用多元线性回归重建基因调控网络解决级联误差问题。

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Advances in Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-29 DOI:10.1155/2017/4827171
Faridah Hani Mohamed Salleh, Suhaila Zainudin, Shereena M Arif
{"title":"用多元线性回归重建基因调控网络解决级联误差问题。","authors":"Faridah Hani Mohamed Salleh,&nbsp;Suhaila Zainudin,&nbsp;Shereena M Arif","doi":"10.1155/2017/4827171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene regulatory network (GRN) reconstruction is the process of identifying regulatory gene interactions from experimental data through computational analysis. One of the main reasons for the reduced performance of previous GRN methods had been inaccurate prediction of cascade motifs. Cascade error is defined as the wrong prediction of cascade motifs, where an indirect interaction is misinterpreted as a direct interaction. Despite the active research on various GRN prediction methods, the discussion on specific methods to solve problems related to cascade errors is still lacking. In fact, the experiments conducted by the past studies were not specifically geared towards proving the ability of GRN prediction methods in avoiding the occurrences of cascade errors. Hence, this research aims to propose Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) to infer GRN from gene expression data and to avoid wrongly inferring of an indirect interaction (A → B → C) as a direct interaction (A → C). Since the number of observations of the real experiment datasets was far less than the number of predictors, some predictors were eliminated by extracting the random subnetworks from global interaction networks via an established extraction method. In addition, the experiment was extended to assess the effectiveness of MLR in dealing with cascade error by using a novel experimental procedure that had been proposed in this work. The experiment revealed that the number of cascade errors had been very minimal. Apart from that, the Belsley collinearity test proved that multicollinearity did affect the datasets used in this experiment greatly. All the tested subnetworks obtained satisfactory results, with AUROC values above 0.5.</p>","PeriodicalId":39059,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Bioinformatics","volume":"2017 ","pages":"4827171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/4827171","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Linear Regression for Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks in Solving Cascade Error Problems.\",\"authors\":\"Faridah Hani Mohamed Salleh,&nbsp;Suhaila Zainudin,&nbsp;Shereena M Arif\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/4827171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gene regulatory network (GRN) reconstruction is the process of identifying regulatory gene interactions from experimental data through computational analysis. One of the main reasons for the reduced performance of previous GRN methods had been inaccurate prediction of cascade motifs. Cascade error is defined as the wrong prediction of cascade motifs, where an indirect interaction is misinterpreted as a direct interaction. Despite the active research on various GRN prediction methods, the discussion on specific methods to solve problems related to cascade errors is still lacking. In fact, the experiments conducted by the past studies were not specifically geared towards proving the ability of GRN prediction methods in avoiding the occurrences of cascade errors. Hence, this research aims to propose Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) to infer GRN from gene expression data and to avoid wrongly inferring of an indirect interaction (A → B → C) as a direct interaction (A → C). Since the number of observations of the real experiment datasets was far less than the number of predictors, some predictors were eliminated by extracting the random subnetworks from global interaction networks via an established extraction method. In addition, the experiment was extended to assess the effectiveness of MLR in dealing with cascade error by using a novel experimental procedure that had been proposed in this work. The experiment revealed that the number of cascade errors had been very minimal. Apart from that, the Belsley collinearity test proved that multicollinearity did affect the datasets used in this experiment greatly. All the tested subnetworks obtained satisfactory results, with AUROC values above 0.5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"4827171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/4827171\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4827171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4827171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

基因调控网络(GRN)重构是通过计算分析从实验数据中识别调控基因相互作用的过程。以往GRN方法性能下降的主要原因之一是对级联基序的预测不准确。级联误差被定义为对级联基序的错误预测,其中间接相互作用被误解为直接相互作用。尽管各种GRN预测方法的研究非常活跃,但对于解决级联误差相关问题的具体方法的讨论仍然缺乏。事实上,过去的研究所做的实验并没有专门针对证明GRN预测方法在避免级联误差发生方面的能力。因此,本研究旨在提出多元线性回归(Multiple Linear Regression, MLR)从基因表达数据中推断GRN,避免将间接相互作用(A→B→C)错误地推断为直接相互作用(A→C)。由于实际实验数据集的观测数量远远少于预测因子的数量,因此,通过现有的提取方法从全局相互作用网络中提取随机子网络,可以消除一些预测因子。此外,本实验还扩展到使用本工作中提出的一种新的实验程序来评估MLR处理级联误差的有效性。实验表明,级联误差的数量非常小。除此之外,Belsley共线性检验证明多重共线性确实对实验中使用的数据集有很大的影响。所有测试子网均获得满意的结果,AUROC值均在0.5以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiple Linear Regression for Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks in Solving Cascade Error Problems.

Gene regulatory network (GRN) reconstruction is the process of identifying regulatory gene interactions from experimental data through computational analysis. One of the main reasons for the reduced performance of previous GRN methods had been inaccurate prediction of cascade motifs. Cascade error is defined as the wrong prediction of cascade motifs, where an indirect interaction is misinterpreted as a direct interaction. Despite the active research on various GRN prediction methods, the discussion on specific methods to solve problems related to cascade errors is still lacking. In fact, the experiments conducted by the past studies were not specifically geared towards proving the ability of GRN prediction methods in avoiding the occurrences of cascade errors. Hence, this research aims to propose Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) to infer GRN from gene expression data and to avoid wrongly inferring of an indirect interaction (A → B → C) as a direct interaction (A → C). Since the number of observations of the real experiment datasets was far less than the number of predictors, some predictors were eliminated by extracting the random subnetworks from global interaction networks via an established extraction method. In addition, the experiment was extended to assess the effectiveness of MLR in dealing with cascade error by using a novel experimental procedure that had been proposed in this work. The experiment revealed that the number of cascade errors had been very minimal. Apart from that, the Belsley collinearity test proved that multicollinearity did affect the datasets used in this experiment greatly. All the tested subnetworks obtained satisfactory results, with AUROC values above 0.5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Bioinformatics
Advances in Bioinformatics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational Genomics A Guide to RNAseq Data Analysis Using Bioinformatics Approaches Computational Metabolomics Bioinformatics in Personalized Medicine Bioinformatics Tools for Gene and Genome Annotation Analysis of Microbes for Synthetic Biology and Cancer Biology Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1