在学术医疗中心诊断脑死亡的可变性。

Neuroscience journal Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-02 DOI:10.1155/2017/6017958
Ashutosh Pandey, Pradeep Sahota, Premkumar Nattanmai, Christopher R Newey
{"title":"在学术医疗中心诊断脑死亡的可变性。","authors":"Ashutosh Pandey,&nbsp;Pradeep Sahota,&nbsp;Premkumar Nattanmai,&nbsp;Christopher R Newey","doi":"10.1155/2017/6017958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Research continues to highlight variability in hospital policy and documentation of brain death. The aim of our study was to characterize how strictly new guidelines of American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for death by neurological criteria were practiced in our hospital prior to appointment of neurointensivists. <i>Method</i>. This is a retrospective study of adults diagnosed as brain dead from 2011 to 2015. Descriptive statistics compared five categories: preclinical testing, neurological examination, apnea tests, ancillary test, and documentation of time of death. Strict adherence to AAN guidelines for brain death determination was determined. <i>Result</i>. 76 patients were included in this study. Preclinical prerequisites were fulfilled in 53.9% and complete neurological examinations were documented in 76.3%. Apnea test was completed in 39.5%. Ancillary test was completed in 29.8%. Accurate documentation of time of death occurred in 59.2%. Overall, strict adherence to current AAN guidelines for death by neurological criteria was correctly documented in 38.2%. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our study shows wide variability in diagnosing brain death. These findings led us to update our death by neurological criteria policy and increase awareness of brain death determination with the goal of improving our documentation following current AAN guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":91144,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience journal","volume":"2017 ","pages":"6017958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6017958","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Diagnosing Brain Death at an Academic Medical Center.\",\"authors\":\"Ashutosh Pandey,&nbsp;Pradeep Sahota,&nbsp;Premkumar Nattanmai,&nbsp;Christopher R Newey\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/6017958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Research continues to highlight variability in hospital policy and documentation of brain death. The aim of our study was to characterize how strictly new guidelines of American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for death by neurological criteria were practiced in our hospital prior to appointment of neurointensivists. <i>Method</i>. This is a retrospective study of adults diagnosed as brain dead from 2011 to 2015. Descriptive statistics compared five categories: preclinical testing, neurological examination, apnea tests, ancillary test, and documentation of time of death. Strict adherence to AAN guidelines for brain death determination was determined. <i>Result</i>. 76 patients were included in this study. Preclinical prerequisites were fulfilled in 53.9% and complete neurological examinations were documented in 76.3%. Apnea test was completed in 39.5%. Ancillary test was completed in 29.8%. Accurate documentation of time of death occurred in 59.2%. Overall, strict adherence to current AAN guidelines for death by neurological criteria was correctly documented in 38.2%. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our study shows wide variability in diagnosing brain death. These findings led us to update our death by neurological criteria policy and increase awareness of brain death determination with the goal of improving our documentation following current AAN guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience journal\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"6017958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6017958\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6017958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6017958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目标。研究继续强调医院政策和脑死亡记录的差异。我们研究的目的是描述美国神经病学学会(AAN)关于神经学标准死亡的新指南在任命神经强化医生之前在我们医院的严格程度。方法。这是一项对2011年至2015年被诊断为脑死亡的成年人的回顾性研究。描述性统计比较了五个类别:临床前测试、神经系统检查、呼吸暂停测试、辅助测试和死亡时间记录。确定严格遵守AAN脑死亡判定指南。结果:76例患者纳入本研究。53.9%的患者满足临床前先决条件,76.3%的患者有完整的神经系统检查记录。39.5%的患者完成了呼吸暂停测试。辅助试验完成率为29.8%。准确记录死亡时间的占59.2%。总体而言,38.2%的患者严格遵守当前AAN指南的神经学死亡标准。结论。我们的研究显示在诊断脑死亡方面存在很大的差异。这些发现使我们更新了根据神经学标准确定死亡的政策,并提高了对脑死亡确定的认识,目的是根据当前的AAN指南改进我们的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variability in Diagnosing Brain Death at an Academic Medical Center.

Objective. Research continues to highlight variability in hospital policy and documentation of brain death. The aim of our study was to characterize how strictly new guidelines of American Academy of Neurology (AAN) for death by neurological criteria were practiced in our hospital prior to appointment of neurointensivists. Method. This is a retrospective study of adults diagnosed as brain dead from 2011 to 2015. Descriptive statistics compared five categories: preclinical testing, neurological examination, apnea tests, ancillary test, and documentation of time of death. Strict adherence to AAN guidelines for brain death determination was determined. Result. 76 patients were included in this study. Preclinical prerequisites were fulfilled in 53.9% and complete neurological examinations were documented in 76.3%. Apnea test was completed in 39.5%. Ancillary test was completed in 29.8%. Accurate documentation of time of death occurred in 59.2%. Overall, strict adherence to current AAN guidelines for death by neurological criteria was correctly documented in 38.2%. Conclusion. Our study shows wide variability in diagnosing brain death. These findings led us to update our death by neurological criteria policy and increase awareness of brain death determination with the goal of improving our documentation following current AAN guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stress-Coping Humoral Glycolipids Produced by Mice Given Controlled Bathing Treatments Predictors of Seizure Recurrence after Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Impact of Tooth Loss and Other Risk Factors on Cognitive Impairment in Saudi Female Population Pathomechanisms of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in ALS. Sequential Changes in Brain Glutamate and Adenosine A1 Receptors May Explain Severity of Adolescent Alcohol Withdrawal after Consumption of High Levels of Alcohol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1