{"title":"起搏器导线感染引起的化脓性心包炎。","authors":"Teresa Backes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravenous drug users have a substantially increased risk of infective endocarditis, especially in the setting of implanted cardiac devices. Purulent pericarditis is a rare occurrence that can occur iatrogenically or through direct or hematogenous spread.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 75 year old man with a past medical history significant for hepatitis C, IV drug abuse, and sick sinus syndrome status post pacemaker was brought in by EMS with a chief complaint of diaphoresis and chest pain. Initial EKG revealed atrial fibrillation with ST elevations in multiple leads. The patient was taken urgently to the cardiac catheterization lab due to concern for STEMI. Left heart catheterization revealed nonobstructive CAD; bedside echo was significant for a pericardial effusion and a pacemaker lead vegetation. CT of the chest revealed extension of the ventricular pacemaker lead through the anterior right ventricular wall and pericardium and into the pleural cavity. Cardiothoracic surgery performed a pacemaker removal as well as pericardial window due to early tamponade; approximately 900 mL of purulent fluid was drained from the pericardial space. The patient was septic with initial blood cultures growing MSSA. He was also found to have multiple other foci of infection including a left-sided pleural effusion and a perihepatic fluid collection, both of which were drained and also grew out MSSA. The patient initially improved on antibiotics after his pacemaker removal and drainage of the infected fluid collections. However, several days after the pacemaker removal he gradually became more bradycardic; due to his multiple comorbidities and active infection, he was not a candidate for a replacement implanted pacemaker. He became profoundly bradycardic and hypotensive overnight and died despite the use of multiple pressors to maintain his blood pressure as well as transcutaneous pacing to maintain his heart rate.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Purulent pericarditis has become a relatively uncommon occurrence since the development of effective antibiotics. This case illustrates a rare example of purulent pericarditis and cardiac tamponade secondary to the extension of an infected pacemaker wire through the pericardium and into the thoracic cavity. The presence of multiple other infected fluid collections in this case also illustrates the need to thoroughly assess for secondary foci of infection in cases of bacterial endocarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22855,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society","volume":"169 2","pages":"51-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purulent Pericarditis Due to an Infected Pacemaker Lead.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Backes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravenous drug users have a substantially increased risk of infective endocarditis, especially in the setting of implanted cardiac devices. Purulent pericarditis is a rare occurrence that can occur iatrogenically or through direct or hematogenous spread.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 75 year old man with a past medical history significant for hepatitis C, IV drug abuse, and sick sinus syndrome status post pacemaker was brought in by EMS with a chief complaint of diaphoresis and chest pain. Initial EKG revealed atrial fibrillation with ST elevations in multiple leads. The patient was taken urgently to the cardiac catheterization lab due to concern for STEMI. Left heart catheterization revealed nonobstructive CAD; bedside echo was significant for a pericardial effusion and a pacemaker lead vegetation. CT of the chest revealed extension of the ventricular pacemaker lead through the anterior right ventricular wall and pericardium and into the pleural cavity. Cardiothoracic surgery performed a pacemaker removal as well as pericardial window due to early tamponade; approximately 900 mL of purulent fluid was drained from the pericardial space. The patient was septic with initial blood cultures growing MSSA. He was also found to have multiple other foci of infection including a left-sided pleural effusion and a perihepatic fluid collection, both of which were drained and also grew out MSSA. The patient initially improved on antibiotics after his pacemaker removal and drainage of the infected fluid collections. However, several days after the pacemaker removal he gradually became more bradycardic; due to his multiple comorbidities and active infection, he was not a candidate for a replacement implanted pacemaker. He became profoundly bradycardic and hypotensive overnight and died despite the use of multiple pressors to maintain his blood pressure as well as transcutaneous pacing to maintain his heart rate.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Purulent pericarditis has become a relatively uncommon occurrence since the development of effective antibiotics. This case illustrates a rare example of purulent pericarditis and cardiac tamponade secondary to the extension of an infected pacemaker wire through the pericardium and into the thoracic cavity. The presence of multiple other infected fluid collections in this case also illustrates the need to thoroughly assess for secondary foci of infection in cases of bacterial endocarditis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"169 2\",\"pages\":\"51-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purulent Pericarditis Due to an Infected Pacemaker Lead.
Introduction: Intravenous drug users have a substantially increased risk of infective endocarditis, especially in the setting of implanted cardiac devices. Purulent pericarditis is a rare occurrence that can occur iatrogenically or through direct or hematogenous spread.
Case description: A 75 year old man with a past medical history significant for hepatitis C, IV drug abuse, and sick sinus syndrome status post pacemaker was brought in by EMS with a chief complaint of diaphoresis and chest pain. Initial EKG revealed atrial fibrillation with ST elevations in multiple leads. The patient was taken urgently to the cardiac catheterization lab due to concern for STEMI. Left heart catheterization revealed nonobstructive CAD; bedside echo was significant for a pericardial effusion and a pacemaker lead vegetation. CT of the chest revealed extension of the ventricular pacemaker lead through the anterior right ventricular wall and pericardium and into the pleural cavity. Cardiothoracic surgery performed a pacemaker removal as well as pericardial window due to early tamponade; approximately 900 mL of purulent fluid was drained from the pericardial space. The patient was septic with initial blood cultures growing MSSA. He was also found to have multiple other foci of infection including a left-sided pleural effusion and a perihepatic fluid collection, both of which were drained and also grew out MSSA. The patient initially improved on antibiotics after his pacemaker removal and drainage of the infected fluid collections. However, several days after the pacemaker removal he gradually became more bradycardic; due to his multiple comorbidities and active infection, he was not a candidate for a replacement implanted pacemaker. He became profoundly bradycardic and hypotensive overnight and died despite the use of multiple pressors to maintain his blood pressure as well as transcutaneous pacing to maintain his heart rate.
Discussion: Purulent pericarditis has become a relatively uncommon occurrence since the development of effective antibiotics. This case illustrates a rare example of purulent pericarditis and cardiac tamponade secondary to the extension of an infected pacemaker wire through the pericardium and into the thoracic cavity. The presence of multiple other infected fluid collections in this case also illustrates the need to thoroughly assess for secondary foci of infection in cases of bacterial endocarditis.