may ONLY act as an adjunct to recognize fluctuating blood pressures during elective cesarean section under subarachnoid blockade (SAB).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"385-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:间隔不到一分钟测量无创血压(NIBP) (STAT NIBP测量)并不总是可行的。因此,大量无法检测到的低血压发作只能通过连续的逐拍血压监测来识别,例如连续无创动脉压力监测仪(CNAP)。目的:本研究的目的是探讨在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)下的选择性剖宫产术中,CNAP是否与传统间歇振荡NIBP有良好的相关性,以及与基于NIBP的患者管理相比,基于CNAP的患者管理是否能改善产妇的即时血管加压素需求和改善胎儿/新生儿的即时预后。材料与方法:将CNAP手指袖带与CNAP手臂袖带放置在同一只有外周静脉通路的手臂上。在对侧手臂放置传统的NIBP臂袖带。实验组:由麻醉提供者根据CNAP监护读数对患者进行管理。对照组:由麻醉医师根据NIBP监测数据对患者进行管理。结果:以cnap为基础的治疗(研究)组与以nibp为基础的治疗(对照组)相比,催产素的使用和估计失血量均有统计学意义上的降低。研究组与对照组血管加压药使用及围手术期恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义。与NIBP读数相比,CNAP读数更有可能处于收缩期(80mmHg)。结论:连续无创动脉压(CNAP)装置可能仅作为蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)下择期剖宫产术中血压波动的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CONTINUOUS NON-INVASIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE DEVICE AS AN ADJUNCT TO RECOGNIZE FLUCTUATING BLOOD PRESSURES DURING ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION UNDER SUBARACHNOID BLOCKADE (SAB).

Background: Measuring non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in less than one minute intervals (STAT NIBP measurements) is not always feasible. Therefore, large number of undetectable hypotension episodes can only be recognized with continuous beat to beat monitoring of blood pressure, for example, by continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitor (CNAP).

Objective: The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether CNAP correlates well with conventional intermittent oscillometric NIBP during elective cesarean sections under subarachnoid blockade (SAB) and whether CNAP based patient management results in improved immediate maternal vasopressor requirements and improved immediate fetal/neonatal outcomes compared with NIBP based patient management.

Materials and methods: The CNAP finger cuff together with the CNAP arm cuff were placed on the same arm which also had the peripheral intravenous access.. On the contralateral arm the conventional NIBP arm cuff was placed. Study Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the CNAP monitor readings. Control Group: The patients were managed by the anesthesia provider based on the NIBP monitor readings. Results: The CNAP-based treatment (study) group had a statistically significant lower use of oxytocin and lower estimated blood loss than the NIBP-based treatment (control) group. The differences in incidences of vasopressors use and peri-operative nausea vomiting between study group and control group did not reach statistical significance. CNAP readings were more likely to be in systolic hypotensive phases (80mmHg) as compared to NIBP readings.

Conclusion: Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) device may ONLY act as an adjunct to recognize fluctuating blood pressures during elective cesarean section under subarachnoid blockade (SAB).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
期刊最新文献
Amniotic fluid embolism. THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN MODERATE TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CONTROLLED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Dose-Dependent Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Ketamine in Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Effects of Circuit Leak Development Over Time and Response During Low-Flow Volume and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation. Post-Partum Malignant Hypertension in a Patient with Preeclampsia and Abruptio Placenta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1