西班牙公立医院使用的知情同意文件的全球可读性分析

M.I. Mariscal-Crespo , M.V. Coronado-Vázquez , M.V. Ramirez-Durán
{"title":"西班牙公立医院使用的知情同意文件的全球可读性分析","authors":"M.I. Mariscal-Crespo ,&nbsp;M.V. Coronado-Vázquez ,&nbsp;M.V. Ramirez-Durán","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyse the readability of informed consent forms (ICF) used in Public Hospitals throughout Spain, with the aim of checking their function of providing comprehensive information to people who are making any health decision no matter where they are in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was performed on a total of 11,339 ICF received from all over Spanish territory, of which 1617 ICF were collected from 4 web pages of Health Portal and the rest (9722) were received through email and/or telephone contact from March 2012 to February 2013. The readability level was studied using the Inflesz tool. A total of 372 ICF were selected and analysed using simple random sampling. The Inflesz scale and the Flesch-Szigriszt index were used to analyse the readability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The readability results showed that 62.4% of the ICF were rated as a “little difficult”, the 23.4% as “normal”, and the 13.4% were rated as “very difficult”. The highest readability means using the Flesch index were scored in Andalusia with a mean of 56.99 (95% CI; 55.42-58.57) and Valencia with a mean of 51.93 (95% CI; 48.4-55.52). The lowest readability means were in Galicia with a mean of 40.77 (95% CI; 9.83-71.71) and Melilla, mean<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->41.82 (95% CI; 35.5-48.14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The readability level of Spanish informed consent forms must be improved because their scores using readability tools could not be classified in normal scales. Furthermore, there was very wide variability among Spanish ICF, which showed a lack of equity in information access among Spanish citizens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis global de la legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado utilizados en los hospitales públicos de España\",\"authors\":\"M.I. Mariscal-Crespo ,&nbsp;M.V. Coronado-Vázquez ,&nbsp;M.V. Ramirez-Durán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyse the readability of informed consent forms (ICF) used in Public Hospitals throughout Spain, with the aim of checking their function of providing comprehensive information to people who are making any health decision no matter where they are in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A descriptive study was performed on a total of 11,339 ICF received from all over Spanish territory, of which 1617 ICF were collected from 4 web pages of Health Portal and the rest (9722) were received through email and/or telephone contact from March 2012 to February 2013. The readability level was studied using the Inflesz tool. A total of 372 ICF were selected and analysed using simple random sampling. The Inflesz scale and the Flesch-Szigriszt index were used to analyse the readability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The readability results showed that 62.4% of the ICF were rated as a “little difficult”, the 23.4% as “normal”, and the 13.4% were rated as “very difficult”. The highest readability means using the Flesch index were scored in Andalusia with a mean of 56.99 (95% CI; 55.42-58.57) and Valencia with a mean of 51.93 (95% CI; 48.4-55.52). The lowest readability means were in Galicia with a mean of 40.77 (95% CI; 9.83-71.71) and Melilla, mean<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->41.82 (95% CI; 35.5-48.14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The readability level of Spanish informed consent forms must be improved because their scores using readability tools could not be classified in normal scales. Furthermore, there was very wide variability among Spanish ICF, which showed a lack of equity in information access among Spanish citizens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 200-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的分析西班牙各地公立医院使用的知情同意书的可读性,目的是检查其向正在作出任何健康决定的人提供全面信息的功能,无论他们在西班牙的哪个地方。材料和方法对从西班牙全境收到的11,339份ICF进行了描述性研究,其中1617份ICF是从健康门户网站的4个网页收集的,其余的(9722份)是通过电子邮件和/或电话联系从2012年3月至2013年2月收到的。使用Inflesz工具研究可读性水平。采用简单随机抽样法对372例ICF进行了分析。采用Inflesz量表和Flesch-Szigriszt指数进行可读性分析。结果易读性结果显示,62.4%的ICF被评为“较难”,23.4%被评为“一般”,13.4%被评为“非常难”。使用Flesch指数,安达卢西亚的可读性最高,平均值为56.99 (95% CI;55.42-58.57)和Valencia,平均值为51.93 (95% CI;48.4 - -55.52)。最低的可读性平均值在加利西亚,平均值为40.77 (95% CI;9.83-71.71)和Melilla,平均值= 41.82 (95% CI;35.5 - -48.14)。结论西班牙语知情同意书的可读性无法按照标准量表进行分级,需要进一步提高其可读性水平。此外,西班牙ICF之间的差异很大,这表明西班牙公民在获取信息方面缺乏公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análisis global de la legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado utilizados en los hospitales públicos de España

Purpose

To analyse the readability of informed consent forms (ICF) used in Public Hospitals throughout Spain, with the aim of checking their function of providing comprehensive information to people who are making any health decision no matter where they are in Spain.

Material and methods

A descriptive study was performed on a total of 11,339 ICF received from all over Spanish territory, of which 1617 ICF were collected from 4 web pages of Health Portal and the rest (9722) were received through email and/or telephone contact from March 2012 to February 2013. The readability level was studied using the Inflesz tool. A total of 372 ICF were selected and analysed using simple random sampling. The Inflesz scale and the Flesch-Szigriszt index were used to analyse the readability.

Results

The readability results showed that 62.4% of the ICF were rated as a “little difficult”, the 23.4% as “normal”, and the 13.4% were rated as “very difficult”. The highest readability means using the Flesch index were scored in Andalusia with a mean of 56.99 (95% CI; 55.42-58.57) and Valencia with a mean of 51.93 (95% CI; 48.4-55.52). The lowest readability means were in Galicia with a mean of 40.77 (95% CI; 9.83-71.71) and Melilla, mean = 41.82 (95% CI; 35.5-48.14).

Conclusions

The readability level of Spanish informed consent forms must be improved because their scores using readability tools could not be classified in normal scales. Furthermore, there was very wide variability among Spanish ICF, which showed a lack of equity in information access among Spanish citizens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1