对于糖耐量受损的老年人和年轻人来说,吡格列酮对预防糖尿病同样有效。

AGE Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6
Sara E Espinoza, Chen-Pin Wang, Devjit Tripathy, Stephen C Clement, Dawn C Schwenke, Mary Ann Banerji, George A Bray, Thomas A Buchanan, Robert R Henry, Abbas E Kitabchi, Sunder Mudaliar, Frankie B Stentz, Peter D Reaven, Ralph A DeFronzo, Nicolas Musi
{"title":"对于糖耐量受损的老年人和年轻人来说,吡格列酮对预防糖尿病同样有效。","authors":"Sara E Espinoza, Chen-Pin Wang, Devjit Tripathy, Stephen C Clement, Dawn C Schwenke, Mary Ann Banerji, George A Bray, Thomas A Buchanan, Robert R Henry, Abbas E Kitabchi, Sunder Mudaliar, Frankie B Stentz, Peter D Reaven, Ralph A DeFronzo, Nicolas Musi","doi":"10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW study (NEJM 364:1104-1115, 2011). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to development of diabetes over a mean of 2 years between older (≥61 years) and younger participants. We compared effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on metabolic profiles, inflammatory markers, adipokines, β cell function (disposition index), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and body composition by ANOVA. Diabetes incidence was reduced by 85 % in older and 69 % in younger subjects (p = 0.41). β cell function (disposition index) increased by 35.0 % in the older and 26.7 % in younger subjects (p = 0.83). Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) increased by 3.07 (5.2-fold) in older and by 2.54 (3.8-fold) in younger participants (p = 0.58). Pioglitazone more effectively increased adiponectin in older versus younger subjects (22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7-fold] vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2-fold], respectively; p = 0.04). Younger subjects tended to have a greater increase in whole body fat mass compared to older subjects (3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061). Younger and older subjects had similar decreases in bone mineral density (0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). Younger and older pre-diabetic adults taking pioglitazone had similar reductions in conversion to diabetes and older adults had similar or greater improvements in metabolic risk factors, demonstrating that pioglitazone is useful in preventing diabetes in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7632,"journal":{"name":"AGE","volume":"38 5-6","pages":"485-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance.\",\"authors\":\"Sara E Espinoza, Chen-Pin Wang, Devjit Tripathy, Stephen C Clement, Dawn C Schwenke, Mary Ann Banerji, George A Bray, Thomas A Buchanan, Robert R Henry, Abbas E Kitabchi, Sunder Mudaliar, Frankie B Stentz, Peter D Reaven, Ralph A DeFronzo, Nicolas Musi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW study (NEJM 364:1104-1115, 2011). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to development of diabetes over a mean of 2 years between older (≥61 years) and younger participants. We compared effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on metabolic profiles, inflammatory markers, adipokines, β cell function (disposition index), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and body composition by ANOVA. Diabetes incidence was reduced by 85 % in older and 69 % in younger subjects (p = 0.41). β cell function (disposition index) increased by 35.0 % in the older and 26.7 % in younger subjects (p = 0.83). Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) increased by 3.07 (5.2-fold) in older and by 2.54 (3.8-fold) in younger participants (p = 0.58). Pioglitazone more effectively increased adiponectin in older versus younger subjects (22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7-fold] vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2-fold], respectively; p = 0.04). Younger subjects tended to have a greater increase in whole body fat mass compared to older subjects (3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061). Younger and older subjects had similar decreases in bone mineral density (0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). Younger and older pre-diabetic adults taking pioglitazone had similar reductions in conversion to diabetes and older adults had similar or greater improvements in metabolic risk factors, demonstrating that pioglitazone is useful in preventing diabetes in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AGE\",\"volume\":\"38 5-6\",\"pages\":\"485-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AGE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定吡格列酮对老年糖尿病前期患者和年轻糖尿病前期患者预防2型糖尿病的疗效。在 ACT NOW 研究(《美国国家医学杂志》,364:1104-1115,2011 年)中,有 62 名糖耐量受损 (IGT) 的参与者以双盲方式随机接受安慰剂或吡格列酮治疗,以预防糖尿病。我们使用 Cox 比例危险回归法对年龄较大(≥61 岁)和年龄较小的参与者在平均 2 年的时间内患糖尿病的时间进行了比较。我们通过方差分析比较了吡格列酮与安慰剂对代谢概况、炎症标志物、脂肪因子、β细胞功能(处置指数)、胰岛素敏感性(松田指数)和身体成分的影响。老年人和年轻人的糖尿病发病率分别降低了 85% 和 69%(P = 0.41)。老年人的 β 细胞功能(处置指数)增加了 35.0%,年轻人增加了 26.7%(p = 0.83)。胰岛素敏感性(松田指数)在老年受试者中增加了 3.07(5.2 倍),在年轻受试者中增加了 2.54(3.8 倍)(p = 0.58)。与年轻受试者相比,吡格列酮能更有效地增加老年受试者的脂肪连蛋白(分别为 22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7 倍] 与 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2 倍];p = 0.04)。与年龄较大的受试者相比,年轻受试者全身脂肪量的增加幅度更大(3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061)。年轻和年长受试者的骨质密度下降幅度相似(0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm2)。服用吡格列酮的年轻和年长糖尿病前期成人在转化为糖尿病方面的降幅相似,而年长者在代谢风险因素方面的改善幅度相似或更大,这表明吡格列酮对预防年长者糖尿病很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance.

To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW study (NEJM 364:1104-1115, 2011). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to development of diabetes over a mean of 2 years between older (≥61 years) and younger participants. We compared effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on metabolic profiles, inflammatory markers, adipokines, β cell function (disposition index), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and body composition by ANOVA. Diabetes incidence was reduced by 85 % in older and 69 % in younger subjects (p = 0.41). β cell function (disposition index) increased by 35.0 % in the older and 26.7 % in younger subjects (p = 0.83). Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) increased by 3.07 (5.2-fold) in older and by 2.54 (3.8-fold) in younger participants (p = 0.58). Pioglitazone more effectively increased adiponectin in older versus younger subjects (22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7-fold] vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2-fold], respectively; p = 0.04). Younger subjects tended to have a greater increase in whole body fat mass compared to older subjects (3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061). Younger and older subjects had similar decreases in bone mineral density (0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm2). Younger and older pre-diabetic adults taking pioglitazone had similar reductions in conversion to diabetes and older adults had similar or greater improvements in metabolic risk factors, demonstrating that pioglitazone is useful in preventing diabetes in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AGE
AGE 医学-老年医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
News & Views Aging in America Tinetti mobility test is related to muscle mass and strength in non-institutionalized elderly people. Age-associated vulval integrity is an important marker of nematode healthspan. Interspecific correlation between red blood cell mitochondrial ROS production, cardiolipin content and longevity in birds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1