CECARI研究:依维莫司(Certican®)起始和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂停药对肾功能不全的维护性心脏移植受者:一项多中心、随机试验。

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-20 DOI:10.1155/2017/6347138
Jan Van Keer, David Derthoo, Olivier Van Caenegem, Michel De Pauw, Eric Nellessen, Nathalie Duerinckx, Walter Droogne, Gábor Vörös, Bart Meyns, Ann Belmans, Stefan Janssens, Johan Van Cleemput, Johan Vanhaecke
{"title":"CECARI研究:依维莫司(Certican®)起始和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂停药对肾功能不全的维护性心脏移植受者:一项多中心、随机试验。","authors":"Jan Van Keer,&nbsp;David Derthoo,&nbsp;Olivier Van Caenegem,&nbsp;Michel De Pauw,&nbsp;Eric Nellessen,&nbsp;Nathalie Duerinckx,&nbsp;Walter Droogne,&nbsp;Gábor Vörös,&nbsp;Bart Meyns,&nbsp;Ann Belmans,&nbsp;Stefan Janssens,&nbsp;Johan Van Cleemput,&nbsp;Johan Vanhaecke","doi":"10.1155/2017/6347138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (<i>N</i> = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (<i>N</i> = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6347138","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Van Keer,&nbsp;David Derthoo,&nbsp;Olivier Van Caenegem,&nbsp;Michel De Pauw,&nbsp;Eric Nellessen,&nbsp;Nathalie Duerinckx,&nbsp;Walter Droogne,&nbsp;Gábor Vörös,&nbsp;Bart Meyns,&nbsp;Ann Belmans,&nbsp;Stefan Janssens,&nbsp;Johan Van Cleemput,&nbsp;Johan Vanhaecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/6347138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (<i>N</i> = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (<i>N</i> = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6347138\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6347138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6347138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在这项为期3年、开放标签、多中心的研究中,57名肾功能不全(eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2)的维护者心脏移植受者(移植后>1年)被随机分组,开始使用依维莫司并停用CNI (N = 29)或继续目前基于CNI的免疫抑制(N = 28)。主要终点肾小球滤过率(mGFR)从基线到第3年的变化在两组之间没有显著差异(依维莫司组为+7.0 mL/min,而CNI组为+1.9 mL/min, p = 0.18)。在治疗分析中,差异确实具有统计学意义(依维莫司组为+9.4 mL/min, CNI组为+1.9 mL/min, p = 0.047)。全因死亡率、主要不良心血管事件或治疗急性排斥反应的复合安全性终点在两组之间没有差异。依维莫司组非致命性不良事件发生率为96.6%,CNI组为57.1% (p < 0.001)。依维莫司组有10例(34.5%)患者在随访期间因不良事件停药。依维莫司治疗依从性差可能掩盖了CNI停药对肾功能的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (N = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (N = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (p < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Pneumoperitoneum After Lung Transplantation: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques. Psychosocial Trauma History Negatively Impacts Liver Transplant Access in Women with Chronic Liver Disease. Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet. Addressing Kidney Transplant Shortage: The Potential of Kidney Paired Exchanges in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1