肿瘤学中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:患者的看法

M. Ortega-Moreno , N. Padilla-Garrido , L. Huelva-López , F. Aguado-Correa , J. Bayo-Calero , E. Bayo-Lozano
{"title":"肿瘤学中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:患者的看法","authors":"M. Ortega-Moreno ,&nbsp;N. Padilla-Garrido ,&nbsp;L. Huelva-López ,&nbsp;F. Aguado-Correa ,&nbsp;J. Bayo-Calero ,&nbsp;E. Bayo-Lozano","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine, from the point of view of the oncological patient, who made the decision about their treatment, as well as the major barriers and facilitators that enabled Shared Decision Making to be implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive, sand association study using a self-report questionnaire to selected cancer patients, with casual sampling in different oncology clinics and random time periods. A total of 108 patients provided analysable data. The information was collected on sociodemographic and clinical variables, who made the decision about treatment, and level of agreement or disagreement with various barriers and facilitators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than one-third (38.1%) of patients claimed to have participated in shared decision making with their doctor. Barriers such as, time, the difficulty of understanding, the paternalism, lack of fluid communication, and having preliminary and often erroneous information influenced the involvement in decision-making. However, to have or not have sufficient tools to aid decision making or the patient's interest to participate had no effect. As regards facilitators, physician motivation, their perception of improvement, and the interest of the patient had a positive influence. The exception was the possibility of financial incentives to doctors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The little, or no participation perceived by cancer patients in decisions about their health makes it necessary to introduce improvements in the health care model to overcome barriers and promote a more participatory attitude in the patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barreras y facilitadores para la implementación de la toma de decisiones compartidas en oncología: percepciones de los pacientes\",\"authors\":\"M. Ortega-Moreno ,&nbsp;N. Padilla-Garrido ,&nbsp;L. Huelva-López ,&nbsp;F. Aguado-Correa ,&nbsp;J. Bayo-Calero ,&nbsp;E. Bayo-Lozano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine, from the point of view of the oncological patient, who made the decision about their treatment, as well as the major barriers and facilitators that enabled Shared Decision Making to be implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive, sand association study using a self-report questionnaire to selected cancer patients, with casual sampling in different oncology clinics and random time periods. A total of 108 patients provided analysable data. The information was collected on sociodemographic and clinical variables, who made the decision about treatment, and level of agreement or disagreement with various barriers and facilitators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than one-third (38.1%) of patients claimed to have participated in shared decision making with their doctor. Barriers such as, time, the difficulty of understanding, the paternalism, lack of fluid communication, and having preliminary and often erroneous information influenced the involvement in decision-making. However, to have or not have sufficient tools to aid decision making or the patient's interest to participate had no effect. As regards facilitators, physician motivation, their perception of improvement, and the interest of the patient had a positive influence. The exception was the possibility of financial incentives to doctors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The little, or no participation perceived by cancer patients in decisions about their health makes it necessary to introduce improvements in the health care model to overcome barriers and promote a more participatory attitude in the patient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的从肿瘤患者的角度出发,确定是谁做出了治疗决策,以及共同决策实施的主要障碍和促进因素。材料和方法采用自我报告问卷对选定的癌症患者进行横断面、描述性和相关性研究,在不同的肿瘤诊所和随机时间段进行随机抽样。共有108例患者提供了可分析的数据。收集了社会人口学和临床变量的信息,谁决定治疗,以及对各种障碍和促进因素的同意或不同意程度。结果超过三分之一(38.1%)的患者声称参与了与医生的共同决策。时间、理解困难、家长式作风、缺乏流畅的沟通以及获得初步的、往往是错误的信息等障碍影响了参与决策。然而,是否有足够的工具来帮助决策或患者参与的兴趣没有影响。至于促进者,医生的动机,他们对改善的感知和病人的兴趣有积极的影响。唯一的例外是对医生的经济激励。结论癌症患者对其健康决策很少或没有参与,因此有必要改进医疗保健模式,以克服障碍,促进患者更多的参与态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barreras y facilitadores para la implementación de la toma de decisiones compartidas en oncología: percepciones de los pacientes

Objective

To determine, from the point of view of the oncological patient, who made the decision about their treatment, as well as the major barriers and facilitators that enabled Shared Decision Making to be implemented.

Material and methods

A cross-sectional, descriptive, sand association study using a self-report questionnaire to selected cancer patients, with casual sampling in different oncology clinics and random time periods. A total of 108 patients provided analysable data. The information was collected on sociodemographic and clinical variables, who made the decision about treatment, and level of agreement or disagreement with various barriers and facilitators.

Results

More than one-third (38.1%) of patients claimed to have participated in shared decision making with their doctor. Barriers such as, time, the difficulty of understanding, the paternalism, lack of fluid communication, and having preliminary and often erroneous information influenced the involvement in decision-making. However, to have or not have sufficient tools to aid decision making or the patient's interest to participate had no effect. As regards facilitators, physician motivation, their perception of improvement, and the interest of the patient had a positive influence. The exception was the possibility of financial incentives to doctors.

Conclusions

The little, or no participation perceived by cancer patients in decisions about their health makes it necessary to introduce improvements in the health care model to overcome barriers and promote a more participatory attitude in the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1