利伐沙班对推定为原发性免疫介导的溶血性贫血犬的安全性和耐受性评价。

Alice Morassi, Domenico Bianco, Ed Park, Reid K Nakamura, George A White
{"title":"利伐沙班对推定为原发性免疫介导的溶血性贫血犬的安全性和耐受性评价。","authors":"Alice Morassi,&nbsp;Domenico Bianco,&nbsp;Ed Park,&nbsp;Reid K Nakamura,&nbsp;George A White","doi":"10.1111/vec.12480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban (RIV), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitory drug, in dogs with presumed primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (pIMHA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, positive-controlled, unblinded clinical trial. Client-owned dogs were enrolled between October 2012 and March 2014.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private referral centers.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-four client-owned dogs with pIMHA. Enrolled dogs were randomized in 2 treatment groups to receive by mouth RIV or clopidogrel (CL) and low-dose aspirin (LDA). All dogs were monitored for 90 days from the enrollment in the study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Enrolled dogs were given a standardized immunosuppressive protocol and RIV or CL and LDA.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There was no identifiable adverse drug reaction, evidence of hemorrhage, significant prolongation of prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time, or increase in transfusion requirements associated with RIV therapy compared to CL and LDA in dogs with pIMHA. There was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to thrombotic events, survival rates to discharge, at 1 month and 3 months from diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that RIV at a median dose of 0.89 mg/kg by mouth once daily was safe and well tolerated in a small group of dogs with presumed pIMHA able to tolerate oral medications and treated with a standardized immunosuppressive treatment protocol. Conclusions regarding the relative efficacy of RIV as compared to CL and LDA cannot be made due to the small size of the treatment groups and because pharmacodynamic effects were not assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12480","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban in dogs with presumed primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Morassi,&nbsp;Domenico Bianco,&nbsp;Ed Park,&nbsp;Reid K Nakamura,&nbsp;George A White\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.12480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban (RIV), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitory drug, in dogs with presumed primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (pIMHA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, positive-controlled, unblinded clinical trial. Client-owned dogs were enrolled between October 2012 and March 2014.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private referral centers.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-four client-owned dogs with pIMHA. Enrolled dogs were randomized in 2 treatment groups to receive by mouth RIV or clopidogrel (CL) and low-dose aspirin (LDA). All dogs were monitored for 90 days from the enrollment in the study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Enrolled dogs were given a standardized immunosuppressive protocol and RIV or CL and LDA.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>There was no identifiable adverse drug reaction, evidence of hemorrhage, significant prolongation of prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time, or increase in transfusion requirements associated with RIV therapy compared to CL and LDA in dogs with pIMHA. There was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to thrombotic events, survival rates to discharge, at 1 month and 3 months from diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that RIV at a median dose of 0.89 mg/kg by mouth once daily was safe and well tolerated in a small group of dogs with presumed pIMHA able to tolerate oral medications and treated with a standardized immunosuppressive treatment protocol. Conclusions regarding the relative efficacy of RIV as compared to CL and LDA cannot be made due to the small size of the treatment groups and because pharmacodynamic effects were not assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vec.12480\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

目的:评价口服直接因子Xa抑制药物利伐沙班(RIV)对原发性免疫介导性溶血性贫血(pIMHA)犬的安全性和耐受性。设计:前瞻性、多中心、阳性对照、非盲法临床试验。客户拥有的狗在2012年10月至2014年3月期间被招募。设置:私人转诊中心。动物:24只客户拥有的患有pIMHA的狗。入选的狗随机分为2个治疗组,分别口服RIV或氯吡格雷(CL)和低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)。从研究登记开始,对所有狗进行了90天的监测。干预措施:入选的狗给予标准化的免疫抑制方案和RIV或CL和LDA。测量结果和主要结果:在pIMHA犬中,与CL和LDA相比,RIV治疗没有可识别的药物不良反应、出血证据、凝血酶原时间或部分凝血活酶活化时间明显延长,或输血需求增加。两组患者在诊断后1个月和3个月的血栓事件、出院存活率方面无显著差异。结论:这项研究表明,在一小群假定患有pIMHA的狗中,每日一次口服0.89 mg/kg的中位剂量RIV是安全的,并且耐受性良好,这些狗能够耐受口服药物并接受标准化的免疫抑制治疗方案。由于治疗组的规模较小,并且没有评估药效学效应,因此无法得出关于RIV与CL和LDA相比的相对疗效的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban in dogs with presumed primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban (RIV), an oral direct factor Xa inhibitory drug, in dogs with presumed primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (pIMHA).

Design: Prospective, multicenter, positive-controlled, unblinded clinical trial. Client-owned dogs were enrolled between October 2012 and March 2014.

Setting: Private referral centers.

Animals: Twenty-four client-owned dogs with pIMHA. Enrolled dogs were randomized in 2 treatment groups to receive by mouth RIV or clopidogrel (CL) and low-dose aspirin (LDA). All dogs were monitored for 90 days from the enrollment in the study.

Interventions: Enrolled dogs were given a standardized immunosuppressive protocol and RIV or CL and LDA.

Measurements and main results: There was no identifiable adverse drug reaction, evidence of hemorrhage, significant prolongation of prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time, or increase in transfusion requirements associated with RIV therapy compared to CL and LDA in dogs with pIMHA. There was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to thrombotic events, survival rates to discharge, at 1 month and 3 months from diagnosis.

Conclusions: This study suggests that RIV at a median dose of 0.89 mg/kg by mouth once daily was safe and well tolerated in a small group of dogs with presumed pIMHA able to tolerate oral medications and treated with a standardized immunosuppressive treatment protocol. Conclusions regarding the relative efficacy of RIV as compared to CL and LDA cannot be made due to the small size of the treatment groups and because pharmacodynamic effects were not assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine. Development and implementation of a hemovigilance program at a university veterinary teaching hospital. 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2021. Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1