初级保健哨兵事件的识别

G. Olivera Cañadas , A. Cañada Dorado , M. Drake Canela , B. Fernández-Martínez , G. Ordóñez León , M. Cimas Ballesteros
{"title":"初级保健哨兵事件的识别","authors":"G. Olivera Cañadas ,&nbsp;A. Cañada Dorado ,&nbsp;M. Drake Canela ,&nbsp;B. Fernández-Martínez ,&nbsp;G. Ordóñez León ,&nbsp;M. Cimas Ballesteros","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2017.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and describe a list of sentinel events (SEs) for Primary Care (PC).</p></div><div><h3>Methododology</h3><p>A structured experts’ consensus was obtained by using two online questionnaires. The participants were selected because of their expertise in PC and patient safety. The first questionnaire assessed the suitability of the hospital SEs established in the National Quality Forum 2006 for use in PC via responses of “yes”, “no”, or “yes but with modification”. In the latter case, a re-wording of the SE was requested. Additionally, inclusion of new SEs was also allowed. The second questionnaire included those SEs with positive responses (“yes”, “yes with modification”<em>)</em>, so that the experts could choose between the original and alternative drafts, and evaluate the newly described SEs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The questionnaires were completed by 44 out of a total of the 47 experts asked to participate, and a total of 17 SEs were identified as suitable for PC. For the first questionnaire, 12 of the 28 hospital SEs were considered adaptable to PC, of which 11 were re-drafts. Thirty-seven experts proposed new SEs. These mainly concerned problems with medication and vaccines, delay, or lack of assistance, diagnostic delays, and problems with diagnostic tests, and were finally summarised in 5 SEs. In the second questionnaire, ≥<!--> <!-->65% of the experts chose the alternative wording against the original cases for the 11 SEs suitable for PC. The 5 newly included SEs were considered adequate with a positive response of 70-85%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Having a list of SEs available in PC will help to improve the management of health care risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 5","pages":"Pages 269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.03.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identificación de eventos centinela en atención primaria\",\"authors\":\"G. Olivera Cañadas ,&nbsp;A. Cañada Dorado ,&nbsp;M. Drake Canela ,&nbsp;B. Fernández-Martínez ,&nbsp;G. Ordóñez León ,&nbsp;M. Cimas Ballesteros\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2017.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and describe a list of sentinel events (SEs) for Primary Care (PC).</p></div><div><h3>Methododology</h3><p>A structured experts’ consensus was obtained by using two online questionnaires. The participants were selected because of their expertise in PC and patient safety. The first questionnaire assessed the suitability of the hospital SEs established in the National Quality Forum 2006 for use in PC via responses of “yes”, “no”, or “yes but with modification”. In the latter case, a re-wording of the SE was requested. Additionally, inclusion of new SEs was also allowed. The second questionnaire included those SEs with positive responses (“yes”, “yes with modification”<em>)</em>, so that the experts could choose between the original and alternative drafts, and evaluate the newly described SEs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The questionnaires were completed by 44 out of a total of the 47 experts asked to participate, and a total of 17 SEs were identified as suitable for PC. For the first questionnaire, 12 of the 28 hospital SEs were considered adaptable to PC, of which 11 were re-drafts. Thirty-seven experts proposed new SEs. These mainly concerned problems with medication and vaccines, delay, or lack of assistance, diagnostic delays, and problems with diagnostic tests, and were finally summarised in 5 SEs. In the second questionnaire, ≥<!--> <!-->65% of the experts chose the alternative wording against the original cases for the 11 SEs suitable for PC. The 5 newly included SEs were considered adequate with a positive response of 70-85%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Having a list of SEs available in PC will help to improve the management of health care risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 269-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.03.003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的识别和描述初级保健(PC)的哨点事件(SEs)列表。方法采用两份在线问卷,获得结构化的专家共识。选择参与者是因为他们在PC和患者安全方面的专业知识。第一份问卷通过回答“是”、“否”或“是,但有修改”来评估2006年全国质量论坛中建立的医院SEs是否适合用于PC。在后一种情况下,有人要求重新措词。此外,还允许包含新的se。第二份问卷包括那些正面回答(“是”、“是,但有修改”)的社会经济指标,以便专家在原始草案和备选草案之间进行选择,并对新描述的社会经济指标进行评估。结果47位专家中有44位完成了问卷调查,共有17位专家被确定适合PC。在第一份问卷中,28家医院的se中有12家被认为适合PC,其中11家是重新起草的。37位专家提出了新的se。这些问题主要涉及药物和疫苗问题、延误或缺乏援助、诊断延误以及诊断测试问题,最后总结为5个紧急情况。在第二份问卷中,≥65%的专家对11个适用于PC的se选择了替代的措辞。新纳入的5个se被认为是足够的,阳性反应为70-85%。结论建立健康风险管理系统有助于提高健康风险管理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identificación de eventos centinela en atención primaria

Objective

To identify and describe a list of sentinel events (SEs) for Primary Care (PC).

Methododology

A structured experts’ consensus was obtained by using two online questionnaires. The participants were selected because of their expertise in PC and patient safety. The first questionnaire assessed the suitability of the hospital SEs established in the National Quality Forum 2006 for use in PC via responses of “yes”, “no”, or “yes but with modification”. In the latter case, a re-wording of the SE was requested. Additionally, inclusion of new SEs was also allowed. The second questionnaire included those SEs with positive responses (“yes”, “yes with modification”), so that the experts could choose between the original and alternative drafts, and evaluate the newly described SEs.

Results

The questionnaires were completed by 44 out of a total of the 47 experts asked to participate, and a total of 17 SEs were identified as suitable for PC. For the first questionnaire, 12 of the 28 hospital SEs were considered adaptable to PC, of which 11 were re-drafts. Thirty-seven experts proposed new SEs. These mainly concerned problems with medication and vaccines, delay, or lack of assistance, diagnostic delays, and problems with diagnostic tests, and were finally summarised in 5 SEs. In the second questionnaire, ≥ 65% of the experts chose the alternative wording against the original cases for the 11 SEs suitable for PC. The 5 newly included SEs were considered adequate with a positive response of 70-85%.

Conclusion

Having a list of SEs available in PC will help to improve the management of health care risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1